Correspondence between

Emails where every selected person appears as a sender, recipient, or copied participant.

Flint Police and Fire Chiefs

To
Thomas Saxton , Larry Steckelberg
importance: High See below the link to a Flint Journal article about the firing of the Police and Fire chiefs. The last paragraph refers to an interim Police chief. If accurate, it may be advisable for us to remind the Mayor that per the terms of the RTAB resolution she cannot name even an interim replacement without first submitting to the RTAB the minimum professional or occupational qualifications and the minimum/maximum salary range for the vacated positions. h xxxEND_PAGE:treasury01_b39_6977_7316_069 Osborne, Ken (TREASURY)

RE: emergency managers

Not in my view. The school districts that have had EFMs/EMs (Detroit, Highland Park, Inkster, and Muskegon Heights) have not fared well. Inkster was dissolved and the other school districts have had multiple EMs. Prior to 2011, I would have said the reason was that Act 72 drew an artificial distinction between fiscal matters and instruction/academics and granted EFMs authority only over the former. However, under both Acts 4 and 436, EMs have had control over both fiscal matters and 1 xxxEND_PAGE:treasury01_b38_6783_6976_164 instruction/academics and it appears to have made little difference in regards to lack of long-term success. It may be that because school finances are tied so closely to enrollments, that once enrollments begin a downward spiral, even an EM cannot cut enough, or quickly enough, to keep up.

RE: emergency managers

Here are three possibilities: 1, Village of Three Oaks. The EFM was appointed on December 1, 2008 and exited after only one year. The EFM resolved all financial issues (including cash flow and accounts payable), while working cooperatively with local officials. Indeed, so positive was the working relationship between the EFM and Village officials that for a number of years after the EFM’s departure, Village officials invited her back for annual events. City of Detroit. The EM was appointed on March 25. 2013 and was succeeded by a FRC on December 9, 2014, after guiding the City through the largest municipal bankruptcy in U.S, history in only 18 months. In doing so, the EM addressed three primary issues: first, a cash crisis that was projected to reach a cumulative deficit in excess of $100.0 million by June 30, 2013; second, recurring general fund deficits (the City had not experienced a positive year-end fund balance since fiscal year 2004); and third, long-term liabilities, including unfunded actuarial accrued pension liabilities and other post-employment benefits, that exceeded approximately $14 billion as of June 30, 2012. City of Hamtramck. The EM was appointed on July 1, 2013 and was succeeded by an RTAB on December 18, 2014. The EM addressed general fund operating deficits. In addition, unfunded liabilities (pension and other post-employment benefits) posed significant obstacles to long-term fiscal health. Actuarial evaluation had indicated the pension plan had $98.4 million in actuarial accrued liabilities, but only $55.8 million in pension assets (i.e., a funding ratio of only 56.8 percent). Fred xxxEND_PAGE:treasury01_b38_6783_6976_165

FW: Water Related Civil Litigation.PDF

FYI: During this morning’s weekly Local Government conference call with Flint officials, the City Administrator mentioned this letter and then forwarded a copy of it. I believe she also indicated she or the Mayor had provided acopy to Rich. I had not previously seen it. Oddly. the letter makes no mention of the State Treasurer's January 4, 2016, letter stating that Treasury would reimburse the City 75 percent of Shears related legal expenses up to $300,000 incurred by the City.

RE: State Treasurer’s Flint Letter

Only U.S. mail at this point. But, I will e-mail a copy this afternoon to the Mayor and City Administrator. On a related topic, I need to loop in Harvey on the proposed RTAB letter to Flint residents. Everyone (i.e., you, Wayne, Dave Murray) has signed off on the letter, but it was drafted before the Governor named Harvey as the point person for Flint issues.

Fw: Flint Letter to Nick

> > Tom: > > Nick forwarded the attached to me earlier this afternoon. The Flint Mayor and City Administrator are requesting assistance with covering costs associated with defending the two water/sewer rate cases (Shears and Kincaid). > > Chris Trebilcock, at Miller Canfield, estimates the total cost would be in the range $245,000 to $385,000. Based on the letter, the City has incurred $80,000 in costs so far. While not every statement in their letter is factual, | believe (as | stated yesterday) that financially assisting the City with this litigation would be money well spent given what is at stake should the City lose. > > Hopefully, the three of us can discuss on Monday. > > Fred > > <Mayor-City Administrator Letter, 12-10-15.pdf> xxxEND_PAGE:treasury01_b26_3730_4111_096 Connors, Paul (Ti reasury)

RE: Flint follow up

Tom and Wayne: This is as revised based upon additional notes from Eric. This is ready to go. Fred He ae Nee Summary from September 15, 2015, conference call between Treasury and City of Flint officials. The participants were: Tom Saxton, Wayne Workman, Fred Headen, and Eric Cline, from Treasury, and Dayne Walling, Natasha Henderson (City Administrator), Pete Bade (City Attorney), Tony Chubb (Assistant City Attorney), and Jody Lundquist (Finance Director) from the City. Issues discussed: e The City of Flint is involved in two lawsuits regarding water and sewer rates: Kincaid and Shears. Kincaid was decided by the Michigan Court of Appeals on June 11, 2015, The Court held that a 35 percent increase in water and sewer rates imposed by City officials on September 16, 2011, violated the City charter and that EM Mike Brown had no statutory authority to later ratify those rate increases in May of 2012. The Court of Appeals remanded the case to Genesee County Circuit Court. City officials intended to appeal the Court of Appeals Kincaid decision to the Michigan Supreme Court, but missed the filing deadline by one day. « Shears was decided by the Genesee County Circuit Court by a non-final order on August 17, 2015. Among other things, the Court enjoined City officials from any longer imposing the 35 increase in water and sewer rates; from disconnecting water or sewer service due to delinquent bills dating back to September 16, 2011; and from placing liens on property due to delinquent bills dating back to September 16, 2011. City officials have filed an appeal with the Michigan Court of Appeals seeking, among other things, a stay of the Genesee County Circuit Court injunction. e In the interim, City officials are complying with the Court’s order in Shears. City officials estimated that removal of the 35 percent increase in water and sewer rates from future bills will cost roughly $600,000 per month, or $7.2 million annually, Therefore, if the Court orders either refunds or credits against future water and sewer bills, retroactive to September 16, 2011, the cost would be roughly $28.8 million to date (i.¢., $600,000 per month times 48 months to date). The City Administrator indicated that City officials have not developed a plan to issue a refund of this magnitude because the City lacks sufficient funds to do so and they believe the City would be unable to operate at that point. e The City Administrator noted that the accounts receivable for water and sewer operations that are over 30 days old has increased from $7.8 million to $8.4 million since the Shears order. She also noted that, because xxxEND_PAGE:treasury01_b37_6553_6782_089 City officials are prohibited from disconnecting water or sewer service for non-payment, they expect this number to continue to increase. e The City Administrator noted that the measures taken to preserve funds within the water and sewer system to address these issues have delayed needed capital improvements, which has further exacerbated problems within the system. However, City officials cannot address capital needs without additional revenue. © The City Administrator brought up and stressed the importance of the State assistance sought by the Mayor in his September 14, 2015, letter to the Governor. The Mayor requested $30.0 million for infrastructure and capital improvements related to the City’s water and sewer system. Wayne indicated that the Mayor’s request had been received and promptly disseminated within Treasury and was being reviewed. However, he also indicated that, in his opinion, existing funding options were limited without additional legislative action. ae He He ok

RE: Flint follow up

Tom and Wayne: I did not take notes, but here is a summary as | recall it. Feel free to fill in missing items. Fred Peers Summary from September 15, 2015, conference call between Treasury and City of Flint officials. The participants were: Tom Saxton, Wayne Workman, Fred Headen, and Eric Cline, from Treasury, and Dayne Walling, Natasha Henderson (City Administrator), Pete Bade (City Attorney), Tony Chubb (Assistant City Attorney), and Jody Lundquist (Finance Director) from the City. Issues discussed: e The City of Flint is involved in two lawsuits regarding water and sewer rates: Kincaid and Shears. Kincaid was decided by the Michigan Court of Appeals on June 11, 2015. The Court heid that a 35 percent increase in water and sewer rates imposed by City officials on September 16, 2011, violated the City charter and that EM Mike Brown had no statutory authority to later ratify those rate increases in May of 2012. The Court of Appeals remanded the case to Genesee County Circuit Court. City officials intended to appeal the Court of Appeals Kincaid decision to the Michigan Supreme Court, but missed the filing deadline by one day. e Shears was decided by the Genesee County Circuit Court by a non-final order on August 17, 2015. Among other things, the Court enjoined City officials from any longer imposing the 35 increase in water and sewer rates; from disconnecting water or sewer service due to delinquent bills dating back to September 16, 2011; and from placing liens on property due to delinquent bills dating back to September 16, 2011. City officials have filed an appeal with the Michigan Court of Appeals seeking, among other things, a stay of the Genesee County Circuit Court injunction. * City officials estimated that removal of the 35 percent increase in water and sewer rates will cost roughly $600,000 per month. Therefore, if the Court orders either refunds or credits against future water and sewer bills retroactive to September 16, 2011, the cost would be roughly $28.8 million to ‘Hate (i.e., $600,000 per month times 48 months to date). e The City Administrator brought up and stressed the importance of the State assistance sought by the Mayor in his September 14, 2015, letter to the Governor. The Mayor requested $30.0 million for infrastructure and capital improvements related to the City’s water and sewer system. We RA

Fwd: Flint/KWA

I don't know who Fred the Engineer is. I spoke to Brooks Patterson Sat night. He won't get in middle of this despite Det News story. I think we need to understand if the legacy liability issue raised twice now presents a real risk to Flint. Also, Fred were you able to sort thru rate issue we discussed? Thanks, Andy Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: