F Flint Water Crisis Public Archive

Correspondence between

Emails where every selected person appears as a sender, recipient, or copied participant.

Richard Baird Thomas Saxton

RE: follow up

See all emails with these participants
> > > > I would be happy to do that but as I mentioned in our call this morning Wade Trim was not at that meeting last week (Fri) when City staff et al visited the pump station. > > They (WT) are supposedly getting engaged on that ‘as we speak’. So next week... WT, whoever Bob wants from DWSD, the city, & DEQ can meet or get on a call to speak more confidently about the problem(s). And to what extent it specifically involves the pumps. We are happy to facilitate that. > > Wayne - chime in if you think that makes sense or not. The state money we talked about a couple days ago I think remains the same; it may just be redirected a little differently in terms priorities and fixing problems. > > >

RE: Earley Flint Water OpEd-FOR REVIEW AND INPUT

See all emails with these participants
| know that no one is going to want te do this, but | don’t feel that itis unfair for Darnell ta set the record straight. This should be a decision for the G, Jarrod and Ban, however, my guess is that Darnell is not going to quietly accept the abuse of the Flint peoole without having his voice heard.

Flint Phone Call

See all emails with these participants
Importance: High I'd like to convene a phone call today to discuss a Flint water solution. Please let Stacie know your availability for a call today anytime between 2pm and 5pm and she will send out the appointment and conference line information. I'll loop in Gerry Ambrose once we reach consensus. Best, Harvey xxxEND_PAGE:executiveofficeemails20_b0719_2129_2129_1

RE: Re: Flint

See all emails with these participants
Tom, What are the total revenues collected from water and sewer rates for the following months: 9/14, 10/14, 11/14, 12/14? To get a handle on the last table you sent Friday that was attached to your communication below, I attached an excel spreadsheet to help me understand this better. The yellow highlighted cell is where I need data filled in. I broke up the potential reduction ($3m and $8.4m) and spread them into the monthly and annual even though is sounds like the $8.4 million for professional services is a one-time or short-term expense. The pink highlight is the % increase in rates base on the table you sent last Friday which is different from the 24% rate increase I calculated...so where did I error? Assuming there are fixed costs in the current rates via the Flint river, what are they? Thanks, Harvey

Showing 1-25 of 30