Correspondence between

Detection and Evaluation of Elevated Lead Release from Service Lines: A Field Study Date: Monday, January 13, 2014 8:42:39 AM Miguel is giving a webinar on his Chicago lead study; I know you all were interested in his work at the State Director's meeting. Sign up below; it's FREE! 2/3, 1 hour Jennifer

Just FYI] - mosily tent scenes.

Date: Thursday, May 23, 2013 11:33:35 AM FYI. If we are to comment, | would expect it to be the LCR experts and plumbing board members that would have insights into the issues that need further clarification. Brock, would you please coordinate any comments Michigan may wish to offer. Anyone else that has a comment should send them to Brock to compile. | don’t think we have to comment, but if we have something to say or something we wish EPA will address, we should do so even if others are saying it. EPA is more likely to respond when many comments are received on an issue. | know one of the biggest issues concerning the waterworks/plumbing industry is whether meter maintenance after January 3, 2014 will require that the entire meter be replaced with one that meets the new definition of lead free or if only those components that are being replaced must meet the new definition. If this document doesn’t address that issue or doesn’t satisfy us, we may want to comment.

FYI Liane J. Shekter Smith, P.E., Chief Resource Management Division Michigan Department of Environmental Quality 517-373-9523 xxxEND_PAGE:deq12_b191_0846_0846_1

Your presence is warranted because one of the major issues may be disinfection byproducts if Flint decides to use their WTP on a routine basis. xxxEND_PAGE:deq26_b056_0727_0727_1

Date: Friday, March 16, 2012 4:24:00 PM Your presence is warranted because one of the major issues may be disinfection byproducts if Flint decides to use their WTP on a routine basis. xxxEND_PAGE:deq01_b091_3636_3636_1

Date: Thursday, March 15, 2012 12:39:50 PM | don’t think | need to be present at this meeting, but | would like to be kept updated on the progress. Thanks! Kris Donaldson, P.E. Acting Assistant District Supervisor Resource Management Division Michigan Department of Environmental Quality 27700 Donald Court Waren, MI48092 ph. 586-753-3759 fax. 586-753-3831

| spoke with John O’Malia today concerning the meeting that he wants to set-up between the MDEQ, Flini, and Genesee County. He did not mention, in his forwarded e-mail, that the meeting would be held here at Constitution Hall. John expects approx 10 to attend (noi including MDEQ staff). Michaei Prysby - 517 335-6122

Date: Thursday, March 15, 2012 12:13:24 PM | spoke with John O’Malia today concerning the meeting that he wants to set-up between the MDEQ, Flint, and Genesee County. He did not mention, in his forwarded e-mail, that the meeting would be held here at Constitution Hall. John expects approx 10 to attend (not including MDEQ staff). Michael Prysby - 517 335-6122

Date: Wednesday, March 14, 2012 4:19:58 PM March 26" is the only day that | cannot attend... will be teaching the Lim Treatment SC at the RAM Center on the 26"". Also, | will be the lead person on the Flint/Genesee County project. Michael Prysby — MDEQ 517 335-6122

Date: Wednesday, March 14, 2012 3:32:11 PM Please see the note below. Mike P., I’m assuming you'd be the lead on this project. Who else needs to be included in this meeting? Looks like a significant change from our previous meeting. John O. is suggesting that Brock and Brant be included. Your thoughts? Kelly — do you wish to participate at this time or wait until there’s actually a proposal on the table? Liane J. Shekter Smith, P.E., Chief Resource Management Division Michigan Department of Environmental Quality 517-373-9523 alesis Original Message-----

Date: Monday, October 03, 2011 3:15:19 PM Kris, please weigh in before Adam calls them back. Pat suggested they resample, but he forgot it was already October (Can't fault Pat - | can’t remember what YEAR this is!) | believe the samples are improper and should not be used to calculate the 90". The supply cannot resample because we are outside the June-Sept monitoring period. Calculate the 90" on the available proper sample results. The supply is short the minimum number of samples, so an M/R violation applies as does admin fine and PN. | could be persuaded on the admin fine.

Date: Monday, October 03, 2011 2:42:26 PM can they since it's October?

| hate to say it, but since they did not meet the minimum 6 hour stagnation time, | don’t think we can accept the results of those 2 samples. They will have to resample. Pat

Date: Monday, October 03, 2011 2:40:35 PM | hate to say it, but since they did not meet the minimum 6 hour stagnation time, | don’t think we can accept the results of those 2 samples. They will have to resample. Pat

| was notified by Jeff Antil that Detroit received samples from Flint, and they were 2 samples short. Actually they had all samples, but according to the last use and collection times for 2 samples, equaled 5 hrs and 5.5 hrs stagnation time. Input please. thanks, Adam 1 xxxEND_PAGE:deq04_b075_2261_2598_138 Rennaker, Joanne (DEQ)

Date: Monday, October 03, 2011 2:20:13 PM | was notified by Jeff Antil that Detroit received samples from Flint, and they were 2 samples short. Actually they had all samples, but according to the last use and collection times for 2 samples, equaled 5 hrs and 5.5 hrs stagnation time. Input please. thanks, Adam xxxEND_PAGE:deq01_b207_3873_3873_1

(11-2-10).pptx Please try to accommodate this request. | can’t do much by next Thursday, and Patis oul as well. Atleast get some data on the number of violations we have experienced and make an effort to answer the questions at the end of this message. Thanks.