Correspondence between

Yes, the Sault Ste. Marie intake is in a connecting channel, but not part of the flow analysis as described below. Yes, there was a CAZ and assessment on the Flint Intake, see below: There may not be a need, but there is some good information available in the assessment. We should be assessing our new intakes, however, it’s quite a project to complete following the protocol. Set aside $’s?? xxxEND_PAGE:deq03_b606_3718_4178_379 \ $ ee bile, Para 9 | Explanation {He Flint Water-supply Intake @ Lakes A Polantial Contaminant Source (PCS) Critical Assessment Zone = BWA Boundary Susceptible Area ~—~ Rivers and Craaks

Not that it matters for your discussion, but Sault Ste. Marie is also in a connecting channel. Maybe DeTour as well? 2 xxxEND_PAGE:deq03_b606_3718_4178_380 Did we ever develop a CAZ for the Flint River? Do we need to if it will only be a rarely used, emergency intake in another 18 months?

Steve and Mike were the first ones on the agenda, which was fortunate in thet the audience was still relatively civil.

Pm sure we are all aware of the issue, but Flint is on the front page of the Detrot Free Press today. Jason Berndt Environmental Quality Analyst Office of Drinking Water and Municipal Assistance Gaylord Field Office 547-284-6542 989-705-3420 xxxEND_PAGE:deq21_b535_1525_1525_1

We do good work, One thing missing from the list belaw was Chuck’s note that one of our accomplishments should be that ne serious public health problems arose in the public water supply program in the past year. However, it is difficult to quantify “nothing bad happened.”

Attached is a draft copy ready for your review and comments. Thanks to Jean, as well, for helping write portions of this report and appendices. | would like to have comments incorporated and back to Diane/Connie before the end of next week, if possible. xxxEND_PAGE:deq26_b004_0052_0052_1