Correspondence between

Emails where every selected person appears as a sender, recipient, or copied participant.

RE: Consecutive sampling question

Date: Friday, December 11, 2015 2:20:36 PM We had a similar issue in Neithercut. We ended up using a tap not normally used for drinking water but did label it. Is there any type of faucet along that wing? For Neithercut we noted on the label that it was for consecutive sampling only. Stephen Busch, P.E. MDEQ Lansing District Coordinator Office of Drinking Water and Municipal Assistance Lansing and Jackson District Supervisor 517-643-2314 [email protected]

sample collection

Date: Friday, December 11, 2015 8:09:08 AM All, | don’t know the need, but if we are still sampling Flint water in January, | am available to help out on January 16 and January 30. Depending on kids sports schedules, | may also have availability in February and March as well. Please keep me in mind as needed. Thanks, Matt Remus, RS Contamination Investigation Program Office of Drinking Water and Municipal Assistance 517-284-6503 [email protected] xxxEND_PAGE:deq02_b436_3777_3777_1

sample collection

All, | don’t know the need, but if we are still sampling Flint water in January, | am available to help out on January 16 and January 30. Depending on kids sports schedules, | may also have availability in February and March as well. Please keep me in mind as needed. Thanks, Matt Remus, RS Contamination Investigation Program Office of Drinking Water and Municipal Assistance 517-284-6503 xxxEND_PAGE:deq21_b235_0781_0781_1

Brownell STEM Academy

| have some suggested changes. | used track changes, there is a comment on the last page regarding the use of “not detected” where earlier in the document we say “non detect”... think we should pick a way and be consistent. After these small changes, and George’s approval on content, | think we can forward to Lisa in OEA to put in report format. xxxEND_PAGE:deq21_b358_1029_1029_1

FW: Governor's Update

Importance: High | need your summary updates first thing Tuesday morning for anything done today. This is what | have so far: Item 3. ~ estimate the number of samples. Done. (100 per school). Item 5. ~ legislative changes to Part 54 — draft language provided to Maggie on 10/15. Item 10, — e-mail sent to Director of Shared Services requesting the three target/pilot elementary schools gather preliminary data and provide support for plumbing assessment by LARA staff. Item 11, - revised draft sampling protocol shared with LARA, DHHS, EPA and GCHD. 10/19. Item 19. - EPA comments received on 10/19 regarding Flint’s corrosion control treatment plan. Teleconference between DEQ and EPA scheduled for 10/20 to discuss.

RE: Preliminary and Deliberative Not Subject to FOIA Update of 2004 Letter

| believe Dana is in a meeting... To date, the numbers in the 2004 letter have been “update” by staff. A new letter has not been drafted. We were planning to discuss how the letter should be refreshed and whether or not it need to include new information. This has not occurred. Attached is the e-mail from staff with the updated numbers.

Follow-up

xxxEND_PAGE:deq21_b281_0870_0871_1 Yesterday, it was asked whether Lansing should be notified if you are involved with or working on a Pb/Cu issue. For now that will be a good idea. Please send me a brief e-mail (and cc Tracy Jo) that | can forward to Jim S. as a heads up. Please continue to do this for the near term as issues arise. Thanks. xxxEND_PAGE:deq21_b281_0870_0871_2

Follow-up

Date: Friday, October 09, 2015 1:45:00 PM Yesterday, it was asked whether Lansing should be notified if you are involved with or working ona Pb/Cu issue. For now that will be a good idea. Please send me a brief e-mail (and cc Tracy Jo) that | can forward to Jim S. as a heads up. Please continue to do this for the near term as issues arise. Thanks. xxxEND_PAGE:deq03_b094_0111_0111_1

Re: Draft FY 2014 End of Year Evaluation

Date: Friday, September 25, 2015 8:05:57 AM In general, I think this looks good. Was it shared with George Kristian at the lab for review? One other point, not sure how eDWR would reduce the number of samples that exceed the hold time. I didn't include Jennifer on this response. Make sure she knows I had a chance to look at her review. Thanks.

Showing 1-25 of 32