Couple of followup questions on the memo.
1) I can't find an attachment that is referenced.
2) The statement is made a couple times that even the most expensive K WA projection is still
cheaper than DWSD. What assumptions are made about rate increases for DWSD that leads to
this conclusion?
3) How does the new issue of the second pipe for redundancy change the equation? Does it affect
the recommendation?
Thanks.
Sent from my iPad
41
xxxEND_PAGE:treasury01_b06_0561_0924_208
Project Costs - TYJT Slides 26 through 30
Intake and Crib
Construction
ELAC
Property
Pumping Stations
Construction
Engineering
Design Engineering
Construction Management
Administration
Legal / Easements / Contracts
Power
Redundant Power
Total Construction
Total ELAC
Total Land / Property / Easements
Total Power
Total Redundant Power
Total
ELAC as % of Construction
ELAC
KWA
$22,076,850
$5,519,213
$2,300,000
$24,618,080
$6,154,520
$166,202,316
$41,550,579
$4,000,000
$212,897,246
$53,224,312
$2,300,000
$4,000,000
$0
$272,421,558
25.0%
1/4/2013
TYJT
$22,076,850
$5,519,213
$2,300,000
$54,573,314
$75,000
$16,394,494
$167,419,530
$50,225,859
$1,166,170
$16,939,581
$14,434,609
$349,440
$831,000
$4,000,000
$1,273,200
$244,069,694
$104,694,196
$3,541,170
$4,000,000
$1,273,200
$357,578,260
42.9%
ROWE
xxxEND_PAGE:treasury01_b06_0561_0924_209
Lamphier, Wendy (Treasury)