David Guastella

Vice President at Tucker, Young, Jackson, Tull Inc. / Engineer

30

Emails

Nov 2012–Apr 2013

Archive range

30 emails found.

RE: Flint/GC Presentation

Mr. Dillon: We have reviewed DWSD's final offer to Flint/ Genesee County of April 24, 2013 and find it responsive to Flint's concerns and their water demand requirements. The offer appears to mitigate all the potential risks to Flint (joining K WA) identified by TYJT in our February 2013 Report to you and our subsequent meetings. We have one recommendation for consideration related to service redundancy (refer to bottom of page 2 and top of page 3 & Item 4, page 10 of the power point presentation material of DWSD's offer document): TYJT would recommend that Flint asks DWSD to construct the second redundant line from Imlay Station to Flint and possibly purchase the existing 72 inch Flint- Owned line from Baxter/Potter (FL~1) to the Flint WTP. This redundant line cost could either be allocated to the entire DWSD water system (common to all allocations) or the cost could be included under the new water rate to Flint (should push to be included in the common to all allocations). TYJT believes that this would result in the following benefits: 1, Since Flint is unable to cost- effectively bond capital, the cost of financing could be easily obtained by DWSD; 2. DWSD has detailed and unique engineering experience for large and lengthy transmission mains design and construction; and 3. Long term operation and maintenance of the piping would be the responsibility of one entity, thus mitigating in the future who may be responsible for water main failures (breaks, leaks, hydraulic transients, etc.). With the twin line, redundancy will be afforded to Flint's supply which will help in eliminating the dependency on the WTP/Flint River (except for the use of the high lift pumps) and thus generating tremendous O&M savings. Please let us know if need any additional support. Regards, George Karmo, P.E., BCEE TYJT/President (direct office) B (cell) [email protected] none Original Message-----

RE: Treasury: Flint Assessment

Good morning Brom, We were contacted by the Treasurer last Thursday and met with him on Friday. He also asked that we draft a summary recommendation for his use. It is was sent to him yesterday and is attached to this email along with his response below. Our recommendations are for Flint to continue with DWSD’s services in lieu of being supplied by KWA. Although your memorandum took into account alternative proposals by KWA, it did not consider DWSD’s new proposals made through the Treasury last month to build a second parallel line to the existing Flint WTP. These proposals are less costly than the most optimistic KWA proposal and the cost information was provided to the Treasurer on Friday as well. Note that the a second parallel line removes the need for Flint to operate its treatment plant and significantly reduces their operating costs. The additional reasons for our recommendations are also summarized in the attached recommendations. It is also worth noting that it is good engineering practice to be conservative in estimates when a majority ofthe design has not been completed. We believe this to be prudent; especially when considering the financial capabilities and responsibilities of the end user (Flint). When a design is nearly complete, then it is acceptable to use the engineering estimate as there are specific quantities and materials of construction to cost out. This point is brought to your attention to outline our approach. For the intake estimate, which was 90% complete at the time of our analysis, was used “as provided” in our cost comparison. We would hope that this cost is close to the contractors bid in February. However, this should not be consider a telltale for the rest of the project as the remaining costly components are only designed at a very preliminary level. Please contact me should you need further clarification or have any questions. Thank you, Dave -----Original Message-----

Flint Water Supply Alternatives

To
Unknown recipient
38 xxxEND_PAGE:treasury01_b06_0561_0924_239 > Good afternoon Treasurer Dillon, > > As requested in our meeting on Friday, March 15th, | am attaching TYJT’s recommendation regarding Flint's alternatives for water supply. Please do not hesitate to contact us should you have any questions or wish us to look into anything further regarding this issue. > > Thank you, > > Dave > <TYIT Recommendaton DWSD vs Flint.pdf>

Flint Water Supply Alternatives

Good afternoon Treasurer Dillon, As requested in our meeting on Friday, March 15th, I am attaching TYJT’s recommendation regarding Flint's alternatives for water supply. Please do not hesitate to contact us should you have any questions or wish us to look into anything further regarding this issue. Thank you, Dave xxxEND_PAGE:treasury01_b06_0561_0924_234 C STATE OF MICHIGAN CONTRACT NO. 271N3200089 CITY OF FLINT WATER SUPPLY ASSESSMENT At the request of the Treasurer, Tucker, Young, Jackson, Tull, inc. (TYJT) makes the following recommendation to the Department of Treasury concerning Flint’s water supply alternatives. Based on the financial analysis performed of the various options presented by DWSD to continue treated water service to Flint compared to Flint being supplied by the new KWA untreated water system, TYJT believes that several of the options presented by DWSD are lower in cost currently and over the long run than the one offered by KWA. TYJT also believes that DWSD’s most recent offer (subsequent to the submittal of our report} to build a smaller parallel water main from Imlay to Flint, funded by the entire DWSOD base of customers, is the best solution offering the least cost alternative and the required redundancy by MDEQ. Furthermore, since a majority of the KWA system has not been designed and none of the system has been constructed, there is an additional risk that the cost of the KWA system may actually be higher than estimated due to potential construction delays and unforeseen conditions. This risk to Flint could be substantial since the city is responsible for 30 percent of the KWA design and construction costs while still having to purchase water from DWSD during the construction period. Finally, there are other issues that were identified in our report that may result in risks to Flint if it were to join KWA that should be considered by the Treasury in determining how Flint’s potable water should be supplied. These issues are related to redundancy and reliability, other items affecting cost, and Flint’s desire to control its own destiny related to its water supply. These are described further below. = DWSD’s supply to Flint is via a 72-inch water main from Imlay City. This main also supplies Imlay City, Mayfield and the Greater Lapeer County Utilities Authority (GLCUA). The volume of water contained within the 72-inch main is approximately 30 million gallons. If Genesee and Flint move to KWA then the three remaining communities’ consumption would most likely not be large enough to maintain fresh water in DWSD’s pipeline (due to loss of chlorine residual). DWSD may consider shutting down the 72-inch line completely due to the water quality concerns, which would then create an additional burden for Imlay, Mayfield and GLCUA to finance treated water supplies. The KWA supply option is counter to the Treasury's Competitive Grant Assistance Program (Formerly EVIP Grant). This program has been put in place to allow for communities to consolidate their services and save money. Two existing customers of DWSD (Flint and Genesee County) along with the potential of others customers (GLCUA, Mayfield, Imlay City) separating from another water system is in contradiction to the program. e There is a concern over the ability of smaller systems (KWA) over larger systems (DWSD) to pay for future unfunded mandates and regulations. Obviously, identifying regulation requirements over 30 years is hard to determine. However, it is widely accepted that a large system has greater ability to respond to unfunded mandates because the cost can be distributed over a large customer base. e Although Flint will be responsible for 30 percent of the construction cost, they will only have a minority vote on the KWA board. Furthermore, there are other communities (Lapeer County, the City of Lapeer, and Sanilac County) that sit on the board and vote. However, they are not purchasing water nor contributing to the construction costs. Their position on the KWA Board will not provide them an ability to “control their own destiny,” as they have stated to the Treasury. xxxEND_PAGE:treasury01_b06_0561_0924_235 Lamphier, Wendy (Treasury)

Meeting with the Treasurere regading KWA

Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged Good evening Amy, I just received additional information from DWSD regarding an alternative option we had proposed. {fat all possible it would be easier to go over this information in person rather than over the phone. As | indicated we can meet anywhere if that helps. Please let me know. Otherwise, | will wait for his call. Thank you, Dave xxxEND_PAGE:treasury01_b06_0561_0924_215 9500 (Rev 04-11) STATE OF MICHIGAN RICK SNYDER DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY ANDY DILLON GOVERNOR STATE TREASURER DATE: March 15, 2013 TO: Governor Rick Snyder FROM: Andy Dillon, State Treasurer SUBJECT: Status of Financially Distressed Local Governments FEBRUARY JANUARY Cities Cities | EM/EFM 5 5 | Consent Agreement 3 3 | Watch List 5 5 | __ | Per your request, this memorandum summarizes the status of selected financially distressed units of local government. The following units of local government now are subject to Public Act 72 of 1990, the Local Government Fiscal Responsibility Act. GENERAL ISSUES Cities Close to an Exit by EFM: e Ecorse — While most of the financial issues are resolved, the City Council without the State’s involvement, has the authority, through practice and a loosely worded city charter, to meddle in the day-to-day operations of the City, including selecting and supervising staff and setting their pay. Efforts to obtain a voluntary Inter Local Agreement have been frustrated by the unwillingness of a majority of Council to see the need for the oversight contemplated by the ILA. While we continue to work on a compromise, worst case is that we will impose a tran- sition advisory board (TAB) under PA 436 in late March. e Pontiac — As explained below, Mr. Schimmel has a short list of projects to complete before he leaves this summer. Imposition of a TAB will be recommended. Retiree Health Care — In most of the EFM cities, and certainly in those cities that are struggling but not yet in receivership, the cost of promised retiree health care is a major concern. In Pontiac and Flint where changes in retiree health care were imposed under PA 4, lawsuits are pending leaving the effects of those changes uncertain. In Pontiac, the annual liability is about $6.0 million, which is also the amount of the City’s current annual operating deficit. Allen Park’s annual liability is approxi- weww.mchigan gowireasury xxxEND_PAGE:treasury01_b06_0561_0924_216 Governor Snyder March 15, 2013 Page 2 of 16 mately $2.5 million and Flint’s is nearly $20 million, half of which is in the general fund. While Flint and Pontiac have each taken steps to reduce the annual expense of the health coverage the retirees enjoy, those changes are being challenged. In most of our EFM cities, this issue is a difficult obstruc- tion to fiscal balance. Pontiac, our most extreme case, has 52 current employees in the health care system compared to approximately 1200 retirees receiving health care. Treasury is working to devel- op a standard process to use when addressing retiree health care spending. EFM Exit Strategy — Treasury will be meeting individually with each EFM during the next two months to develop a timeline for them to exit the local unit. This timeline will include the specific financial and operational issues that must be resolved in order to exit; target dates for issue resolu- tion; and a benchmarking component. Additionally, Treasury is crafting a list of criteria for each EFM city which establishes success and serves as benchmarks for returning each unit to local con- trol. EMERGENCY MANAGER - Cities City of Allen Park © Update: Joyce Parker was appointed Emergency Financial Manager by the Emergency Loan Board on October 25, 2012, with duties beginning October 29. She also serves, part- time, as the Emergency Financial Manager for the City of Ecorse. * For fiscal year ending June 30, 2012, the City had an operating surplus of $2,973,862, or 18% of general fund revenues of $16,202,731. However, when transfers out of the general fund are taken into account, the financial picture is much worse. The City transferred $4.7 million (net of transfers in) from the general fund, including a $2.4 million transfer associated with studio debt and a $2.5 million transfer to cover retirement health care. Based on these numbers, the City’s unrestricted accumulated general fund deficit is $1,090,225 or 6.7% of revenues. e Treasury is exploring the potential to restructure the studio debt. The EFM has listed the movie studio property for sale and is preparing a detailed Deficit Elimination Plan. The City’s financial distress is exacerbated by the minimum staffing requirements contained in the public safety collective bargaining agreements and the cost of retiree health care. e The Road Out: With our recent entrance into Allen Park, several general strategies are in play. As noted above, the budget is in deficit primarily because of the movie studio debt and the retiree health care obligations. However, labor contracts have minimum manning provisions that need to be resolved, and there are several areas of ongoing expense that can be reduced. Among other things, the EFM’s draft deficit elimination plan also in- cludes personnel reductions (including police and fire), wage reductions, pension plan changes, active and retiree health care changes, reduction in sick days and holiday pay- outs, and revenue enhancements for rubbish and lights. Ms. Parker believes that it may be possible to balance these financial issues short of bankruptcy. However, that option is also being explored. Allen Park’s exit from Emergency Manager status will likely de- xxxEND_PAGE:treasury01_b06_0561_0924_217 Governor Snyder March 15, 2013 Page 3 of 16 pend on Treasury’s ability to restructure the City’s movie studio debt and make signifi- cant adjustments to the City’s retiree healthcare liabilities. City of Benton Harbor Joe Harris was appointed Emergency Financial Manager on August 8, 2012. The Emer- gency Loan Board terminated Mr. Harris’ contract effective January 31, 2013 and appointed Mr. Tony R. Saunders II as the new EFM effective February 1, 2013. For the fiscal year ending June 30, 2012, Benton Harbor had an operating shortfall of $1,125,798, exceeding general fund revenues of $6,555,653 by 17%. The unrestricted accu- mulated general fund deficit is $2,285,483 or 34% of general fund revenues. The unrestrict- ed deficit increased slightly over 2011 by approximately $56,000. Update: The new EFM has established a working with relationship with the City Commis- sion which has resulted in the Commission approving a resolution of support placing a millage proposal on the May ballot. The millage proposal, if approved, replaces the 10 mill special assessment levied during December 2012, with a 10 mill operating levy. The proposal will also include asking voters for a 3 mill increase . The EFM has requested and received an advancement of the April and June revenue sharing payments to address the cash shortage. A $2.5 million emergency loan application is anticipated during July. The Road Out: Mr. Saunders is reviewing all City operational expenses in an effort to ra- tionalize annual expenses and eliminate deficit spending. The large amount of accounts pay- able is a near-term focus. The water plant is a major liability, particularly since users in Benton and St. Joseph Townships have withdrawn from the system due to ongoing political and financial management concerns. The City charter needs to be updated, the performance of City Council needs to be improved, and ongoing liabilities for retiree health care are also an issue. OFR staff are working with the new EM on the water/sewer system debt, transfer of the pension system to MERS and reductions in staff. Treasury had anticipated that with- drawal from the City would be a near-term possibility if charter issues could be overcome. However, these recent revenue issues and the demise of the water system customer base, make a near-term exit more challenging. The new EM understands our desire to make an ex- it as soon as possible. City of Ecorse Joyce Parker was appointed Emergency Financial Manager on August 8, 2012 by the Emer- gency Loan Board. She was first appointed Emergency Financial Manager on October 30, 2009. She continues to serve Ecorse on a part-time basis while she also serves as Emergency Financial Manager for the City of Allen Park. City Council is cool toward an interlocal agreement proposed by Treasury that would create an advisory board under the Urban Cooperation Act, PA 7 of 1967 (Ex. Session) and create a seamless transition process away from an EFM, allowing Ms. Parker to end xxxEND_PAGE:treasury01_b06_0561_0924_218 Governor Snyder March 15, 2013 Page 4 of 16 her service there. A majority of Council believe such an advisory board is unnecessary. Treasury staff is redrafting the [LA to address some of the suggestions made by the AG. The revised agreement will be reviewed with the Council. For the fiscal year ending June 30, 2012 the City had a general fund balance of $2,419,220 or 18.8% of general fund revenues of $12,904,604 and experienced an operating surplus for the first time in several years. The Road Out: The work of the EFM is essentially done. The remaining concern is with the City Council and the City charter language which allows substantial day-to-day in- volvement of the City Council. Discussions continue on an interlocal agreement to estab- lish a Transition Advisory Board, as explained above. If this voluntary approach is not successful, a TAB can be imposed with the advent of PA 436 in late March. City of Flint Edward Kurtz was appointed Emergency Financial Manager on August 8, 2012 by the Emergency Loan Board. He succeeded Mike Brown who was appointed Emergency Man- ager on November 29, 2011, The Emergency Financial Manager is anticipated to be in Flint for more than one year. Mr. Kurtz is taking a minimal salary as EFM, while Mike Brown now works as City Administrator, appointed by Mr. Kurtz. It is assumed that Mike Brown will be reappointed as EM in late March, and that Mr. Kurtz will be retained until June to consult with the City on the FY 2014 budget. For fiscal year ending June 30, 2012, the City incurred a general fund operating shortfall of $10,169,828 exceeding general fund revenues of $51,497,686 by 20%. This resulted in an unrestricted accumulated general fund deficit of $19,184,850, which is 37% of general fund revenues. Update: The City of Flint has been participating with Genesee County on the feasibility of the City’s use of a planned water pipe line from Lake Huron that would serve a large portion of Genesee County as an alternative to water supplied by DWSD. An engineer- ing firm selected by Treasury to conduct an independent evaluation of Flint’s choices for water supply presented their findings on December 18". This is a critical long-term de- cision for Flint and the region. The economics show that but for the excess cost of DWSD water during the three year construction period of the Karegnondi Water Authori- ty (KWA) pipeline, the City will benefit from lower water costs in the long term by us- ing the KWA water and treating the water in Flint at their own, existing, water treatment plant. A recent proposal shows that with cooperative efforts with the County, those ex- cess costs can be further minimized. The Budget for the current fiscal year encompasses both revenue increases and expenditure reductions in an effort to achieve a balanced budget. For example, the budget includes as- sessments for waste collection, for the operation, maintenance, and improvement of street lights, and a 25 percent increase in water and sewer rates. Voters overwhelmingly approved a 6 mill public safety millage in November that will substantially improve the FY 14 budget. xxxEND_PAGE:treasury01_b06_0561_0924_219 Governor Snyder March 15, 2013 Page 5 of 16 On the expenditure reduction side, the budget reduces the City’s workforce by 150 positions (20 percent), and includes employee concessions and a restructuring of employee health care benefits. Retiree health care has been eliminated for future employees. Litigation is pending in federal court to preclude changes to retiree health care. The Emergency Financial Manag- er estimates that retiree health care costs will increase by $3.5 million during the current fis- cal year if he is prevented from implementing the planned changes. The City has recently submitted a five year deficit elimination plan that anticipates submittal of an emergency loan application of $12 million to address the accumulated deficit. The re- mainder of the unrestricted accumulated general fund deficit will be eliminated through $7.1 million in reductions. The City has not yet identified specific cuts but will do so as it works through the development of its fiscal year 2014 budget. The Department is assisting the City with the identification of possible reductions. The City’s first contract with a private a solid waste removal firm was recently implemented. Republic Services hired 20 of the 24 former city employees who provided this service. Re- public also purchased a number of former city waste vehicles and will implement recycling services during the summer of 2013. The transition has progressed smoothly. The Road Out; This is the first year of the EFM’s balanced budget and they are currently on track with the budget. Major remaining issues are resolving public safety staffing and effec- tiveness; establishing new and cooperative approaches to water and sewer services; funding and maintaining infrastructure; defining and sustaining blight eradication strategies; and funding OPEB liabilities. Treasury will be meeting with Flint’s EFM during the next month to develop a timeline for him to exit the local unit. City of Pontiac Lou Schimmel was appointed Emergency Financial Manager by the Emergency Loan Board on August 8, 2012. He was first appointed Emergency Manager on October 6, 2011. The Emergency Financial Manager is anticipated to complete his work by mid-2013, but a viable oversight mechanism, such as a Transition Advisory Board (TAB) under PA 436 of 2012, will be necessary for this to happen. For fiscal year ending June 30, 2012, the City had an operating shortfall of $1,249,049 ex- ceeding general fund revenues of $38,709,018 by 3%. This resulted in an unrestricted accu- mulated general fund deficit of $4,748,117 or 12% of general fund revenues. For fiscal year 2013, the City’s financial position will benefit from the transfer of the Pontiac Wastewater Treatment Plant. From the assets received, $8.4 million was used to pay off a loan to the general fund from the water/sewer fund; $6 million was used for retiree healthcare bringing the 2013 budget into balance; $3.4 million will be applied to the accumulated deficit from fiscal year 2012. The EFM reports that FY2014 would be balanced except for the $6.0 million required for health care costs associated with retired non-public safety employees, and those who are still xxxEND_PAGE:treasury01_b06_0561_0924_220 Governor Snyder March 15, 2013 Page 6 of 16 active employees. Retired public safety employees (there are no active Pontiac public safety employees) are covered by an existing VEBA. The Emergency Financial Manager continues to minimize the number of unused vacant properties in the City that are city-owned. The demolition of the Phoenix Center and sale of land project remains on hold after Oakland County Circuit Court Judge Michael War- ren issued an injunction barring the City from demolishing the Phoenix Center. Settle- ment negotiations are proceeding. The partnership with Oakland County for a restructuring of the ownership of the Pontiac Wastewater Treatment Plant is essentially complete. The capitalization of assets created by the transfer generated approximately $55 million, which was used to reduce bond debt relat- ed to Fiscal Stabilization bonds, Water Supply system, Sewage Disposal system, and Build- ing Authority. The transaction has dramatically improved the City’s cash position while also eliminating most of the City’s outstanding debt, and preserving a reasonable fund for infra- structure maintenance within the City. It is also projected that Pontiac users of the system will enjoy significant reductions in their costs for sewer services in future years. Update: The EFM continues to reduce general fund expenses. He has successfully negotiat- ed cost reductions with the City's waste pickup contractor; secured agreement from the Chief Judge to control the City's subsidy to the 50th District Court by having the Court process its own employee payroll and pay court employees out of its own account instead of the City's general fund account; and he contracted out all remaining DPW services in- cluding the snow plowing of major streets with the Oakland County Road Commission. The Road Out: Mr. Schimmel expects to leave this summer and strongly supports the use of a transition advisory board. His list of tasks remaining are: Phoenix Center Demoli- tion; sale of DPW building to Consumers Energy; auction of surplus stuff; provide for the redevelopment of the Hayes Jones Community Center; sale of various properties, includ- ing golf course; and substantially reduce the $6.0 million annual deficit related to retiree health care. Mr. Schimmel recently presented to Treasury a concept plan for utilizing ap- parent overfunding in two retirement plans to eliminate or dramatically reduce City costs for retiree health care. Treasury encouraged further refinement of the plan subject to cer- tain conditions being addressed. CONSENT AGREEMENT - CITIES City of Detroit For fiscal year ending June 30, 2012, the City had an operating surplus of $105,842,769. However, when transfers out of the general fund are taken into account, the City’s financial position is much worse. The City transferred $236,542,790 with the largest transfer going to the transportation fund for $87.2 million, $61.2 million to the debt service fund, and $80.9 million for interest payments on the pension obligation certificates. This resulted in an unre- xxxEND_PAGE:treasury01_b06_0561_0924_221 Governor Snyder March 15, 2013 Page 7 of 16 stricted accumulated deficit of $327,956,700 or 30% of general fund revenues of $1,100,342,313. « The City continues to implement the “countermeasures” developed in order to net approxi- mately $117 million in cash improvements by June 30 and allow the City to maintain a posi- tive (though minimal) cash position through the end of the fiscal year. Much of the cash savings are realized by deferring required payments into the next fiscal year. ® On February 1, a first draft of the 5 year plan for the City was presented to the Review Team. The plan would eliminate the deficit within 5 years by significantly lowering em- ployee costs. Changes include a reduction of an additional 500 FTEs, freezing all pension vesting for one year, moving all employees to a defined contribution plan after that, and capping health care expenditures at $125 million a year (compared to a current spend of roughly $190 million). Other potential savings being considered include additional head- count reductions/furloughs, asset sales, debt restructuring, and revenues. Update: As of early March, this has been expanded into a draft 10 year plan. e Update: Information provided by the City (but as yet unverified) indicates that the Gen- era] Retirement System Pension Board has set aside $3 million of pension funds to fund a lawsuit against an Emergency Financial Manager, if one is named. « Update: The Detroit Public Lighting Authority board held its first meeting on March 1. While the authority cannot draw utility tax revenues until bonds are issued, the immediate focus is on getting a loan from the general fund to replace 10-15,000 lights that are out due to operational issues (as opposed to underlying infrastructure issues). e Update: Judge Cox, who currently oversees the Detroit Water and Sewerage Department (DWSD), has expressed an interest in ending federal oversight. Although non-binding, this will require initial agreement among stakeholders about the path going for- ward. Treasury generally supports a proposal to move DWSD to a semiautonomous au- thority. This course may significantly benefit the City however; it is also Treasury’s position that the City’s investment banker (Miller Buckfire) conduct a thorough analysis of the various options available, so that no action would be taken that would foreclose on any possibility. The “Root Cause Committee” (consisting of members from the City’s Administration, City Council and the Water Board), has drafted a non-binding report to be presented to Judge Cox in support of the authority option. The Judge had set a March 15 deadline for completion of the report. City of Inkster e The City of Inkster operates under a Consent Agreement which was implemented effec- tive February 28, 2012. e For fiscal year ending June 30, 2012, the City had a general fund operating shortfall of $3,171,524 or 19% of general find revenues of $15,859,971. The FY12 shortfall increased xxxEND_PAGE:treasury01_b06_0561_0924_222 Governor Snyder March 15, 2013 Page 8 of 16 the City’s general fund unrestricted accumulated deficit to $3,604,783 or 22% of general fund revenues. For FY13, the City reduced staffing by 20% and made other expenditure reductions. Current budget forecasts suggest a year end deficit of $1.7 million, consistent with the DEP. The most current budget to actual report shows the City’s general fund breaking even instead of generating a $600,000 surplus as budgeted. The City is preparing FY 2012-13 budget amendments which include proposed reductions of $500,000. The pro- jected loss in property value in the city for FY 2013-14 is 9.2%.The City’s deficit elimi- nation plan anticipates the FY14 budget will be balanced. Treasury is concerned about ongoing cooperation between the City Council and the city administration . City coun- cil’s consideration of FY 2012-13 budget amendments at their 3/18/2013 meeting will be enlightening. Staff from OFR regularly visits Inkster. City of River Rouge The City of River Rouge operates under a consent agreement which was implemented ef- fective December 15, 2009. For fiscal year ending June 30, 2012, the City had a general fund operating surplus of $1,302,690 or 11% of general fund revenues of $11,989,601. The surplus has reduced the unrestricted accumulated general fund deficit to $1,039,067 or 8.6% of general fund revenues of $11,989,601. The 2012 accumulated deficit is approximately half of the previous year’s deficit so progress is evident. However. the 2012 operating surplus is a result of the re- ceipt of approximately $1.9 million in legal settlements. Had the legal settlements not occurred, the 2012 accumulated deficit would be an estimated $2,900,000. OFR staff visits with River Rouge and feels comfortable that their ongoing efforts to reduce costs, such as the recent implementation of a public safety officer model for combined police and fire services will help the City achieve its FY14 budget objective of balanced reve- nues and expenditures. Implementation of the Personal Property Tax reductions is antici- pated to negatively impact the city. Efforts are underway to prepare more specific estimates of the impacts on both River Rouge and Ecorse, which have relied heavily on the PPT revenues from the Great Lakes steel mill. LOCAL UNITS OF INTEREST City of Hamtramck For fiscal year ending June 30, 2012, the City had a general fund operating shortfall of $3,303,385 which is 22% of general fund revenues of $14,827,148. This deficit eliminated the general fund balance and resulted in an unrestricted accumulated deficit of $753,733 or 5% of general fund revenues. The cause of the imbalance was the result of the loss of reve~ nue due to the expiration of the Poletown tax increment financing agreement and the failure of the City to reduce its expenditures accordingly. xxxEND_PAGE:treasury01_b06_0561_0924_223 Governor Snyder March 15, 2013 Page 9 of 16 e The City has submitted an application for an emergency loan for $3 million. The Depart- ment is reviewing the application to determine if the City qualifies. In addition to the emergency loan, the City is pursuing the issuance of a tax anticipation note to address its cash shortage expected to occur during March 2013. e Late last year, the City Council voted to request a financial review by the State. Prior to initiating the requested review, Treasury asked for and the City has submitted a deficit elimination plan (DEP). The plan relies heavily on the receipt of an emergency loan, an increase in rental inspection fees, and an increase in traffic violation revenues. Given the inadequacy of the DEP, Treasury initiated a preliminary review on Monday; February l1land staff has completed the report. City of Highland Park! e For fiscal year ending June 30, 2012, the City had a general fund operating surplus of $1,293,462 or 12% of general fund revenues of $10,718,332. This increased the City’s unre- stricted general fund balance to $2,199,762 or 20% of general fund revenues. The positive fund balance is a result of the restatement of accrued state revenue from the fiscal year 2011 fi- nancial statements and, in large part, the forgiveness of a $4 million payable due to DTE in 2011. Also a concern is the deficit in the water/sewer fund of approximately $6.7 million and the unfunded pension liability of $13.1 million. The unfunded liability for other post- employment benefits is $26 million. e The City’s updated general fund projections indicate the City will reach a deficit situation during FY 2018. However, these forecasts do not address the possible consequences of var- ious debt coming due within the next two years. Office of Fiscal Responsibility staff is work- ing with local officials to develop and implement cost savings. « Update: The City has discontinued using their water treatment plant after attempting to im- plement MDEQ mandated improvements to the plant. Initial improvements were estimated. at $340,000, but escalated to an estimated $5.9 million after valves and other essential parts of the system were found to be inoperable. The estimated cost to demolish the facility is $3.6 million. Currently, the City is purchasing water from DWSD. Negotiations continue be- tween the City and DWSD with the intent of DWSD operating the City’s water and sewer utility systems. One challenge to finalizing this arrangement is the $8 million the City owes DWSD for sewage treatment. Treasury and City officials expect a proposal during April

FW: Treasury Flint Water Supply Assessment

Jim The purpose of this email is to summarize our discussion from our meeting on February 15" for the Treasury who was not in attendance. They are copied on the email along with the Director and our staff who were present at the meeting. Please review the bullet items below and “Reply to All” if you have any revisions. TYJT is prepared to assist in any way possible to resolve the Flint supply issue. ® TYJT provided DWSD with a copy of the final report titled, “City of Flint Water Supply Assessment, February 2013.” e In addition to the options presented in the report, TYJT discussed the possibility of moving the metering point for Flint to Flint’s WTP and twinning the existing pipeline so that the Flint WTP could be abandoned. The second line would serve as the required redundancy to Flint. Moving the metering point to the Flint WTP would potentially allow for the entire cost of twinning the existing 72-inch main to be covered in DWSD’s rate calculations as a Common to All cost that would get allocated as capital over the entire DWSD wholesale customer base. Since DWSD costs by customer are based on distance and elevation components it was recognized that moving the supply point west would increase the distance, but that the elevation of the plant appeared to be lower than the current supply point at Potter & Baxter. Therefore, the distance component may be off set in some degree by the elevation component. TYJT provided preliminary costs for twinning the pipeline to DWSD to aid in their calculation. DWSD indicated that they would estimate the rate impacts to Flint and get back with TYJT. 66 xxxEND_PAGE:treasury01_b06_0561_0924_163 There was a brief discussion related to whether DWSD would buy the existing Flint main between the existing metering point at Potter & Baxter and the Flint WTP. It was found that a better understanding related to the condition of this main and its value would need to be evaluated. ® The DWSD Board of Water Commissioners is comprised of Detroit representatives and representatives from Oakland, Macomb, and Wayne Counties. Adding a representative from Genesee County was discussed. DWSD needs to look at charter restrictions and the judge’s ruling to determine how this issue could be addressed. e There was concern expressed as to whether KWA representatives are representing the actual opinions of the individual communities within the counties being supplied by DWSD. A discussion of possibly holding presentations of the Treasury findings to the individual communities was discussed. * In general, the meeting was very positive with DWSD willing to address the issues Flint has identified so that the Department can retain Flint as a customer. Dave

Friday Meeting On

From
Jim Fausone
David - This is to confirm Friday's 130pm meeting. Please send me the location. | met with Mr. Dillon today and he said to get with TYJT and discuss the Flint issue. | believe he was giving you and me full authority to meet and discuss. Feel free to call or email him. So, [| would like to bring Director McCormick with me tomorrow and see the new digs and talk about Flint. Does that work? Jim James G. Fausone 79 xxxEND_PAGE:treasury01_b06_0561_0924_149 <image001 jpg> 41700 West Six Mile Road, Suite 101 Northville, Michigan 48168-3460 (248) 380-0000 tel ext. fg (248) 380-3434 fax jfausone@fb-firm com www. flo-firm com Check out our Legal Help for Veterans practice group at www.legalhelpforveterans com or www youtube com/legalhelpforveterans This message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed, and may contain information that is privileged, confidential and/or exempt from disclosure under applicable laws. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by telephone and/or reply to the e-mail message. Thank you. xxxEND_PAGE:treasury01_b06_0561_0924_150 Local Government Continuing Agenda Please submit updates at least one hour before meetings begin Discussion Points: Governor's Monthly Memo update Real estate transfer tax Increased reporting requirements triggers Act 72: Have all cities submitted their requirement since the switch to PA 72? DEP reporting requirements Wayne County DTRE Cities that require Pension and OPEB analysis- We have received 11 actuarial reports from Benton Harbor, Ecorse, Flint, Highland Park, Harper Woods, Inkster, Muskegon Heights, Pontiac, River Rouge, Taylor and Wayne County. Detroit and Hamtramck have not submitted information and a follow up letter will be sent. (ek 1/7/13) EEM salaries Dashboard Software-Two meetings with DTMB scheduled Local Units: Allen Park — Discussed emergency loan with Joyce Parker. A.P. will need loan by the end of Feb. Joyce would like to be approved for S6M and will need $2M immediately to address cash flow. The remaining $4M can be held in escrow if they need it. Joyce is putting together DEP and is looking at the sale of movie studio as well as options to reduce retiree healthcare costs (ss 1/8) Joyce is discussing shared services with Taylor's Mayor Lamarand. Initial focus is on fire. Meeting is scheduled with Andy for 11:30 a.m. Friday, 2.1.13. Joyce plans a review of her DEP and financial plan with OFR and Roger during the week of Feb. 4. (rf 1.30) City of Benton Harbor - Tony Saunders has had positive discussions with the Mayor and a majority of the Commission members. Tony has met with Joe Harris and spent about five hours talking about Joe’s efforts. Pending his start at the end of this week, Tony has been doing impressive due diligence on the City and meeting with many folks. (rf 1.30) The latest emergency loan amount remains uncertain. Tony wants to evaluate the near-term needs before a loan app is finalized. Benton Harbor Area Schools City of Dearborn Heights City of Detroit — After Roger and Ed met with Steve Hilfinger, it appears the three of us are not impressed with the proposal prepared for and submitted by Kriss Andrews. We are arranging to meet with Chris Gannon of Conway MacKenzie to strategize about the proposals and what an execution plan would look like. MEDC is interested in the status of Treasury’s discussions with the City on their plans for PDD, and more broadly, the Treasurer's bigger picture views on the City’s plans for PDD. This would include what if February 19, 2016 xxxEND_PAGE:treasury01_b06_0561_0924_151 anything is included in any agreements relating to milestones for draws on the escrow funds as it relates to PDD reforms. (ek 1/14) Detroit Public Schools — Ecorse — A revised version of the ILA will be presented to Ecorse next week. (RF 1.30) Village of Elberta Flint —- Roger, Randy and Eric met with City officials, County Drain Commissioner and staff, and Rowe Engineering for talk about the KWA. Details were shared regarding the status of the project; the history of the City and the County in dealing with DWSD; opportunities for additional collaboration with the County on water and sewer projects; and how the County could help the City with the higher costs of DWSD water during the first three years of the KWA project (construction). Staff sees KWA as the better long-term solution to the City’s water issues, with the one caveat being the higher DWSD costs. Ed Kurtz is optimistic that those higher costs can be addressed in ways that will not compromise the City’s finances. City staff are convinced that they must plan for no more increases in water rates. (rf 1.30) Handy Township Highland Park City — L.G. is working on a long term plan for the City to have submitted by 2.15.13. (rf 1.30) Highland Park Schools Hamtramck — A preliminary review is recommended. Suzanne will explain. (rf 1.30) Harper Woods — Inkster —- MDEQ is requiring the city to install CSO improvements as part of an order by Judge Fiekens and estimated to cost $20+ million. OFR staff attended a meeting on 12/17 with city staff and MDEQ staff to assess the necessity of the improvements given the city’s current financial condition. (ek 12/17) City of Muskegon Heights — Muskegon Heights Public Schools City of Pontiac — Lou submitted an updated project list. Should be able to go to a TAB in summer. (rf 1.08) Pontiac School District The preliminary review by the Department of Education found the existence of probable financial stress, but recommended that a financial review team not be appointed. As with Benton Harbor Schools, this recommendation is inconsistent with Section 12 of Act 4. (FH) February 19, 2016 xxxEND_PAGE:treasury01_b06_0561_0924_152 City of River Rouge — OFR staff is conducting an analysis of the PPT legislation’s impact to the City. (ek 1/14) Royal Oak Township — Staff was contacted by the newly elected Treasurer re: possible violations of PA 2 and Pa 33. Staff is reviewing documents provided by the Treasurer. (ek 1/8) The FY 2013 budget has not been adopted and there are questions about authorizing payroll on 1/17/13; confidence in township attorney and financial! consultant is low. (ek 1/14) City of Taylor — The City has inappropriately borrowed from other funds to cover up cash flow issues. The deficit is $5M and the feeling is that the council won’t take the deficit seriously but the mayor doesn’t seem able to come up with a reasonable plan either. (ss 1/8) Joyce and Roger will be meeting with the Mayor to discuss service sharing. (rf 1.08) Wayne County — Roger, Ed and OFR staff met with Community Mental Health personnel during December to discuss CMH’s desire to participate in Phase Il via an MOU similar to the one with DHS. OFR staff is preparing both a Statement of Work and a corresponding MOU. (ek 1/8) Phase II contract -The majority of fieldwork required in the contract has been completed. Most of the contract items are more than 90% complete. The Contractor believes that a draft of the report will be completed by the end of the month. The addendum for the delinquent tax revolving fund is approximately 90% complete according to the Contractor. (ek 1/8) Carla Sledge has submitted a draft DEP eliminating the deficit by 2017. DEP is limited on details so will need to discuss its acceptance. The County is also submitting an application for a TAN this month (ss 1/8) Webber Township — OFR staff met with Township Supervisor and OFR staff is preparing an engagement proposal to prepare multiyear forecast for consideration by Township Board. (ek 1/14) Treasury intervened in this case in July and is working with the Township and the property owners toward a settlement. Our perception is that the current assessed values will not be sustained. (RF 11.13) Prior Approval Applications (ss 12/11) Mount Clemens ($5.7M) — under review by LAFD Lansing Township DDA ($7.5M)}-under review by LAFD Village of Prescott ($690,000) — under review by LAFD City of Flint Hospital Building Authority ($71M) — Incomplete application Emergency Loan Applications- cannot exceed $35 million total (ss 9.25 Allen Park-$2 million (application received and under review) February 19, 2016 xxxEND_PAGE:treasury01_b06_0561_0924_153 Benton Harbor-$3 million (application received and under review) Hamtramck - $3 million (application received and under review) Additional Melvindale — Cash flow shortage, budget violations (ss 12/11). OFR staff had a phone conference with the Administrator, City Attorney and Finance Director on 1/11, as part of enhanced DEP reporting requirements. Staff is preparing a proposal for an engagement.(ek 1/14) Lincoln Park — Contacted by the City Manager on 1/11 who stated the city will be out of cash in April. OFR staff is examining most recent audit for possible causes. (ek 1/14) Action Items 12-11 Suzanne is going to send Cary to talk to the Wayne County Prosecutor regarding cuts and TAN conditions Suzanne is reviewing the Brownstown Township DDA audit Tom Saxton and John Barton will notify Jack Martin about the need for a draw request. Releasing $10 million to Detroit after verifying November milestones have been met. John Barton is sending some bullet points about Pontiac to Andy Benton Harbor- Andy meeting with Governor on Wednesday, talking to Ed and Roger Wednesday morning about how to resolve toxic environment before Andy meets with the Governor. | am calling Phil Pierce regarding the Wayne County DTRF am also adding the necessary agenda items to our land bank conference call agenda Additional: Adding Real Estate Transfer Tax to the next meeting agenda Adding Increased Reporting Requirements triggers to the next meeting agenda February 19, 2016 xxxEND_PAGE:treasury01_b06_0561_0924_154 89 (Rev 02-11) STATE OF MICHIGAN RICK SNYDER DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY ANDY DILLON GOVERNOR LANSING STATE TREASURER ANALYSIS REPORT TO: Edward Koryzno, Administrator; Office of Fiscal Responsibility FROM: Eric Cline. Unit Operations Specialist SUBJECT: Updated Flint Water System Status Assessment DATE: February 21, 2013 Analysis Summary On November 26, 2012, the Department of Treasury commissioned the firm of Tucker, Young, Jackson & Tull, Inc. (TYJT) to analyze options for the City of Flint to either remain a customer of the Detroit Water & Sewer Department (DWSD) or to join the Karegnondi Water Authority (K WA) in Genesee County. The overarching purpose of this study was to provide objective analyses to the State Treasurer and to Flint’s Emergency Financial Manager (EFM) in order to secure potable drinking water for the City for the foreseeable future. The Office of Fiscal Responsibility (OFR) has been the lead office representing Treasury in this project. On January 14, 2013, the State Treasurer requested responses to three questions: 1) Show the different, projected construction costs provided by TYJT and by the City of Flint/K WA. If these costs are different, explain why Treasury believes that the projects provided by Flint/K WA are acceptable; 2) identify the construction contingencies included in the TYJT and Flint/KWA projections; and 3) identify the options Flint will utilize in the event of a construction cost overrun or a delay in construction by KWA. This has been a very difficult project to analyze because of the number of proposals to consider, differences of opinion about the conclusions of various engineering analyses that have been conducted, the fact that the analyses are comparing an existing, operational water system with one that has not yet been designed, and conditions within the City of Flint that make it difficult to assess their true water needs. However, despite these difficulties, I believe that KWA presents the best future option to provide potable water for the City of Flint in the future. Long-term, KWA appears to be the cheaper option; the quality of water will almost certainly improve; Genesee County appears willing to assist the City in securing the financial resources for their portion of the project; this project could signify the beginning of better collaboration between the City of Flint and Genesee County; the KWA project has both political and popular support. The following details how this recommendation was arrived at: P.O. BOX 30716 « LANSING, MICHIGAN 48909 wew.michigan gov/treasury « (517) 373-3200 xxxEND_PAGE:treasury01_b06_0561_0924_155 Page 2 Background: On December 21, 2012, staff from TYJT met with representatives from the Department of Treasury and the City of Flint to provide a preliminary report on their findings. At this meeting, TYJT outlined 5 options that they had analyzed. These options were: 1) 100% water provision by the City of Flint Water Plant from its water source of the Flint River; 2) 100% provision of untreated Lake Huron Water by KWA (which would require treatment by the Flint Water Plant); 3) Effective 100% provision of treated drinking water by DWSD; 4) Provision of variable amounts of water from DWSD through the existing Potter & Baxter master meter (this option called for Flint to treat and blend river water into DWSD water in order to reach their daily needs); and 5) Provision of variable amounts of water from DWSD through the 72” Imlay City main (this option also called for Flint to treat and blend river water into DWSD water in order to reach their daily needs). Each of the blending options looked at Flint purchasing 4, 8, or 12 Million Gallons per Day (MGD) from DWSD and blending the balance in river water to achieve their maximum daily water needs of 18 MGD. The Imlay City option also provided for DWSD to sell the 72” main to the City of Flint, which would then become the operational and maintenance responsibility of Flint.

Flint Supply Assessment

Eric In recent discussions with the DWSD Director, the new option of twinning the 72-inch main with another main was discussed. DWSD believes that that twinned line from the Imlay Station to FL-1 (master meter at Potter and Baxter) would be a Commont to All (CTA) cost and therefore allocated over the entire customer base. However, from FL~1 to the WTP would probably not count as a CTA cost. DWSD would consider rolling the cost of the extension from FL-1 to the WTP into Flint's rate. DWSD stated that for them to assess the rate impact of twinning the 72-inch water main, they would need an estimate of the engineering and construction cost. If you would like us to put together this estimate, please let me know. | believe we have the 72-inch pipeline profile in house and that will help us to better estimate the cost associated with river crossings, tunneling, etc. of the actual route. Dave xxxEND_PAGE:treasury01_b06_0561_0924_102 Koryzno, Edward (T. reasury)

FW: Flint Supply Assessment Additional Service

Eric The purpose of this email is to request compensation for the effort that is in addition to the original scope of work. We have identified additional tasks below to describe the work and the level of effort required. The estimated fees for each task would be billed on a time and material basis, not to exceed the total shown for the work described. Task 3.3: This task would include the effort that has been expended thus far in analyzing and responding to additional comments and options presented by the KWA and DWSD. The work has included consultation with Treasury personnel, 96 xxxEND_PAGE:treasury01_b06_0561_0924_071 ie ee analyzing comments provided by KWA to the December 20" presentation, and our detailed response to the KWA comments. All documentation of this work has been provided to Treasury. Estimated Level of Effort: $7,000 Task 3.4: The Treasury has requested that TYJT perform a site visit of the Flint WTP and evaluate the plant as it relates to its capacity to sufficiently treat river water and proposed lake water. This effort would include the services of a process engineer and chemist with expertise in water treatment (see bio below). Work would include review of pertinent reports and documentations as well as monthly operating reports and water quality data. The scheduled site visit would be completed and then a memorandum of findings would be produced and provided to the Treasury. Estimated Level of Effort: $8,500 Task 3.5: This task would be used to cover other services that may be required until the determination is made by the Treasury regarding the best solution for supplying the City of Flint with potable water. This work would be as required and approved by the Treasury to include additional consultation, participation in meetings, and documentation of findings. Estimated Level of Effort: $10,000 Per the contract TYJT will continue to charge services on a time and material basis in accordance with the approved rate schedule, Approval of this additional work is requested. Thank you, Dave Ms. Janice Skadsen’s Bio: Ms. Skadsen is an environmental scientist and project manager with extensive experience in water quality issues, particularly as they relate to drinking water systems, including water treatment processes, source water issues, distribution water quality, and regulatory development and compliance. She was a water quality manager for the City of Ann Arbor for 13 years and has a thorough knowledge of water quality needs from the client’s perspective. As Ann Arbor’s water quality manager, Ms. Skadsen works for the national firm, CDM Smith and provides her expertise to their clients for projects throughout the country. 97 xxxEND_PAGE:treasury01_b06_0561_0924_072 a __ ee, Nathan priaine ae 2 *20km a Weta. _ —s oe pees wel “Hun lost. Aa ML —2fele yb DesecDine i. Fatt dtd te aged nw Dew oar cE ———————— Aceh "eA Us OT a VY THe an coe | IQ ad ol ih ad ! ee) nan Us, 0 xxxEND_PAGE:treasury01_b06_0561_0924_073 Flint Water Supply Questions Office of Fiscal Responsibility January 24, 2013 . Please describe your latest cost estimate of construction. When will the intake be let for bids? Is it still estimated to cost $23,000,000? Why is KWA the most cost effective option for the City of Flint? Please describe. . Identify the construction contingencies included in the project and why you believe your estimate is accurate than Tucker, Youngs? . How will Flint pay for any costs, overruns, or a delay in construction by KWA? . IF Flint joins KWA, do you still intend on purchasing Flint’s 72” main to supply the Genesee County System? . Will Flint be able to finance its water plant capital upgrades of approximately $5,000,000 by using Genesee County G.O. bonds? Will Flint’s share of KWA financing be provided by Genesee County G.O. Bonds? . What emergency power backup is provided by the KWA project? xxxEND_PAGE:treasury01_b06_0561_0924_074 7. Does Flint need to purchase 30% of the KWA capacity if Flint repairs the water leakage in other their distribution system (estimated at 30%)? 8. What does Genesee County believe will be their finished water cost to customers once its treatment plant is complete and online? How much cheaper is this than Detroit? 9, Can Flint’s water plant, if joined with KWA, treat both lake water and river water, which is extremely important if it is provided as emergency backup water to KWA? Will KWA provide funding for this? 10. Would KWA purchase Detroit’s 72” main if given the opportunity? Ifso, why? 11. How does Flint plan on paying the premium charge for water from DWSD while the KWA system is under construction? xxxEND_PAGE:treasury01_b06_0561_0924_075 Cline, Richard (T reasury)

Flint Supply Assessment

Eric To follow up on our discussion yesterday about Flint now not wanting to blend their water, | took a look at the rates assuming a parallel line was installed along the 72-inch route. If DWSD agrees that it is a Common to All (CTA) cost then there should be no impact on Flint’s rate directly. With this assumption | took out the cost of operating the Flint WTP, since it would no longer be needed for back up to the 72-inch line. The summary is shown below. As you can see, the 18 MGD option from DWSD would then be less cost than the KWA costs (their estimate or ours). Dave [| __ Option | Costs through 2042 Flint WTP Only 590,441,893 e DWSD 18 MGD Max Day at P&B DWSD 8 MGD Max Day at Imlay KWA 10/31/12 Update DWSD 8 MGD Max Day at P&B KWA-1 DWSD 12 MGD Max Day at Imlay DWSD 12 MGD Max Day at P&B KWA -2 wereuwnyyyYYyY uy wm 605,004,098 634,795,488 649,775,166 672,671,705 707,279,715 725,576,803 762,110,308 766,784,313 OAnNnN DHMH PWD 106 xxxEND_PAGE:treasury01_b06_0561_0924_058 Koryzno, Edward (Treasury)

RE: Draft Flint Supply Assessment.Questions

Dave, Thanks for the information. | will be in-touch. Eric Cline | Unit Operations Specialist - Office of Fiscal Responsibility State of Michigan | Michigan Department of Treasury 430 W. Allegan Street, 3rd Floor | Lansing, MI 48922 (517) 335-2078 | [email protected] CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail, and any attachments, 1s for the sale use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain information that is confidential and protected from disclosure under the law. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail, and delete/destroy all copies of the original message and attachments Thank you.

RE: Draft Flint Supply Assessment.Questions

Eric 116 xxxEND_PAGE:treasury01_b06_0561_0924_023 Sorry for the delayed response; in addition to the holidays we also moved our office. We are just getting things organized. Below is my response to your questions. Please review and let me know if you have any questions. Additionally, as we discussed at the presentation. We will wait to hear back from you regarding the January 10° meeting with Flint and what adjustments will be needed to the schedule. However, we will begin drafting the report.

Draft Flint Supply Assessment.Questions

Importance: High Dave, Good afternoon. | hope you had a good holiday and are planning on a good New Year. Thanks for the presentation information. Just to follow-up, it appears that no additional presentation on the 15th is being asked for. Should that change, } will let you know. | have some additional questions | want to clarify with you. Some of these are just internal questions we have and want to make sure we are interpreting your presentation information correctly. | have highlighted my specific questions for clarity. ® You should have received a copy of a letter from DWSD to Flint dated December 21%. As | review the options that they provide Flint, | note some differences with what you outlined as the DWSD options for Flint. Have you taken these changes Into account? If not, what Is the impact these “latest” proposals will have? Yes, we did receive a copy from the Director dated, December 21%. The proposals appear to be similar to what we presented for the 18 MGD maximum day customer from P&B and from Imlay. However, the attached exhibits referenced were not attached for us to review the specific rates. Overall, | have some broad, “strategic” questions: e Anticipating a return of future growth to the City, what is the maximum MGD DWSD could provide to Flint? What about KWA? The overall question is whether either entity could provide more water to Flint than is anticipated if they needed to. Regarding the KWA, we do not have specifics on the route and profile so we can’t do a hydraulic analysis to determine the additional capacity that could be provided by their proposed system. However, prior hydraulic analyses of the existing 72-inch main has shown that in excess of 90 MGD can be supplied to Flint by DWSD. ® On the flip-side, if decline continues in Flint, what happens if Flint needs less water than projected? What would that do to the financial projections? Regarding both proposals we need to know the volume of water purchased to do a reasonable estimate. With regards to KWA, since the percentage of the water supplied would be reduced, we would need to confirm that their capital investment obligation would be reduced accordingly based on Flint’'s percentage of the total volume. 117 xxxEND_PAGE:treasury01_b06_0561_0924_024 e Given Flint’s current financial situation, did you analyze the City’s ability to actually sell bonds to make any of these improvements? As we indicated in our presentation, this is a concern. It has been assumed that the KWA bonds would be backed by Genesee County; however, Flint would still need to bond for the improvements at their WTP. e It appears that the overall expenditures required to cover any of the outlined options are going to require water rates to rise almost annually. Has there been any analysis on what rates might look like and/or what the capacity of the public to pay these rates might be? We were not requested to analyze the capacity of the public to pay the water rates, so | can’t respond to that question. However, we did include the rate increase in all of our scenarios. It is shown on our spreadsheets as, “Escalation/Inflation Rate.” Specifically: e What Is the total cost for Flint to buy the 72” line fram DWSD? | see a capital cost on that option of $4.7- million. Does that include the 72” line? Related to this, do we know what the projected lifespan of that line is? What would the replacement cost be? A question we are having is whether Flint would have the financial and/or operational ability to maintain this line. Also, am unsure, once you account for O&M costs and bond payments, if there is enough overall benefit to Flint owning that line is If they remain with DWSD. The $4.7M shown is for the purchase of the 72-inch line. It is the best estimate DWSD has provided so far, but the actual cost would be dependent on negotiations between DWSD and Flint. The bond payments are included in our analysis. DWSD has also offered to “role” the cost into the annual Flint water rate. Our analysis did indicate that the Imlay option was less expensive than for most of the other options. The pipe itself is a pre-stressed concrete cylinder pipe (PCCP) that has excellent life expectancy. Assuming that the water main was installed in the late 60’s | would suspect that the life expectancy to be beyond the planning period we analyzed. e It appears to me that the O&M costs for the Flint Water Plant are very high. If Flint were to continue to buy water from DWSD, other than for a back-up, is there any reason they could not avoid those costs by mothballing the plant and having DWSD provide 100% finished water to them? The issue has been related to MDEQ requiring that Flint have a backup supply in case their service is interrupted by a loss of the 72-inch main. Flint is supplied off a single line and that is why the redundancy is required. e Regarding KWA, perhaps | missed this explanation, but why are the options for KWA for 12 MGD as opposed to the option for 18 MGD? The 12 MGD is the daily average. KWA has indicated that their system can provide the maximum day demand to Flint as well. e Is there any financial sense for Flint to close its plant and KWA builds theirs bigger to accommodate them? That option was not investigated and we do not know the associated cost of the Genesee County plant. However, each community was pointing to an inter-agency agreement that wauld allow them each to provide a backup supply to the other. That would not be possible with just one plant. e Regarding your spreadsheet for the KWA Proposal 2, | note that it appears you are using numbers ($7.758- million) from Proposal 1 in calculating some of the capital costs. ts this correct? 118 xxxEND_PAGE:treasury01_b06_0561_0924_025 Yes, this is the $7.1M projected in the 2009 report that was adjusted for inflation at 3%/year for three years. | recognize what you provided was a preliminary report, but these are some questions | noted as your information was reflected upon. | would appreciate your comments on these questions. Please note that | will not be in the office again until January 3, so please copy Randall Byrne, OFR Manager, on any responses. Regards, Eric Cline | Unit Operations Specialist - Office of Fiscal Responsibility State of Michigan | Michigan Department of Treasury 430 W. Allegan Street, 3rd Floor | Lansing, MI 48922 (517) 335-2078 | [email protected] CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail, and any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s} and may contain information that is confidential and protected from disclosure under the law. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, or distribution ts prohibited. if you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail, and delete/destroy all copies of the original message and attachments Thank you. aoenel Original Message---~

Re: Indefinite-scope, Indefinite-delivery Contract Number 00383: City of Flint Water

Dave - please see attachment, which summarizes the information you are seeking. You should be aware of several items: * The allocated costs of service and rates computed in the attachment follow an “all else being equal" application of the current (FY 2012-13) DWSD unit costs. This is consistent with the figures we've been discussing with Flint representatives in one on one meetings, Whenever these service requirements actually get applied in a proposed rate, the lower SYSTEM units associated with lower FLINT units (blending, max day, Genesee, etc.) will raise the unit costs for ALL customers, creating a moderate impact for ALL customers, We've acknowledged this to Flint representatives in our discussions. Frankly, with all of the other moving parts (associated with other customer contract renegotiations, changing revenue requirements from the new organization structure, etc.) - we are of the opinion that this approach is the most appropriate option. e As such, in our discussions with Flint we've taken care to identify these figures as hypothetical results indicative of rate calculations, as opposed to firm offers. e Scenarios 3 and 4 (average day service only) have not been part of our discussions with Flint to date. e As Sue mentioned, our most recent discussions with Flint have introduced a potential rate “credit” for them providing their own redundancy and/or for DWSD reserving wheeling rights in the event that Flint elects to move their delivery point to Imlay. These elements are not part of the existing DWSD rate structure and are less easily quantified. e We've not included any "rate" impact of the sale of the 72-inch main to Flint, nor have we been definitive with how that would work in our discussions with Flint. We contemplate that the transaction could be negotiated in a manner that takes the items mentioned in the prior bullet into consideration. We are scheduled to have further conversations with Flint on these concepts tomorrow. T trust that this information is responsive to your requests. Let me know if you have any questions. Bart Foster President THE FOSTER GROUP (913) 345-1410 (913) 345-1640 fax (913) ell bfoster@fostergrouptic com xxxEND_PAGE:treasury01_b03_0010_0378_280 Please note that the information in this message along with any attachments are intended for the exclusive use of the addressee and may contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not forward, copy or print the message or its attachments: notify me at the above address and delete this message and any attachments. Thank you.

RE: Indefinite-scope, Indefinite-delivery Contract Number 00383: City of Flint Water Supply Assessment

To
Raphael Chirolla
Raphael Per our conversation please run the following two scenarios for supplying only Flint from Potter/Baxter and from Imlay. The first assumes that DWSD will provide 2/3 rds of the average and maximum day demands, while the second option assumes that the Flint WTP will supply anything above the average day demand requirements. 1. Annual Volume: 390,374 MCF (8 MGD Average Day Demand) Maximum Day: 12 MGD Peak Hour: 12 MGD 2. Annual Volume: 390,374 MCF (8 MGD Average Day Demand) Maximum Day: 8 MGD Peak Hour: 8 MGD Let me know if you have any questions. Dave

Re: Indefinite-scope, Indefinite-delivery Contract Number 00383: City of Flint Water Supply Assessment

From
Raphael Chirolla
Shown below are the fiscal year volumes requested in 4 (1 through 3 will follow): Water Volume 10 Year History Flint ___| 2003] _ 1636751 xxxEND_PAGE:treasury01_b03_0010_0378_281 Water Volume 10 Year History [2o04]_1522280.1] 2005 1§24720.5 [ 2008) 1369646. 2011 1310873 1192686.8 SOCWA added Bloomfield Hills to their service area in 2010 and Bloomfield Township in 2012. | Water Volume 10 Year History WATER_DISTRICT YEAR Southeastern Oakland County Water Authority} 2005 1333539.4 [Southeastern Oakland County Water Authority| 2006] __1297214.8 Southeastern Oakland County Water Authority] 2009] __1133789.8| Southeastern Oakland County Water Authority] 2012 1496550.2| [Water Volume 10 Year History WATER_DISTRICT YEAR |SumOfVOLUME} psilanti Communities Utilities Authority| 2003] _713830.4| Ypsilanti Communities Utilities Authority] 2004] ___—_—-668886.6| Ypsilanti Communities Utilities Authority] 2005] 6854473] Ypsilanti Communities Utilities Authority] 2006 ___.659786.7| Ypsilanti Communities Utilities Authority [Ypsilanti Communities Utilities Authority} 2008 628582.6 Ypsilant’ Communities Utilities Authority Ypsilanti Communities Utlities Authority] 2010] ___—_—547256.9| Ypsilanti Communities Utilities Authority] 2011 514036.1 Ypsilanti Communities Utilities Authority | 2012 530966

FW: R. Eric Cline

Dave Below is Eric’s contact information: Ph: 517-373-2078 Cliner1 @michigan.gov> Edward B. Koryzno, Jr. | Administrator - Office of Fiscal Responsibility State of Michigan | 430 W. Allegan Street, 1st Floor | Lansing, MI 48922 (517) 373-4415 | (517) 373-0633 (fax) KoryznoE P Think Green! Don't print this e-mail unless you need to. CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail, and any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain information that is confidential and protected from disclosure under the law. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail, and delete/destroy ali copies of the original message and attachments. Thank you 138 xxxEND_PAGE:treasury01_b03_0010_0378_314 Koryzno, Edward (T: reasury)

Showing 1-25 of 30