Michael Schock

EPA Researcher at Environmental Protection Agency / EPA

Also known as Michael Glasgow, Michael, Schock, Mike

19

Emails

Sep 2014–Nov 2015

Archive range

19 emails found.

(No subject)

cole; Dykema, Linda D. (DHHS); Wells, Eden (DHHS); edwardsm; Krisztian, George (DEQ); jmikewright; Gerald (Jed) Natzke; James Henry; Jamie Gaskin; John O'Brien; JoAnne Herman; Kirk Smith; Kevin J. Keane; Lawrence Reynolds; Laura Sullivan; Wright, Michael; [email protected]; Prysby, Mike (DEQ); Lawrence Reynolds; Mike Lane; Natasha Henderson; Norb Birchmeier; Robert Bincsik; Pete Levine; [email protected]; Sean Kammer; Russell Hudson; Busch, Stephen (DEQ); [email protected]; Thompson, Sheryl D. (DHHS); Samir Matta; Warren Green; [email protected]; Karen Weaver; Prof. Susan Masten

(No subject)

Higgins; donna. cole; Dykema, Linda D. (DHHS); Wells, Eden (DHHS); edwardsm; Krisztian, George (DEQ); jmikewright; Gerald (Jed) Natzke; James Henry; Jamie Gaskin; John O'Brien; JoAnne Herman; Kirk Smith; Kevin J. Keane; Lawrence Reynolds; Laura Sullivan; Wright, Michael; [email protected]; Prysby, Mike (DEQ); Lawrence Reynolds; Mike Lane; Natasha Henderson; Norb Birchmeier; Robert Bincsik; Pete Levine; [email protected]; Sean Kammer; Russell Hudson; Busch, Stephen (DEQ); [email protected]; Thompson, Sheryl D. (DHHS); Samir Matta; Shawn Patrick McElmurry; Warren Green; [email protected]; Karen Weaver

(No subject)

Higgins; donna. cole; Dykema, Linda D. (DHHS); Wells, Eden (DHHS); edwardsm; Krisztian, George (DEQ); jmikewright; Gerald (Jed) Natzke; James Henry; Jamie Gaskin; John O'Brien; JoAnne Herman; Kirk Smith; Kevin J. Keane; Lawrence Reynolds; Laura Sullivan; Wright, Michael; [email protected]; Prysby, Mike (DEQ); Lawrence Reynolds; Mike Lane; Natasha Henderson; Norb Birchmeier; Robert Bincsik; Pete Levine; [email protected]; Sean Kammer; Russell Hudson; Busch, Stephen (DEQ); [email protected]; Thompson, Sheryl D. (DHHS); Samir Matta; Shawn Patrick McElmurry; Warren Green; [email protected]; Karen Weaver

Corrosion Control Treatment Example Study

Darren and Mike, The City of Flint and their engineering consultant would like EPA to provide a previously approved example of an optimal corrosion control treatment evaluation completed for a water treatment plant when full scale testing of the new source water was not available. This is in an effort to assist the City of Flint regarding the required corrosion control treatment evaluation of the City’s future change in source water to Lake Huron supplied by the Karegnondi Water Authority at the City of Flint Water Treatment Plant, as outlined in the Department’s October 30, 2015 letter to the City, and in accordance with the November 3, 2015, EPA Memorandum Lead and Copper Rule Requirements for Optimal Corrosion Control Treatment for Large Drinking Water Systems, both attached. While the later part of the EPA memo discusses systems that plan to disconnect from a supplier that had installed corrosion control treatment to determine the OCCT for the new source (and in the case of the City of Flint, new treatment), the guidance document that is referenced in this memo appears to focus only on existing systems where full-scale treatment evaluation is possible, with no apparent guidance for new systems or systems that disconnect from their supplier prior to their source and treatment change. Your assistance regarding this matter is greatly appreciated. Stephen Busch, P.E. MDEQ Lansing District Coordinator Office of Drinking Water and Municipal Assistance Lansing and Jackson District Supervisor 517-643-2314 [email protected] xxxEND_PAGE:deq18_b217_1652_1652_1

RE: Flint WTP PH2 SEG4 - Corrosion Control

his will surimarize our phone conversation of 10/19 and provide clarification regarding the previous comments. The City of Flint converted back te purchasing of Detroit Water and Sewerage Departrnent water on Friday Gctober 16, 2615. No indications of upset in the distribution systern have been reported to date. Detroit Water and Sewerage Department (DW5D} has confirmed the use of Innephas “Phosphoric Acid 7596 Technical” product which is NSF Standard 60 certified with a maximum allowable feed rate of 13 mg/L as product. The City of Flint will need to supaly a similar phosphoric acid product, NSF Standard 60 approved with allowable maximum dosage. DASE supplied water is currently dosed at 0.39 mg/L as PU1.2 mae/fl as PO4) slightly above DWSD’s OCCT requirement o dose a minimum of 0.9 mg/L as PO4 and have a minimum plant tap residual of 0.8 mg/l as PO4. DWSD plant tap residuals have been shown to consistently be at 0.39 mg/L as P OL2 me/b as PO4), In addition water supply entering Flirt has been tested and so far shown to contain approximately 0.39 me/i as POL? me/E as POS) as well, fo achieve pipe passivation Flint will boost orthophosphate dosage to establish @ rninimurn distribution residual of 1.0 mae/Las P (3.1 mg/h as POS), The chemical feed systern will be sized to achieve a dose up to 2.0 mg/L as Pi6.. mg/L as POd) in case orthophosphate foss is observed. Fling will continue Water Quality Parameter Monitoring in accordance with the LOR at the same 25 distribution locations used under the Flint River, in addition LO of these locations alsa serve as total colifarm monitoring sites, including disinfectant residual, and Flirt will be told te, for the purpase of assessing water stability, conduct water quality parameter monitoring along with turbidity and iron sarapling will be at these 10 locations ora weekly basis as suggested, This wil also ensure that a minimiurn recornmended ph levels are being maintained throughout the system, EPA ORD staff will provide instructions ta the City of Flint for creating test loans to help confirm effectiveness of the corrosion control treatment. This data will help in rebuilding public trust. The County Health Department and Mi Department of Health and Human Services will be conducting blood lead level esting of children in Flint. Chifdren with elevated blood lead levels will be offered exposure assessments of their homes, These assessrnants should inchide the contribution of lead fram service line and interior plurnbing sources. Such diagnostic testing should help further substantiate the effectiveness of corrasian contral reatment Procedures recommended by EPA should be shared with the Michigan Department of Health and Human Services, The University of Michigan in Ann Arbor had previously expressed interest in assisting the City of Flint. Both the Department of Chil and Environmental Engineering, and Schaal of Public Health should be contacted to determine if hat interest still exists with potential to assist in both test loop construction and monitoring, and exposure assessment monitoring in homes. Any water analysis should occur at a certified laboratory. xxxEND_PAGE:deq21_b122_0406_0411_2 The City will be required ta complete a6 month round of lead and copper compliance monitoring in the January ~ tune 2016 period, The City continues to offer all residents a first draw lead sarmple collection and analysis. Any additional staggered monitoring suggestions should be brought before the City’s Technical Advisory Committee. Criteria for deerning the treatment optimized must be established as the LOR only requires cornpliance with the lead and copper Action Levels once this determination has been made. The City of Flint is continuing to digitize service line index card records into a Geographic information System to confirm the location of lead service lines. EPA can provide additional information to the City regarding a sampling procedure to verify lead service line sites. The City’s engineering corsultant will need te evaluate RWA water in conjunction with the City of Flint treatment plant processes to determine any necessary adjustrnents in optimized carrasion contral treatment prior to initiating service te customin's. Full scale testing rnay not be feasible. Stephen Busch, PLE. MDEO Lansing (istrict Coordinater Office of Drinking Water and Municinal Assistance Lansing and Jackson District Supervisor BE? -643-2344 [email protected]

(No subject)

Walling;donna. cole;Dykema, Linda D. (DHHS);Krisztian, George (DEQ);Gerald ed) NatzkeJamie Gaskin;Jason Lorenz;jmikewrightJoAnne Herman;John O'Brien;Kirk Sullivan;Michael Glasgow;Wright, Michael;Prysby, Mike (DEQ);Natasha Henderson;Norb Birchmeier;Pete Levine;Robert Hudson;Samir Matta;Sean Kammer;Busch, Stephen (DEQ);Warren Green;Wurfel, Brad (DEQ);Anthony Chubb;Kevin Keane;Valacak, Mark

RE: Flint schematic

Hi Al: ff you need a schematic for the Flint water treatment plant, there’s one included in the August 2015 OEL report posted on City of Flint's website. Sourte = xxxEND_PAGE:deq21_b571_1675_1677_1 FERS: CHLOREE BAW WSTES Li LIFT OoeMATION #8P1D SCREENS PUMP REE HIE Jae: & CATO REGAREOMATION SEF TENS SEUAL @EGIS FILTSSTIRE WEIR FINISHES WATES 2 DAC ONER 12° SANG SHAMEER REGERVOK ep WATER TREATME! FRGCESS Dlés STEN CE EATER TREATS Hope that helps, Andrea Porter Environmental Engineer Ground Water & Orinking Water Branch US. EPA, Region 5 (WG-155} 77 Wi. Jackson Blvd, Chicage, 1 60604 Phone: 342-886-4427 Fepu 312-697-2656

RE: more pdfs

Jennifer; Thank you $0 much! Would you happen to know Hf any other repart has, or that you might have sornewhere, a currently-valid process schematic for the entire set of treatments done at the Flint plant? it would be helpful to have a better picture of where things like softening, tyne of coagulant and GAC fit inte the picture. There are several potential interrelationshins that would affect the successfulness of the phosphate treatrnent pronosed and dosage, and the instability cause by the mafor chemistry change fram Detroit finisned water (which |undarstand was from their Lake Huron-fed plant}. ~ Mike

more pdfs

April 2015 MOR is not on the website. xxxEND_PAGE:deq16_b5_0892_4900_4007 ONIdvINd HILVWM GAHSINIa VINOMINY SNOUGAHNY SUFILLAS FLW Ted NOLWINIIO TS FOVLS aadHL YIWA 10d Gi¥ NOLL INDO TS YAWATOd GV LNVINDVOD AGHMOTHS Jiddss HIOAUTSAY YZLVM GAHSINID SLVATNSIa HEUuGOS SNIMO'THS NISV@ ONINFLAOS NOIMLOZANISIC AN HSV VGOS | YaWATOd FGIXO WHITWO NOILYNOZO | ONIdiNNd HSVMMOVE YSLVMAIV HLIM NOMVaL Td WIGAN TWN NOILVNOGYVoFd 3IXOID NOgavo SNFFdIS YALYM AAVe YaLM MV IILVAIFHIS SSAIOUd INV Id ANFWLVINL YILVM GaSOd0dd INIT# 40 ALIS xxxEND_PAGE:deq16_b5_0892_4900_4008

Flint MI: LCR Enforcement Issues

Mike, Darren, Jeff, Eric, Carol and Miguel and R5 MI/Enforcement personnel (as listed on the R5 webpage). In this e-mail, | am making you aware of what we know regarding the Flint lead situation. 1) They do not have an approved lead sampling pool. Only 13 of the lowest lead sampled homes from 2014, were resampled in 2015.. : . The homes sampling high in 2014, were not seked to be resampled. At best, their program is sending out sampling bottles at random across the city. xxxEND_PAGE:deq26_b081_0778_0781_1 FS 2) This message exemplifies the type of site selection, that they are doing to satisfy their high risk LCR monitoring pool - site. That is, none. They are not even hiding it. htt ://www 3) Furthermore, in a video now on the ACLU website, at the end of the interview, Mike Glasgow (int LCR Prose Notes what is perfectly obvious from looking at the MDEQ FOIA materials. e threw out bottles. everywhere je just. to- collect. as. many-as we can, just to hit our nu usttarn‘tn in every rhe we get in.” . Moreover, they do not have the records to show the homes have lead pipe. “we:are still looking for 21 el See video here. Start at 4 minutes and 13 seconds to see the admission. lene serve 4) On top of that, according to my count, MDEQ covered up no tener than 5 violations in the 2015 sample round. Nat include: 5 and we j a) Technical violation in that what they now stamp as the “draft” report (attached) is late (the signed date is 7/28/2015). It was due 7/10/2015. The final “revised” report is dated 8/20/2015 (also attached), which is 40 days late. b) Although 87 sites from 2014 were not resampled, no written justification for the site changes was provided in the FOIA materials, and this is required by law. The statement given today by Flint, that residents were not resampled because they did not want to participate, is contradicted by my conversations with residents. . ¢) In the original 71 samples Flint submitted late, the lead 90%ile action level was exceeded. MDEQ took the initiative to invalidate 2 samples, dropping Flint below the Action Level. Flint never requested in writing that any of the samples be invalidated (see the comments written in the box of page 1, FOIA 15-585). Mike Glasgow says that the 2 high samples were deleted based on me conference call. Only the high samples were scrutinized for meeting the sample pool criteria. No low samples were investigated. | have the e-mails. 4) The “Draft 7/28/2015” and “revised 8/20/2015” LCR reports, on page 1, check boxes that note Tier 1 sites are not used. MDEQ asks no questions about that. In video Mike admits he has no knowledge of what sites actually have lead pipe or not. 5) Flint did not achieve the minimum number of samples as determined before the sampling round. In his e-mail Mike Glasgow (see below, and see FLINT LCR FOR FOIA...pdf) acknowledges this will be a technical violation. The draft LCR- clearly indicates that the minimum was not achieved. MDEQ responds “we are discussing options” to handle this technical violation. In the August 20" revised final report, even this technical violation magically disappears (see comments box on page 1....). xxxEND_PAGE:deq26_b081_0778_0781_2