Correspondence between

Hi Bob, dust a quick note: fH restrict the analytic fle to each child's first positive test every calendar year. Cristin

Hello Nancy and Bob, it turns out that adding in the additional two years of data did not change the results of the analysis: there does appear to he a higher proportion of EBLL last surnmer than usual. | wrote up my methods and results in the attached brief, just in case arryone asks for specifics, Have a good night! Cristin

Quick question: Does elevated mean >S or >10 ue/dh?

beh

Okay, thanks, Bob. Hf incorporate the previous years and put the new results into a publisher document with some description of what’s going on in the chart. We'll find out ff this changes the results!

Cristin, toan safely say | don’t understand it without same explanation. However, late yesterday Nancy and | decided to take a look two years farther back to see how they fit with the recent years. Please see attached, which i just finished this marning. Sorry / didn’t have this for you yesterday before you did the analysis. Would this new information change the analysis? 2 xxxEND_PAGE:dhhs03_b0833_3004_3007_2 003006 Thariks, Bob

Thanks Cristin!

xxxEND_PAGE:dhhs02_b0237_0797_0885_16 000813 Okay, thanks, Bob. I'll incorporate the previous years and put the new results into a publisher document with some description of what's going on in the chart. We'll find out if this changes the results!