Correspondence among

Hello Nancy and Bob, it turns out that adding in the additional two years of data did not change the results of the analysis: there does appear to he a higher proportion of EBLL last surnmer than usual. | wrote up my methods and results in the attached brief, just in case arryone asks for specifics, Have a good night! Cristin

Okay, thanks, Bob. Hf incorporate the previous years and put the new results into a publisher document with some description of what’s going on in the chart. We'll find out ff this changes the results!

Cristin, toan safely say | don’t understand it without same explanation. However, late yesterday Nancy and | decided to take a look two years farther back to see how they fit with the recent years. Please see attached, which i just finished this marning. Sorry / didn’t have this for you yesterday before you did the analysis. Would this new information change the analysis? 2 xxxEND_PAGE:dhhs03_b0833_3004_3007_2 003006 Thariks, Bob

xxxEND_PAGE:dhhs02_b0237_0797_0885_16 000813 Okay, thanks, Bob. I'll incorporate the previous years and put the new results into a publisher document with some description of what's going on in the chart. We'll find out if this changes the results!