Correspondence between

Emails where every selected person appears as a sender, recipient, or copied participant.

RE: Flint OER - Response to May 2015 TTHM Sampling

Jeff, Brent, Michael Attached is DEQ’s summary of TTHM concentrations for the past 4 quarters including the LRAA and OEL calculation. This table is aligned correctly between locations (addresses) and site | codes and needs to be used by city. Michael Pryshy, P.E. District Engineer Office of Drinking Water and Municipal Assistance 517 290-8817

Flint OER - Response to May 2015 TTHM Sampling

Hi Mike, On behalf of the City of Flint, attached is a PDF version of the latest Operational Evaluation Report required in response to the TTHM violation in May 2015. Hard copies will be sent out today. Jeffrey R. Hansen Senior Project Manager Lockwood, Andraws & Newnam, inc. CONFIDENTIALITY AND PRIVILEGE NOTICE: This email communication, including any and all attachments, (collectively, this “Communication”), is intended solely for the person(s) to whom it is addressed. This Communication may contain information that is privileged, confidential and/or proprietary. Any unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this Communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this Communication in error, please contact the sender immediately and destroy any and all copies of this Communication. xxxEND_PAGE:deq16_b5_0892_4900_3987 02310 — City of Flint 3” Quarter 2015 TTHMs August 28, 2015 TTHM Results (mg/L) 11/20/14 | 2/17/15 | 5/18/15 | 8/18/15 | LRAA OEL DBP1 McDonalds 0.059 0.0162 | 0.0514 | 0.0755 | 0.050 | 0.055 3719 Davison DBP2 Liquor Palace 3302 | 0.033 0.0168 | 0.0635 | 0.0532 | 0.042 | 0.047 South Dort Highway DBP3 North Flint Auto 0.041 0.0149 | 0.0452 | 0.0426 | 0.036 | 0.036 6204 North Saginaw St. DBP4 University Market 0.094 0.0245 | 0.0598 | 0.0706 | 0.062 | 0.056 2501 Flushing Road DBP5 Taco Bell 0.034 0.0151 | 0.0547 | 0.0619 | 0.042 | 0.049 3606 Corunna Road DBP6 Rite-Aid Pharmacy 0.054 0.0192 | 0.0605 | 0.0595 | 0.048 | 0.050 5018 Clio Road DBP7 Salem Housing 0.050 0.0285 | 0.0727 | 0.0903 | 0.060 | 0.070 3216 MLK Boulevard DBP8 BP Gas Station 0.036 0.0199 | 0.0461 | 0.0549 | 0.039 | 0.044 822 South Dort Highway xxxEND_PAGE:deq16_b5_0892_4900_3988

RE: Flint THM

Mike, | received the attached info from the City. | wanted to confirm the right numbers are lined up with the right sample sites since we had problems with that before and also because | thought you told me Salem Housing was the highest location at site 7, However, we have Salem housing as site 6. xxxEND_PAGE:deq04_b076_2599_2966_234 Please let me know if the attached table is correct compared to your records. Jeffrey R. Hansen Senior Project Manager Lockwacd, paprsite &Newnam,Inc. Ine. RLEG A DALY COMPANY 1311 South Linden Road, Suite B » Flint, MI 48532 T 810.820.2682 810.333.3201 www.lan-inc.com * [email protected]

RE: Flint-GAC 2 of 2

Hi Mike, | was curious why you require an anti-syphon valve in this case? | can see it at the intermediate point since it is before filtration, but the water in the weir chamber is completely treated and ready to drink. It seems very unlikely that the treated water would backflow into the chlorine pipe, but even if it did why would it matter since it is drinkable? Jeffrey R. Hansen Senior Project Manager

RE: Flint GAC 2 of 2

Jeff, | have reviewed the preliminary plans for the GAC addition for the Flint WTP filters. | do not have any major concerns with the preliminary plans. | did note the tap off the existing chlorine solution line immediately west of Filter No. 6 that will convey liquid chlorine to the new feed point within the first bay of the weir chamber. In our review of the intermediate chlorination feedpoint (March 2104), we called for an anti-syphon valve to be installed on the feedline prior to the application point in the trough (just prior to filtration). Since this proposed tap is upstream of the anti-syphon device, an additional anti-syphon device will need to be provided on the proposed chlorine solution line prior to injection within the proposed drop-pipe. If the device is to be located within the first weir chamber, it will need to be above the high water level. | will be out on extended medical leave beginning tomorrow. | could be back as early as sometime next week or as late as early July. For timely permit issuance, the final submittal should be directed to Steve Busch. Michael Prysby, P.E. District Engineer Office of Drinking Water and Municipal Assistance 517 290-8817

Flint GAC 1 of 2

Mike, Attached is our revised basis of design. | am going to send preliminary drawings in a separate email due to file sizes. Thanks, Jeffrey R. Hansen Senior Project Manager Lockwood, Andrews & Neveram, ire. 1311 South Linden | lint, MI 48532 T 810.820.2682 CONFIDENTIALITY AND PRIVILEGE NOTICE: This email communication, including any and all attachments, (collectively, this “Communication”), is intended solely for the person(s) to whom it is addressed. This Communication may contain information that is privileged, confidential and/or proprietary. Any unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this Communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this Communication in error, please contact the sender immediately and destroy any and all copies of this Communication. xxxEND_PAGE:deq16_b5_0892_4900_0314 BASIS OF DESIGN FILTER MEDIA REPLACEMENT WITH GRANULAR ACTIVATED CARBON (GAC CITY OF FLINT 1. GENERAL DESCRIPTION As one measure to assist with the reduction of total trihalomethanes (TTHM) in the water system the City of Flint (City) proposes to replace the existing anthracite media with GAC for each of the 12 filters within the water treatment plant (WTP). Two layers of media were installed in the filters in 2005: 12” of sand and 18” of anthracite. Recent investigations have shown that the sand installed does not meet the original design specifications and some intermixing of sand and anthracite has occurred. Consequently, replacement of the sand layer for all 12 filters is also proposed. It is anticipated that the GAC media will be biologically active and chlorine feed prior to filtration can adversely affect the GAC. Therefore, the intermediate chlorine feed point is proposed to be moved to the weir chamber immediately downstream of the filters. The existing chlorine piping and diffuser upstream of the filters will remain in place for future use either for disinfection of the filters if necessary or for general disinfection ifMwhen the KWA supply is available and GAC media is no longer needed in terms of TTHM control. Relevant design information is provided in this narrative and detailed calculations follow. 2. DESIGN CRITERIA The Flint WTP began full time operation using the Flint River on April 25", 2014. The following information was taken from monthly operating reports (MOR’s) for the full year from May 2014 through April 2015: A. Average daily demand (ADD) = 18.3 MGD Maximum daily demand (MDD) = 25.4 MGD Minimum monthly average chlorine feed at intermediate point = 1.8 mg/l Average monthly chlorine feed at intermediate point = 2.9 mg/I Average plant effluent pH = 7.8 Maximum monthly average plant effluent pH = 8.1 ™mMOO® Selected WTP design flow = 24 MGD Maximum WTP flow expected = 30 MGD Minimum WTP flow expected = 8 MGD 3. MEDIA DESIGN A. GAC Media ° 18” depth ° GAC media selected is Filtrasorb 400 manufactured by Calgon Carbon Corporation with an effective size of 0.65 mm, uniformity coefficient of 1.90 and specific gravity of 1.40. . The Filtrasorb 400 characteristics vary slightly from Ten State Standards (TSS) which state an effective size of 0.45-0.55 mm and a maximum uniformity coefficient of 1.65. However, it is somewhat unclear if TSS apply xxxEND_PAGE:deq16_b5_0892_4900_0315 to GAC as a capping layer. Also, the Filtrasorb 400 does meet the AWWA standard B604-12 for Granular Activated Carbon. ° When the GAC adsorptive capacity is spent, the media will act strictly as a filtering media. The hope is that the KWA supply will be active by the time GAC adsorption is limited. However, Calgon has agreed to test the GAC capacity quarterly after installation for 1 year to evaluate performance and future need to regenerate or replace the GAC. B. Sand Media ° 12” depth . Sand media shall have effective size of 0.50 mm, uniformity coefficient of 1.65 or less, and specific gravity of 2.5 or greater. Cc. Dual Media Performance . Sand settling velocity greater than GAC settling velocity . D90 of GAC / D10 of sand < 4.0 to avoid excessive intermixing ° Adequate expansion of both medias during backwash without media loss ° Combined head loss of proposed medias less than combined head loss of existing sand and anthracite 4. INTERMEDIATE CHLORINE FEED The new chlorine feed point will be within the first bay of the weir chamber. In order to avoid stripping of chlorine as the water cascades over the weir, a submerged drop pipe will be installed that outlets on the downstream side of the weir wall. Chlorine will be injected into this drop pipe. Contact time will begin in the second bay of the weir chamber. xxxEND_PAGE:deq16_b5_0892_4900_0316 CITY OF FLINT WTP Filter Media Replacement Basis of Design Notes Max. Expected Flow Rate = 30.0 mgd = 20,833 gpm = 2,785 cft/min Max. Day May 2014 - April 2015 = 25.4 mgd = 17,639 gpm = 2,358 cft/min Avg. Day May 2014 - April 2015 = 18.3 mgd = 12,708 gpm = 1,699 eft/min Design Flow Rate = 24.0 mgd = 16,667 gpm = 2,228 cft/min Min. Expected Flow Rate = 8.0 mgd = 5,556 gpm = 743 cft/min Area / Filter = 700 sft Number of Filters = 12 mgd 30.0 24.0 Loading (gpm/sit) = 2.48 Top of Underdrain elev = 723,58 Washwater Trough Weir elev = 730.67 Operating Water Level = 734.00 Top of Filter Basin / Floor elev = 736.00 Filter BW Dimensional D = 7.08 Existing Sand D = 12.00 inches = 1.00 ft Existing Anthracite D = 18.00 inches = 1.50 ft Proposed Sand D = 12.00 inches = 1.00 ft Proposed GAC D = 18.00 inches = 1.50 ft See following pages for details Proposed Water Depth = 7.92 ft Max Cold BW Flow rate / filter = 7910 gpm = 11.3 gpm/sit To match current BW flow rate Max Warm BW Flow rate / filter = 11900 gpm = 17.0 gpm/sit Use when water temp > 65 degrees Max Sand Expanded D = 14.2 inches = 1.18 ft= 18% Occurs at cold temps Max GAC Expanded D = 45.10 inches = 3.76 ft= 150% Total BW Expanded D = 59.30 inches = 4.94 ft Proposed BW Freeboard = 2.14 ft Proposed # of Filters to Replace 12 GAC Volume = 12,600 cit GAC apparent density = 33.7 Ibs/cft GAC Total Weight = 424,620 Ibs = 212.3 tons mgd 30.0 24.0 8.0 EBCT (min) = 45 | 5.7 | 17.0 Propose to relocate intermediate chlorine feed to inlet side of weir chamber following filtration Intermediate CL2 feed point to remain in place as means to disinfect filters in the future, if needed mgd 30.0 24.0 8.0 Contact time (min) = 3 43.7 CT= 59: 78.7 236.1 Calculations attached separately Required CT at 1.8 mg/I chlorine, less than 0.5 degrees C, and pH of 8.0 = 56 OX xxxEND_PAGE:deq16_b5_0892_4900_0317 CITY OF FLINT- DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC UTILITIES Date: 06/03/15 GAC Filter Evaluation : _JRH Filter Media Analysis 2015 ist Stage Backwash Rate (gpm/s' Waiter Temperature {F°} Viscasity (centipoise) Filtrasorb 400 Filtrasorb 300 300/400 Mix New sand / 300 Bed Depth (in} Uniformity Coefficient Effective Size {mm d60% Size (mm 90% Size (mm) Porosii Specific Gravity Media Density icf : ‘ ! 3 156 Min. Fluidization Rate (gpm/sf Reynolds Number 2 : ‘ 3.988 Correction Factor ‘ dl i ‘ 1.000 1.800 Min. Fiuicization Rate (gpmi/sf) I. . : J 9.49 V.2t E Unhindered Settling Vel. {ft/sec ig ‘ “ : 33.53 43.95 ! Expansion Coefficient {n ; z : - 3.132 3.048 3.401 A) Bed Porosity Coefficient {k 3 : ; : 167.27 37.07 425.75 ie) Porosity (expanded - z 4 . i Bed Depth Expanded (in : . % Expanded Bed k J q 4. d90gacid10s Ratio Discussion/Nofes Lockwood, Andrews & Newnam, inc. A LEQ A BALY COMPANY xxxEND_PAGE:deq16_b5_0892_4900_0318 CITY OF FLINT- DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC UTILITIES Date: 06/03/15 GAC Filter Evaluation By: _JRH Filter Media Analysis 2015 1st Stage Data Entry: Backwash Rate (gpm/sf Water Temperature (F° | 80 | Viscosity (centipoise’ 0.86134 Dynamic Viscosity (# -sec/sf) 1.799E-05 Water Density (#/cf 62.22 Mass Density (# -sec/ft*) 1.927 R \ Filtrasorb 400 Filtrasorb 300 300/400 Mix New sand / 300 : SS G | | is | 12 | ie | 2 : 490% Size (mm |_ 1.000 | 0840 | 0779 | 1.000 _| 2 Min. Fluidization Rate (gpmv/st) Expansion Coefficient ( ; H 2.926 2.731 2.656 2.965 2.995 n Unhindered Settling Vel. (ft/sec : . ; | 66.16 | 132.10 | 174.11 57.95 52.44 Bed Porosity Coefficient (k E : : 44.59 185.36 44.89 160.68 31.81 y Discussion/Notes Use 20 goriv/sf SW Use 16.99 xxxEND_PAGE:deq16_b5_0892_4900_0319 CITY OF FLINT WTP CT CALCS TIME FROM FILTERS EFFLUENT TO 1ST TAP amet Weir chamber, pre-baffle E B_ |Weir chamber, post-baffle 26.75| 8.5 12.4 3.06 Effluent pipe Cc we - bldg face 48 4.00 16.00) 201 30.0 46.4 1.0 0.07 3.69) 24.0] 37.1 0.09) 8.0/ 124 0.27: D bldg face - junct well 48 4.00| 401.00 5039] 30.0 46.4 1.0 1.81 3.69} 24.0) 37.1 2.26) 8.0] 12.4 6.793 Res. 3 E dunct well 12.00) 704.00 3240] 30.0 46.4 0.50 0.58 0.34] 24.0| 37.1 0.73) 8.0) 12.4 2.18: F Clear well 140.00 709.00} 247,800] 30.0 46.4 0.30 26.69 0.09) 24.0] 37.1 33.37] 8.0) 12.4) 100.10: G Transfer chamber 7.00| 55.25 15.0| 704.00 5,801 30.0 46.4 0.50 1.04 0.11 24.0} 37.1 1.30) 8.0} 12.4 3.91 H Suction well 9.00] 25.75 15.0] 704.00 3,476] 30.0 46.4 0.50 0.62 0.24) 24.0) 37.1 0.78} 8.0] 12.4 2.34; Pump | Suction pipe 36 3.00 12.00) 85} 30.0 46.4 1.0 0.03 6.57) 24.0) 37.1 0.04} 8.0} 12.4 0.141 Discharge pipe 30 2.50 20.00 93] 30.0 46.4 1.0 0.04 9.46) 24.0) 37.1 0.04} 8.0] 12.4 0.13} K Dis. pipe (to bldg face) 42 3.50 34.00 327] 30.0 46.4 1.0 0.12 4.82) 24.0} 37.1 0.15) 8.0} 12.4 0.44: Finish main 2 L2 bldg face - 1st tee 42 3.50 73.00 702] M2 tee - 1st split 42 3.50| 277.00 2665) Subtotal Total CT time]@ 30 mgd = 33.0 @ 24 mgd = 43.7[@ 12 mgd = 131.23 ee ar 2014 2015 Month May dune dul Au Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr Min Av Max Cl2 5.0 47 3.9 3.3 3.1 25 2.0 1.8 1.8 2.1 2.4 2.0 18 29 5.0 IH 7.37 7.48 7.62 7.78 | 7.82 771 7.87 8.07 7.74 7.84 7.89 7.83 7.4 78 8.1 Flow (mgd 30.0) 24.0 8.0) CT = 59.5] 78.7) 236.1 xxxEND_PAGE:deq16_b5_0892_4900_0320 fenuey eouepind Wd3 Buppewyoueg pue Buljyoig uoajuIsSIG 0) 666 Isnony Table C-1. CT Values for Inactivation of Giardia Cysts by Free Chlorine at 0.5°C or Lower CHLORINE (mg/L) CHLORINE CONCENTRATION (mg/L) Source: AWWA, 1991. CONCENTRATION pH<=6 Log Inactivation 75 20 25 30 69 91 114 137 71 94 118 141 73 97 121 145) 123 148 127 162 129 155 79 105 131 157 135 162 138 165 85 113 141 169 143 172 146 175 148 178 91 121 151 181 pH=8.0 15 20 25 3.0 139 185 231 277 143 191 238 286) 148 197 246 295 152 203 253 304 157 209 261 313 161 214 268 321 165 219 274 329 169 225 282 338 173 231 288 346 177 235 294 353 181 241 301 361 184 245 307 368 188 250 313 375 191 255 318 382 pH=6.5 Log Inactivation TS 20 25 3.0 82 109 136 163 84 112 140 169 86 115 143 172 88 117 147 176 90 120 150 180 92 123 153 184 95 126 155 189 97 129 161 193 99 131 164 197 134 169 201 137 171 205 139 174 209 142 178 213 145 181 217 pH=8.5 Log Inactivation 1.0 110 114 113 122 125 129 132 136 139 142 145 148 151 153 15 20 25 3.0 165 219 274 329 171 228 285 342 177 236 295 354 183 243 304 365 188 251 313 376 194 258 323 387 199 265 331 397 204 271 339 407 209 278 348 417 213 284 355 426 218 290 363 435 222 296 370 444 226 301 377 452 230 307 383 460 pH=7.0 Log Inactivation 10 15 20 25 65 98 130 163 67 100 133 167 68 103 137 171 70 105 140 175 72 108 143 179 74 111 147 184 75 113 151 188 77 116 154 193 79 118 157 197 81 121 161 202 82 124 165 206 84 126 168 210 86 129 171 214 87 131 174 218 pH=9.0 Log Inactivation 10 15 20 25 130 195 260 325 136 204 271 339 141 211 281 352 146 219 291 364 150 226 301 376 155 232 309 387 159 239 318 398 163 245 326 408 167 250 333 417 170 256 341 426 174 261 348 435 178 267 355 444 181 272 362 453 184 276 369 460 0.5 pH=7.5 Log Inactivation 1.0 15 20 25 79 119 158 198 80 120 159 199 82 123 164 205 84 127 169 211 86 130 173 216 89 133 177 222 91 137 182 228 93 140 186 233 95 143 191 238 99 149 198 248 99 149 199 248 101 152 203 253 155 207 258 158 211 263 3.0 237 239 246 253 259 266 273 279 286 297 298 304 310 316 SLNVLOZINISIG SNOLUVA AP GFAZIHOY SNOILVALLOVN HOS SSNTIVA LO “OC XIGNAddy xxxEND_PAGE:deq16_b5_0892_4900_0321 xxxEND_PAGE:deq16_b5_0892_4900_0322 CITY OF FLINT- DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC UTILITIES GAC Filter Evaluation Filter Media Analysis 2015 Ist Stage SSSA. >i EQ CCC FR. E A AaAaAiAaA Awww wCE_ }>FwRROw EDGE Tm. wc ul s 32 9/27/2015 field measurements Flow Rate (gprri/st) 3.00 40 time: 2:30 Velocity (ips) 0.008684 50 Filter #7 Water Temperature (F*) 32. 60 water depth in service 98 inches = 8.17 ft Kinematic Viscosity (t’/s) 4.931E-05 70 Flow as per panel 1160 gpm Dynamic Viscosity (# -seo/st) |_3.746E-05 80 8 filters in service Water Density (#/ct} 62.42 90 MOR plant flow Mass Density (# -seo/tt’) 1.940 Ig titvsec*) = 32.2 Existir in Proposed Sand w/ 4( Shape factor 0.82 Shape factor 0.82 Porosity = 04 Porosity = 0.4 Depth = 12 in= 1.0 ft Depth = 12ine 1.0 ft Mesh d f R cd (Cay(fyd Mesh d f R Cd (Ca)ifd # mm in ft % passing % retained Cumulative # mm in ft % passing % retainedCumulative 8 2 0.07874 0.00656 1 9 0 1.862 15.4 0.0 ~16 1.154 0.0454 0.00379 09 01 Of 1.075 256 675 16 1.18 0.04646 0.00887 0.9925 0.0075 0.0075 1.099 25.0 48.5 ~20 0.825 0.0325 0.00271 06 0.4 05 0.768 35.0 5,173 30 06 0.02362 0.00197 0.3076 0.6849 0.6924 0.559 473 16,460 35 05 0.0197 0.00164 0.1 0.4 09 0.466 56.3 13,724 50 03 0.01181 0.00098 0.0256 0.282 0.9744 0.279 91.9 26,337 50 03 0.0118 0.00098 0.05 0.05 0.95 0.279 91.9 4,670 100 015 0.00591 0.00049 0.0087 (0.0169. 0.9913 0.140 180.2 6,188 100 O15 0.0059 0.00049 0.005 0.045 0.995 0.140 180.2 16,476 200 0.075 0.00295 0.00025 0.005 0.0037 0.995 0.070 355.3 5,343 200 0.075 0.0030 0.00025 0.005 0 0.995 0.070 355.3 0 0.0312 0.00123 0.00010 i) 0.005 1 0.029 844.0 lost by wash 0.0312 0.0012 0.00010 0 0.005 1 0.029 844.0 lost by wash 54,376 40,718 Head loss = 3.83 ft Head loss = 2.87 ft Anthracite GAC - Filtrsorb 400 Shape factor O7 Shape factor 0.8 Porosity = 0.45 Porosity = 0.614 Depth = 18 in= 15 ft Depth = 18 in= 15 ft Mesh d ft R Cd (Ca) (fd Mesh d f R Cd (Ca)(fy/a # mm in ft % passing % retained Cumulative # mm in ft % passing % retainedCumulative 8 2.38 0.09370 0.00781 0.95 0.05 2.162 13.5 86.3 8 2.38 0.0937 0.00781 0.01 2.162 13.5 17.3 18 1 0.03937 0.00328 On 0.9 0.950 0.909 299 8,203 12 1.68 0.0661 0.00551 0.05 1.526 18.5 134.2 30 06 0.02362 0.00197 0.04 0.01 0.960 0.545 48.4 246 30 06 0.0236 0.00197 09 0.545 48.4 20,913 40 04 0.01575 0.00131 0.01 0.03 0.990 0.363 714 1,631 40 04 0.0157 0.00131 : 0.96 0.363 714 3,263 100 0.15 0.00591 0.00049 0.0075 0.0025 0.993 0.136 184.6 938 100 0.15 0.0059 0.00049 0.01 0.03 0.99 0.136 1846 = 11,252 200 0.075 0.00295 0.00025 0.005 0.0025 0.995, 0.068 364.1 3,699 200 0.075 0.0030 0.00025 0.005 0.005 0.995, 0.068 364.1 7,398 0.0312 0.00123 0.00010 0 0.005 1 0.028 864.9 0.0312 0.0012 0.00010 0 0.005 1 0.028 864.9 14,803 42,976 Head loss = 1.15 ft= 13.7 in Head loss = 0.84 ft= 10.1 in Ex. mixed media HL = 4.98 ft Pr. mixed media HL = 3.71 ft xxxEND_PAGE:deq16_b5_0892_4900_0323 (10% FTO8 | FT15 FTO9 FTI0 MAINTAIN 3” PIPING FROM FILTER CLASSIFICATION AREA TO 36” WASH WATER DRAIN CONCRETE ENCASEME! (TYPICAL OF 2) FTO8 | FT16 LADDER TO WEST WASH WATER. | SUPPLY PLATFORM DEHUMIDIFIER ON DEHUMIDIFIER ( STAND. SEE DETAIL SHEET FT23. FILTER GALLERY PIPING LEGEND io | DESCRIPTION EXISTING | NeW WASH WATER SUPPLY — GALLERY YES SERVING FILTERS NO. 5 — NO. 12, INCLUSIVE rm Pe EFFLUENT FILTERS NO. 5 — NO. 12, INCLUSIVE FILTERS NO. 5 — NO. 12, INCLUSIVE YES SOUTH EFFLUENT | es WASH WATER DRAIN FILTERS NO. 5 — NO. 12, INCLUSIVE INFLUENT FILTERS NO. 5 — NO. 12, INCLUSIVE SURFACE WASH YES FILTERS NO. 5 — NO. 12, INCLUSIVE PLANT WATER AND SURFACE WASH WASH AIR SUPPLY — GALLERY WASH AIR SUPPLY FILTERS NO. 5 — NO. 12, INCLUSIVE FILTER TO WASTE CE sama mouse] § | PROCESS WATER B EE | WASH WATER SUPPLY — WEST #l*)sl}]=[=]s/s|s)e]s] ENGINEERS - ARCHITECTS - SCIENTISTS - PLANNERS - SURVEYORS 1425 KEYSTONE AVE., LANSING, MI 48911 TELE. (517) 393-6800 + FAX (517) 272-7390 @ 30” WASH WATER DRAIN co rj -—@————— - = 24” NORTH EFFLUENT==>—(S)—-@ : Cy LJ 30” WASH WATER DRAIN FTO8 | ET15 FTO8 | F114 FTO8 | E114 FTO9 FTO9 FTI0 FT10 ‘ FILTER [NO. 12 FILTER NO. 10 | FILTER| NO. 7-0" €@ 30° WASH WATER DRAIN @ 30” WASH WATER DRAIN Eel 30” MANWAY FL ¢ 30” MANWAY @ 36” WASH WATER DRAIN = = _™ rH - £24" SOUTH EFFLUENT =mm>— (T)-Y : CI “Me = 30” MANWAY 30” MANWAY ¢@ 30” WASH WATER DRAIN g 30” WASH WATER_DRAIN A | lo} (TYP.) FILTER | NO. FILTER NO. 9 i 1 aL NO. ‘ ‘ FLANGE CONNECTION @ FILTER BOX WALL h L ANY DAMAGED OR SPALLING CONCRETE SHALL BE REMOVED. ANY EXPOSED INTEGRALLY CAST HARDWARE AT FLANGE AT FILTER BOX WALL SHALL BE CLEANED BY SSPC—SP—6 COMMERCIAL BLAST, EPOXY COATED WITH TNEMEC SERIES 66, AND PATCHED WITH DURATHIN SINGLE COMPONENT POLYMER—REINFORCED HIGH STRENGTH CEMENT BASED PATCHING MATERIAL OR ENGINEER— APPROVED EQUAL. ORIGINAL PLANAR WALL SURFACE SHALL BE RESTORED. FILTER NO. 6 EXISTING CAST IRON WASH WATER DRAIN DISTANCE FROM FILTER BOX WALL TO FLANGE/ FLANGE FACE DISTANCE "D ¢ 167/24” RISER SEE WASH WATER DRAIN DISSIMILAR MATERIAL ONNECTION DETA SHEET FT14. FILTERS NO. 7, 9, & 11 SIMILAR. FILTERS NO. 5, 8, 10, & 12 OPPOSITE HAND. 30” WASH WATER DRAIN DETAIL SCALE: 1/4° = 1'-0" MICHIGAN CITY OF FLINT DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS & UTILITIES | a RELOCATED SUMP PUMA - PIPING = Shei FT08 | FT14 8 <== 36” DRAIN SEE 30” WASH WATER DRAIN ’ DIA. SAN. DETAIL. EWER M.H. ee ¢ 30° MANWAY FT ¢ 30” MANWAY | RELOCATED |SUMP_ PUMP IPING _ _b3 | + —— TH ere} —>— 30” MANWAY ¢ 30” MANWAY || <==12" SAN. SEWER 7 | @ OF WATER PLANT FILTER PLAN — EL. 720'-0" SCALE : 1/8” = 1’-0” GENERAL NOTE ALL DRAWINGS ARE A REPRESENTATION OF ACTUAL CONDITIONS BASED ON 1952 CONSTRUCTION PLAN DRAWINGS. CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS, SIZES, AND LOCATIONS OF ALL RELEVANT ITEMS. GENERAL NOTE NO. 1 A THIS NOTE APPLIES TO DRAWINGS FT01 THROUGH FT28 THE WORK ARE FOR ALL CONCRETE SURFACES THAT ARE REPAIRED, INFILLED OR PATCHED SHALL BE SMOOTH AND FLUSH WITH SURROUNDING CONCRETE SURFACES. IF NECESSARY THE CONTRACTOR SHALL GRIND THE NEW SURFACES TO BE FLUSH WITH THE ADJOINING SURFACES. WATER TREATMENT PLANT REHABILITATION PHASE |, SEGMENT 4 FILTER REHABILITATION NEW FILTER PLAN — EL. 720°-0” FILTER NO. 6 FILTER NO. 5 FILTER NO. 4 CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLETE ALL EFFLUENT PIPING TO WEST OF SPOOL PIECE AND SUCCESSFULLY PRESSURE TEST IN PRESENCE OF ENGINEER PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF THIS NORTH EFFLUENT SPOOL PIECE. FILTER NO. 2 7-0" 30” WASH WATER DRAIN € 30” WASH WATER DRAIN © 30” WASH WATER DRAIN ¢ E| G 30” MANWAY LE |_¢ 30” MANWAY ¢ 30” MANWAY_[E. ¢ 30” MANWAY CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLETE ALL EFFLUENT PIPING TO WEST OF SPOOL PIECE AND SUCCESSFULLY PRESSURE TEST IN PRESENCE OF ENGINEER PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF THIS SOUTH EFFLUENT SPOOL PIECE. ¢ 30” WASH WATER DRAIN 30” WASH WATER DRAIN a | lo} (TYP.) FILTER NO. 3 FILTER NO. 1 PIPE END CONFIGURATION LEGEND | FLANGE I GROOVED END COUPLING H SLEEVE TYPE COUPLING RELOCATED SUMP PUMP RELOCATE PUMP DISCHARGE TO TIE INTO EXISTING DISCHARGE PIPING. FILTER WALL : T/ FLOOR EL. 720'-9"~ | RELOCATED 4| | SUMP PUMP | PIPING } T/FLOOR EL. 713'-6" GENERAL CONSTRUCTION NOTE NO MOUNTING OR FASTENING OF ANY TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT EQUIPMENT, SUPPORTS, OR DEVICES SECTION SCALE : 1/4” = 1-0” FTO8|FTO8& TO THE CONCRETE OF THE FILTER BOXES OR INFLUENT CHANNEL IS PERMITTED. REVISION fcHK'D. = CAP. C.A.P. ADDENDUM NO. 1 REVISION | 10/03) APPRV’D C.A.P. DATE JUNE 2002 PROJECT NUMBER P>D>PDDP Ia G 30” WASH WATER DRAIN WASH WATER VALVE. INDICATION PANEL (03) 20” X 16” REDUCER FLOOR ELEV. 709’—0” ~~ FT08 | FTI3 FTO9 FT10 eel RELOCATED 6” ROOF DRAIN <== 36” WASH WATER DRAIN GDP eel penenenrnnanarnnmnnnnn Hf 2 <= 48” EFFLUENT 48” EFFLUENT TO RESERVOIR NO. 4 k->_ 36” WASH WATER DRAIN TO STORM SEWER (FUTURE RESIDUALS HANDLING) NOTES : 1, FILTER INTERNALS NOT SHOWN FOR CLARITY. 2. SUPPORT MECHANISMS FOR VALVES, ACTUATORS, & PIPING NOT SHOWN FOR CLARITY. REFER TO 1/4 SCALE SECTIONS FOR SUPPORT LOCATIONS. . HANDRAIL NOT SHOWN FOR CLARITY. SEE NEW FILTER GALLERY SECTION FOR NEW HANDRAIL AT FLOOR ELEV. 718'~ AT TOP OF 36” WASH WATER DRAIN CONCRETE ENCASEMENT. Ww \ WASHWATER TRANSFER] . ) SHEET OF DRAWING NUMBER FTO8 xxxEND_PAGE:deq16_b5_0892_4900_0324 FILTER NO. 7 FILTER NO. 9 FILTER NO. 11 LA ha -————_———__ FIGURE 52 PLATE FOR 1 1/4” DIA. ROD ae CS N aes i. a FOR 1 1/4” DIA. ROD N ” WITH (4) 5/8” DIA. EXPANSION BOLTS AND 4” AIR RELEASE/VACUUM VALVE WITH (4) 5/8” DIA. EXPANSION BOLTS AND 4” AIR RELEASE/VACUUM VALVE FILTER FILTER HOSE® FILTER ‘ALVI N WITH DRAIN PIPING TO EL. 718-6” CONSOLE GRINNELL STEEL ADJUSTABLE CLEVIS HANGER, CONSOLE BIB io 2” PROCESS WATER CONSOLE WITH DRAIN PIPING TO EL. 718-6 N GRINNELL STEEL ADJUSTABLE CLEVIS HANGER, SEE PIPE RESTRAINT DETAIL 1 FIGURE 260. TYPICAL 20” WASH WATER LINE. SHEET FT23. 2” PROCESS N WATER N ram pa i ¢ 10"] SOUTH WASH | AIR 733 i—-| aap oF iu Eva GE 2” BALL VALVE / 1 1/2" FIREHOSE | GRINNELL CONCRETE ROD ATTACHMENT {CONNECTION GRINNELL CONCRETE ROD ATTACHMENT N FIGURE 260. TYPICAL 24” WASH WATER LINE. (6” ABOVE CENTER WALKWAY) WITH LINK SEAL Wl YY (6” ABOVE CENTER WALKWAY) HANDRAIL NOT SHOWN 2” PROCESS WATER 2” PROCESS WATER € ss 2” PROCESS WATER TO FIREHOSE CONNECTION AT FILTER NO. 10 " Oe ii : Lomo {fe-o] so" 20" zlo_ I l a a ae a | \ u u | {}—————__{}_ —_____]]} SSssper7 ff J] fp ff] fi ssp tp} ——_ BSsyy*7#_ 1! [_—__- 4 NOTE : SANITARY SEWER TO oe ® ~~ 1g" ; ‘ ji i i sue BE RELOCATED IN SEGMENT 3 —— — (TYP. OF 2 LOCATIONS) 2-0" PIPE WITH TYPE 1 GRINNEL WEST WASH WATER SUPPLY PIPE SADDLE SUPPORT PLATFORM EL. 725°—0" AT WASH AIR VALVE @2 . REMOVE PIPE HANGERS AT VALVE @02) AS NECESSARY PE Sn PROVIDE 3” DIA. SCH. 40 24” BLIND FLANGE WITH 4” FLANGE, RELOCATED VALVE G4 AND DRAIN LINE V1 HANDRAIL NOT SHOWN MA T C H PIPE SADDLE EAST-WEST 5. ni ! CENTERLINE SHALL MATCH 2-0 MAINTAIN 3° PIPING FROM FILTER CLASSIFICATION AREA TO 36” WASH Zod WATER DRAIN CONCRETE. ENCASEMEN THAT OF ADJACENT COLUMN C-S9. = 4 === a iC ast ; © 5 ei ~ 5 sig! < —6"~ 5 < —6"~ 5 < = 5 Yn =< Yn SADDLE (TYP. = Yn = z = Ele 2/5 EE =| = = SEE DETAL. bile 2/5 EE =| = = ti 25 E =| GENERAL NOTE NO. 1 % ale s |o ® s |< 2 ale =e |e 2 2 l< a ate s |e . es l< ¢ OF WATER PLANT id . lie BIg = le 8 5 al BIE = “lp _ - i RIE 2 ele THIS NOTE APPLIES TO DRAWINGS FTO1 r a a THROUGH FT28 PIPE SADDLE EAST-WEST PIPE SADDLE EAST-WEST THE WORK ARE FOR ALL CONCRETE SURFACES THAT PIPE END CONFIGURATION LEGEND PIPE STAND LEGEND oe hae SECTION - WEST ee ARE REPAIRED, INFILLED OR PATCHED SHALL BE SMOOTH COLUMN C-S7. SCALE : 1/4" = 1’-O" FTO8/FT13 COLUMN C-S5. AND FLUSH WITH SURROUNDING CONCRETE SURFACES. IF NECESSARY THE CONTRACTOR SHALL GRIND THE NEW TYPE 1 GRINNEL ADJUSTABLE PIPE SADDLE SUPPORT FIG. 264 FTO9 SURFACES TO BE FLUSH WITH THE ADJOINING SURFACES. FT10 | GROOVED END COUPLING TYPE 2 — GRINNEL ADJUSTABLE PIPE SUPPORT FIGURE 264 MODIFIED TO SUPPORT VALVE FILTER NO. 1 FILTER NO. 3 FILTER NO. H SLEEVE TYPE COUPLING TYPE 3° GRINNEL ADJUSTABLE PIPE STANCHION FIG. 62 GRINNELL CONCRETE ROD ATTACHMENT FIGURE 52 PLATE FOR 1 1/4” DIA. ROD es WITH (4) 5/8” DIA. EXPANSION BOLTS AND GRINNELL STEEL ADJUSTABLE CLEVIS HANGER, FILTER FIGURE 260. TYPICAL 24” WASH WATER LINE. CONSOLE ch J o 7 _ ae. ] I | 7 —= I I _- FE 10" SOUTH WASH AIR 733'-8"<=> = — @ 10" SOUTH WASH AIR 733-8" <=> —H IW OES PROPOSED (P) (A @ _S- PIPE HANGER, TYPICAL 2” POTABLE WATER 3/4” PROCESS WATER TO H.B. AT C—S14 lu SPX2" & 3” HOT WATER 2” POTABLE WATER 3] . @ a ee Cy 2” POTABLE WATER 6” PROCESS WATER = CO 6” PROCESS WATER OD) 6" PROCESS WATER CT 4° O.D. INSULATED CONDENSATE RETURN —, 6” 4” 0.D. INSU CONDENSATE RETURN = 9*_§” 3'-6" 10'-6" — @ 9" 0.D. INSULATED CONDENSATE RETURN 4" O.D. INSULATED CONDENSATE RETURN 6” BLIND FLANGE WITH 3” THREADED TAP FOR GONDENSATE| 3” COPPER WATER LINE RETURN PUMP aig MATCH 36” X 30” K ECCENTRIC § REDUCER XK CONCRETE SADDLE (TYP.) SEE DETAIL. a ce ee PIPE SADDLE EAST-WEST z. = > z. = Po a CONCRETE PIPE . CENTERLINE SHALL MATCH Po z 3 x =. z 3 x 5, we a z PIER, TYP. SEE 3) THAT OF ADJACENT COLUMN, = als B Zz Gl= a Zz 5 = §|Z ETAL DWG F123. =] C-st6. B z 3/5 af = = 3/5 al = = Ze i |S al = = ¢ OF WATER PLANT le lz ® 8 |B lz ® e |= ‘e le Rlz ® 8 oS ols o! ol oS ols o! oI ele ol ol Z ols oI o GENERAL CONSTRUCTION NOTE GENERAL NOTE CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLETE ALL SECTI ON EAST EFFLUENT PIPING TO WEST OF SPOOL PIECE AND SUCCESSFULLY PRESSURE Foe NO MOUNTING OR FASTENING OF ANY TEMPORARY ALL DRAWINGS ARE A REPRESENTATION OF ACTUAL SCALE : 1/4" = 1-0 / FTO8/FT13 aN nie Ge LS OR PERMANENT EQUIPMENT, SUPPORTS, OR DEVICES CONDITIONS BASED ON 1952 CONSTRUCTION PLAN FTO9 SOUTH EFFLUENT SPOOL PIECE. TO THE CONCRETE OF THE FILTER BOXES OR INFLUENT DRAWINGS. CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY ALL FT10 CHANNEL IS PERMITTED. DIMENSIONS, SIZES, AND LOCATIONS OF ALL RELEVANT ITEMS. MICHIGAN REVISION SHEET WATER TREATMENT PLANT REHABILITATION PHASE I, SEGMENT 4 oF CITY OF FLINT eee eee ct eae tes DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS & UTILITIES 1425 KEYSTONE AVE., LANSING, MI 48911 TELE. (517) 393-6800 + FAX (517) 272-7390 DATE JUNE 2002 PROJECT NUMBER DRAWING NUMBER F113 FILTER REHABILITATION NEW FILTER GALLERY SECTIONS ~ ile fT {| | lelsle| alo|o SS i aleym a xxxEND_PAGE:deq16_b5_0892_4900_0325 1 tt u wee j— —— — —_ — -_---—— ---_—- -Gi- -_---—— -_---—— -_---—— -_---—— [(— — ——s --—— —s — os —l Yu | pe a oP PSP OP iu GPP OS | 4P wll | 7% “ey ® | ° it Le | | af a iT OZON 3LDG ta y IS / SS yf ! SI | 4a th WH PLANT NO. 1 i aie alll a (ABANDONED) | Tl | " # \| 5 - 727.21, x | 3 Wy — Ye = —_ CHLORINE CONTACT - 4ST . q 16 | i [| : 4 1a / _ if f | 5 8 Wy ZZ SDE Ls SRR aR NK N = ~ _ N = = Tae, ac ‘ a i a || ee cc dlc (lr hid ~~ | | | | ~N 1 | tt J ~ 1d My ! ss. | | a $ | \ ~ Ri ~~ | 3 | Ho PIN : oO we L a S an = I> s / boi 2" Wake cg, 8 ; I Sa Curr Nn Fe 1 | eg ae ro ST \ | - St poté \ \ 1 yd 7 ee / NS ) I | 4 ff yr lot “|e / na cael | _— _— cs / Fi NY Id ~Ly 7 OQ, 7x (oi SO. —_ a f/f St! ~J LOL 7s | f# SATS 48" RAW WATER LOW SERVICE 7 // SASS Li DDT TT TTT IIIT TIT IIIIL Le SOA HVT / Li SD 8 PAW WATER LOW SERVICE __ f/f SQYA 720.31 . wet / Ze Ofor or = : BY Sf . N / Tig NY . SS \W 6) / R ee Sv / G \ \ MH #8 \ / RIM = 725.08 _ 24” OD CT_WATER. xxxEND_PAGE:deq16_b5_0892_4900_0326 EZ CONTAS, INLET CHAMBER . Ola RE £6 7 oN wy OF = cy ae “<! (STs G ~ Tee! a, Vo ly : We 3 tof eK if 2 fe shaded: NORRIS: & MAY’ G JENGINEERS | xxxEND_PAGE:deq16_b5_0892_4900_0327 MICHIGAN. “GITY OF FLINT 28.5 r Chlorine Stero ge. iver) Alan ea Nua ree s re Seterde. Jo) Lite fon rvorking Line &% a gq Stat 7 un win é sf e Storage ern rheadg 4 Ove bb WS EL 725.5. ra~4E” Row f INES wee qe gee cee tor Room We : Chlor wo 4 v SEW working Line. gh Lift AY 7 As ra ff Pump : Room. i L Gus SSseaes 4 wy Z, rate Ee Fah ry Ens Tas nh, 9 Sui: tech Gear R fe + borking | Line ena /St aE fee/ Bear. Supports. ” Rad sce “ “8 é 9 working Lin MES. ae 4 ‘ Re ‘Servo olumirs extend \ 12 Solid earth, By er eae? co High Service. Pipe ure Piping | . 4 Opace for ° Fut ’ Working Lin “NN ~ & z rs ee ny Pa YN SS v as B40F° gompre us Chiorine Of, “Onder anoth® Cenly 3 eae i FECTION Ce 3 J 7% ufure H. EL FOnGO At Ft igh Lift Pumps | i Eh, Vite lei sts neowsly aie ccd cone rele cf 2 xxxEND_PAGE:deq16_b5_0892_4900_0328 26 rae 7S sacl Yieg, I 42" Sfee/ Line . PUMP SYSTIon . ¢ : Og NA ; : ae 7 iP , r 48. Beiimoetty 42°RAB Red Elbow te i : ‘ a RCN Sh ey ‘ ; | 5 ge Sy bt GEE Bevtiouthy BS Me cok _ oo ! a Sb as ‘ MS a's < wad! 2Ballmovth FR, 36" BellAaeoth “% ii : _ 30"% 36” - ge'%a2" Qed Elbow +N a \ * J0"" 86"Rechucing Elbow 30% 36" ‘sheer Pealicar. 30% 42 ” Stee/ Reducer ‘a ‘Skee/ Redus er ; : i a "Re 4 bo : qa gq. i if LE), 709.50 ¢ EL 109,50 €E/ 709.50 x#2 Ree, £/ awl eed: | 20° SP wall L. lead. Joints Leay Jf & EL JOR 28 42" Steal Lead Sant. - ole . ars . 30" 84 hOl/ Slee St Wall 3; ait kat ° 7 “e [30 Steel Seve. | Bo" AD. £ & 70% 50 aa 4 he Veeve 80", rl weere fead iat a fat Seve» é Ef yoalesd ial! S/eeve |- GO 24" Ecce, Reducer|. 1 36%30" Eee. Real lop, 12 ee 30" Valve: ‘i UM PS t gous" Reducer ; “dad 30%20" Res 4 Se FI 2-48 RC.Lines | \ to Chloriagé : ontrack ° TRANSFER, : xxxEND_PAGE:deq16_b5_0892_4900_0329 Operating Mesh # of Cone Volve Operatiig Mesh one Vaive | 30°88" Rex f SA worl Pree | i - bo Wall place fe e ss J (EL 74 594) \ I pt Voint Pipey fe : all £ of Cone Valve i 15 MGD oa ; a. MigH LIFT & of Cone alve — We a Low Lier nee Po) Pump Sucrion Sperading Mech, » a ae FUP SUETIon < z . +. UETION (30" 36 Reducing Eibor. | - "| 36%42" Red. ethene, SSN: ANS RES | £El 71000 a) -. L€A 70883 Kae Hage ee ia fp: ae BO. q ‘ peo . “s 4 ! “be ‘ ma - . ~~ . f . ; a ee O ee | ¢ ye 80 bce, Log! L apoa) | «| L_£h 127009 | yn | i 30°20" Bec, Bed-— > ) ami Fe : f ant _ 3018" Ler af ae _ | ¢ 56° St Wall Sleeve. oy x" * ; Le, | i 5-944 Dowels NS AG Gowels El. 704.009 . arobeate exe ot fee gta ae ea Recssel eas 8 te oN ee sanieanmennci a sg te cic seman ss pendben pbeee font os een nee emt — 1s i a Rey & % 5 t ; ¢ o ; o a oy dows! fs. cone nent coe ae eta enn _ Wess . ‘ 42° R.2, fppe. Poor Seercgn. ALA, (s 15, } Secrion E-€ wall with pipe | POU AGE oe ee Pd? mr an re Sfee/ Tange. 4 (SHowi WG - LEE 7D Pune) ee Malolos vei GE as Soules fits" ; _ , 8 | eo HILgH SE “£ of Comes Vi att “war in7 IEEE Pipe GAlLcerr / MB” Sh Kein. “w 42: 42028 Tee. _ 2 qQ A. 42°36 Etc. Reducer?” : ‘ Bednocth ‘ rer Tit “96 '*50" Eee. ben ~ ) 30'*29% Fear, Lea’ 7? | { | i} i} | \ 42:30" Reducer ; aot ey ies lye z “te : ; 6 aad Heere. he ide : i ae ¥ 5 AEE CL 4 . ‘ O- 74" P Dewels -- iz eS os 704. caer __ 8 : een serene | a ve Shoal Lf: faye Cor we led pon pf ali pes * VPHOA ING oM “MGD # utp oie (VHGA EAE G whip) eh 717, 253 \ Sew es 4 M8 oft Moar . ¥ él. . “£ of Cone Valve ~ . . . ; Seale: Sito” \ fg Operating Mech, Low Lier | _. : . Bi" Db Kian , ; Putrae SUCTION | Nr . ye Weil E/b ; gil" meee Core Z . . OW me bo ” POLE j i eee Ae eR RR ER minh AA pe Ree . “4 | Flare an Z Cell. “s fra" y a \ ZI*P4 | f i > iy : 7 i Requrer uf 36°"30 Eco. Reduce» r L Fe cin SHE ES rt a ‘I {| AR! 3 reg rt,“ wah re G0. Flare I S 36" if a a | he ao " St Wall Sleeve Q iB bolt ¢ inserll ~ | cect F : es MY ve Qecriow C-C 7 +8" (SHowing €0 GD Do Pour) Scafle:¢ qZzlo" (noms 5 i on tae LIS CHARGE ) Saale s ‘Z Ss flo” we of Corres | Valve gp “per aring Mech, yt f Come VOolve i Operating Mec h, 30” S4 Wait Sleeve Low L(ET (36 42" Red. Elbaw a, 36°30" Ecce. a : iy BIB Bed. Sellen uth 7 - a - "8 dowels he, * 36" St Wall svee$ | oy SECTION D-D - a rnin 28 4ED SECTION H- Af ng Pe. (SrHoming 5/4 #2 Pune) (Sowing ZO SIG D Pomp Lise CHAR ga) Series tio , - , / rn cr Seale f tro” “ 1 “OITY OF FLINT, MICHIGAN. | ra , WATER TREATMENT PLANT — PUMPING STATION NOS Wore: AKA Denorves Forture Biogen Lier Funnps ¢ FIrPés. (2. Soction piping for Wee “hier Peng a /S a8 shown 10 “Shee LOE | Manu “Spent ‘Bese Wee are | se L S) NO RIS. & MA Feo, 49iRejocate H Lift J Pumps Vibe. _ pes EWl R HAY : rte JAN. 44 ‘Re locate, Lit} Valves: Wade. fe CONSULTING ENGINEERS ff BEV IZ DEC. a3/" Complete Details : “ated | : ANN, ARBOR,. MICHIGAN ©’ e 4 . ae *s wt Be a, a‘ we i re fap" a ie eee ee eee os REV LL Joel we issue © Bae os ee + xxxEND_PAGE:deq16_b5_0892_4900_0330 ry 13S ogi a Pa aR RE, ae & TATION : de} Filtered Water fype~ <t. _ . : 2 wd ler Lupe $ a Lower tar” siaies te ~? FBiacp gan *"y | Ee pet rales vant. : ‘ : ah. f te i ay in, BE VEGAS 5 : oe. Ly ; | ' wo ; CONTROL: CHAIGGER rE & sie “rth {rare F poveaen? A sen ta bea th To : “a'Reservoir Transfer Line 4 aE Moen 08. LINE We Wc tee mt Ot 7 , i Sf t ee: £ of Reservoir 2K Ie cock ft he ti . ¥ : Bhs ef Pi ee : ; 1 . : E i TOTS a Ae F- “4 ben 810" 0” conan ore val LOD OPEL ect semen a) Oo eae roe Oar ty Sete F we Koos 7? Se Pp Oo 0 xO lnm, cen eemenu shee diemcameibsiepe Ase i E ‘i “ 2 pre fe Loree iy, S, : po : 2 4 a aad . a fa. fe ebro wana | | 7” 0 eggtg wlmepotg”. Hef we ago al me L/L 729,00. PUMPING STATION {a “ E,709.00~ LBS TEE TESTE = ee ae J , hoes, : : ae ; = en Ota te anh ‘ Fy 709. @ “ at : 3 gees ow: pare ~ , 471 707. 00° “oIty OF FLINT, “MICHIGAN xxxEND_PAGE:deq16_b5_0892_4900_0331 ee ass asp Beg ee ores Ante, ee eg . al ? ring remy ~~ Oo one ry _ Elev 72200 £ ? —— — 2 ae bas shown, 4. directions, ea side| of walt - C i ae = {-6" Fille? with ‘ 1-6, </-6" jpillet ph : ae : Cog TP ge Ber S peek ; | Be ee oer betweer) z "Pog. side of woll PRL TIEG OG 9 Se ween “supports <2 Normal. rook: reint shown, . ct : ie PP ; ; : LES 72d.8* } -. 2 Drop ponels af ail supports : _—_ EG 2 oe ‘Mor mal roof reinf shawn. SREY \% $ @ 72" gf Supports, st ore roentical— See Typical SUPPUFS. 2. Drop panets ofall supports a — wall Sectron. ; : wall” Sec#lor. are identical~ See Jypical , i ok ee Hh, small i | Lis : Z¢ OQ co, face. AOMCTIOM WELL. ° ZC 7 eo. face. TROPVS FER. CHAMBER ee an a a ei Joteel point rings ta tif (ae ends AZ” rank COM. pipe. A NN 4B BO. Reservoir Transfer ldrie. oN eel 14,54 aoe Pring von x e i Leove out 4 tile 4 “ty ~ dowels locks: as Pipl @ 6! \ 8 ee Woah Vormel Floor. ‘rein Sieaati ge ag Floor Elen: 708,50 “ Bog See Dug “22157 if for Frans, ae | Eley, TOPOO\-- | ~ af ee Ong "22159, for this Area, 2) bese with leon Conc. . os ‘ ( Seeyonac. ELevarion. . LET Ate. 4z" ‘RC, TRANSEER CINE, RVR. WALL. Watt Si SECTION 4 AT or TRANsreR nu CuanoeR. Seale: Bere Scale: £4 Bre” Watt Section East oF JRANSEER, CHAMBER Seole: % Sito" COMCBETE Cofté foe ALEOING, See. 3” ica Lotion Be: Ua OH eariage Zz. 2isé “SHAS. Secrionas Luan A. “A Rook Elev..varies- fron, 726.00 to. 726. 50. , a orner be t 1 Borsa} roof rein€ shown, - _ é ca - a : Nore: P58 md 16 FB" Fit h ee a°® oe ; ‘ae Ble 7 ... Aermal walt = B46 led with $8 Ole” bors between supports, - eink shown: % 46 ee" ‘ot: supports. Coat this end of # with a . Treat For eeiens: L¢ 6 + — 6s xB ” S5tee/ Be ee stop Scolé:F S/o i fs 1 rf Trercal, CRoss Secro : For. ‘etotion ae Aire Bt Coawels ©B” oo - 8 Cath’ face.} Nore: / yshing — ag Col. Spiral, Mormat: fioor reinf. Shown. “i lon th (OF Spiral 16, -la 1s bon: ; NS 9 ms . ‘With Cot" Spee 8e/" “ps 640 i +16 ~ % “po YFloor Elen 4 vores > ° .Froln 708. o Fo. POD Ge Floor Elev voriés

OER

Hi Mike, You will be receiving hard copies of the attached OER today. | also wanted to respond to the written comments you provided on the last OER submitted, The following correspond to your numbered comments which | have also attached: 1. Alltables in the report have been revised to correlate the TTHM results to the sample site numbers matching MDEQ records. References to the number of exceedences have also been revised accordingly. 2. The average ozone dosage for April 2015 was 2.4 mg/l. The system is capable of much more than that, but higher dosages are not necessary and bromate formation is a concern. 3. The current model is adequate to evaluate the transmission main size along Dupont and Bishop from a conservative standpoint. Although all model domestic demands have not been revised yet, the fire flow demand is much larger and dictates the main size. Additionally, domestic demands will be decreasing. 4. Veolia provided recommendations in a Technical Memo dated 3/30/15. In that memo Veolia recommended a permanganate dosage of about 1.0 mg/I and referred to 10% TOC removal improvement. Pages 4 and 17 of the report have been revised accordingly. Comment noted — no changes to report needed. City staff are investigating the existence of valves shown on the system map for the pressure zone. Comment noted — no changes to report needed. Agree. Options in the report to reduce storage used have been revised so as not to limit the volume of Reservoir #3. 9. Comment noted — no changes to report needed. ANA Jeffrey R. Hansen Senior Project Manager Lockwood, Andrews & &Newnam, Inc. Inc. KACO WN DALY COMPANY 1311 South Linden Road, Suite B « Flint, MI 48532 T 810.820.2682 C 810.333.3201 CONFIDENTIALITY AND PRIVILEGE NOTICE: This email communication, including any and all attachments, (collectively, this “Communication’), is intended solely for the person(s) to whom it is addressed. This Communication may contain information that is privileged, confidential and/or proprietary. Any unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this Communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this Communication in error, please contact the sender immediately and destroy any and all copies of this Communication. xxxEND_PAGE:deq04_b578_6377_6764_117 Operational Evaluation Report city of Flint . : : Trihalomethane _ Formation Concern _ May.29, 2015 _ In Response to February 2015 Sample Results 4 Lockwood, Andrews & Newnam, Inc. : A“LEOJA DALY COMPANY. xxxEND_PAGE:deq04_b578_6377_6764_118 CITY OF FLINT Operational Evaluation Report May 29, 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS “l. Background _Water Supply Trai 1 Recent Improvements an‘ 1. Phase | WTP Improvements _..2. Past Pilot Study & Testing Improvements for Full Time Oper: g by Oth 6. Conclusions _ ‘ Lockwood, Andrews Page i [an & Newnam, Inc. ALEG A DALY COMPANY xxxEND_PAGE:deq04_b578_6377_6764_119 CITY OF FLINT Operational Evaluation Report May 29, 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS perational Recommendations frastructure Change Recomm C._ Distribution System _ <i Lockwood, Andrews Page ii [on & Newnam, Inc. A LEG A DALY COMPANY | xxxEND_PAGE:deq04_b578_6377_6764_120 CITY OF FLINT Operational Evaluation Report May 29, 2015 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and Michigan Department of Environmental Quality (MDEQ) regulations require that public water suppliers test drinking water quarterly throughout the distribution system for disinfectant by-products (DBP’s). Two categories of DBP’s, tri-halomethanes (THM) and halo-acetic acids (HAA5), are regulated and must be tested for. The City of Flint began operation of their water treatment plant (WTP) full time with the Flint River as the source on April 25, 2014. Since that time, five quarters of samples taken have resulted in annual average violations for total THM. Prior to the first violation (Nov. 2014), the City hired Lockwood, Andrews & Newnam, Inc. (LAN) to complete this Operational Evaluation Report (OER) in conformance with EPA guidelines with the goal to determine the cause(s) of high levels of THM and evaluate possible solutions. The EPA promulgated the Stage 2 Disinfectants and Disinfection By-Products Rule (DBPR) in January 2006 which set maximum contaminant levels (MCLs) for total trihalomethanes (TTHM) and HAAS based on an annual running average, tested quarterly, for a given sampling location. The City of Flint reports levels from 8 sampling test locations. Of the five quarterly sampling cycles since Flint began operating the WTP full time, HAA5 levels have been acceptable but TTHM levels have exceeded the MCL. Four sampling sites were in violation following the third sampling cycle and those sites in violation have been reduced to a single site for the most recent cycle. A number of issues were identified as possibly contributing to the high THM levels measured. 1. Inefficient ozone system functionality which led to in increased chlorine feed. 2.. Upstream source influences in terms of increased chlorine demand. 3. Bypass stream around softening contributed to chlorine demand and increased total organic carbon (TOC) levels in the effluent. 4, Unlined cast iron pipes in the distribution system contributing to chlorine demand. 5. High water age in the distribution system due to: a. Broken valves causing less than ideal flow patterns b. Inefficient pump station pressure zones c. Water storage volumes in excess of that needed for today’s demands d. Oversized water mains e. Low water demands 6. High chlorine demand in filters. 7, High THM formation potential (THMFP) in source water. 8. Less than optimal removal of THM precursors. A graphical representation of how the factors above relate to the timing of THM compliance sampling is shown as Table 1. Compliance sampling dates are hatched. Each row in Table 1 describes a factor than can lead to increased THM levels and the table defines when each of those factors applied. Note the convergence of nearly all factors around the second sampling period on August 21, 2014 to create what appears to be a worst case scenario. The table also shows that the factors listed as those that the City can control have been addressed prior to cl sampling periods. Monthly operating report data up to May 1, 2015 is depicted on the Table, Page 1 of 22 Lockwood, Andrews &Newnam,Inc. LEO A DALY COMPANY COMPANY xxxEND_PAGE:deq04_b578_6377_6764_121 ZZ 40 Z aBeq Uo! ANVdWOD AIVO V 033 ¥ “OU} UBUMON PF SMOIPUY "POOMyd07] TABLE 7 ~ SUMMARY OF NEGATI Softening bypass stiéam over’ 20% of plant flow | lOzone system not teeding optimally eee Using tull water storage capacity of WSR & CSR IChiarine teed at WTP 7.0 mg/ or'more Dates of occurrence Dates of occurrence and expected to repeat in future years Comptiance sampling date Factors under Flint stall control fint River characteristics system factors INFLUENCES ON THM COMPLIANCE SAMPLING. S10z ‘6c ACW Henjeaq jeuoHessdO INIT 40 ALD Hoday uo: xxxEND_PAGE:deq04_b578_6377_6764_122 CITY OF FLINT Operational Evaluation Report May 29, 2015 ACTION PLAN The City of Flint has signed an agreement with the Karegnondi Water Authority (KWA) to purchase raw water drawn from Lake Huron. The KWA system is currently under construction and expected to be operational by late 2016. The water supply from Lake Huron will have entirely different water quality characteristics from the Flint River and those characteristics are expected to yield drastically reduced DPB formation. With that, non- structural options to help reduce THM levels are much preferred over solutions requiring new construction. Therefore, two categories of actions have been devised: Stage 1 being actions that can be completed relatively quickly without major construction and Stage 2 consisting of either long term actions or solutions requiring major construction. The City is actively working to complete Stage 1 actions as soon as possible. Stage 2 actions are to be implemented only if Stage 1 actions are ineffective in adequately reducing TTHM levels and therefore Stage 2 is contingent upon the outcome of Stage 1. As of the date of this report, status updates for action items are shown in red. Stage 1 — Immediate Actions ¢ Hire third party water quality expert to complete independent ‘water audit’ o The City hired Veolia Water to review all water quality related operations, procedures, actions taken and planned responses. Recommendations from Veolia were provided in a report and technical memo dated 3/12/15 and 3/30/15 respectively. ¢ Obtain an in house THM analyzer to allow regular operational monitoring of THM levels o THM analyzer was installed 2/17/15. * Hire ozone system manufacturer to troubleshoot ozone system o Manufacturer and controls programmers performed on site evaluations followed by corrective modifications in January 2015. « Bench scale jar testing © Match existing process and assess possible areas of improvement = Existing process was simulated and an evaluation of existing chemical feed dosages has been completed by LAN. = Existing process TOC profile was developed by Veolia. o Simulate potential modifications to treatment process = Soda ash softening evaluation completed and PAC feed testing completed by LAN. o Evaluate coagulation and flocculation polymer aid feeds to assist with TOC removal * Evaluations of polymer aids completed by LAN and PVS Technologies. © WTP operational changes o Discontinue softening bypass stream to reduce chlorine demand = Operational directive has been set to soften no less than 80% of flow. o Disinfection of filter beds to reduce chlorine demand = Utility Service Group contracted by City and condition assessment completed. Controls improvements have been completed. o Begin coagulation and flocculation polymer aid feeds to assist with TOC removal if bench scale test results are positive = Jar testing completed to date has not indicated a meaningful benefit to feeding coagulation/flocculation polymer aids. Increased ferric doses have been implemented at the WTP based on positive jar test results. Page 3 of 22 Lockwood, Andrews &Newnam, Inc. A ® LEG A DALY COMPANY A DALY COMPANY xxxEND_PAGE:deq04_b578_6377_6764_123 CITY OF FLINT Operational Evaluation Report May 29, 2015 e Increase water main flushing efforts to minimize stagnant water o Flushing efforts are ongoing as needed based on chlorine residual levels measured in the system. « Water system modeling to identify areas with high water age and potential solutions | o The water model has been improved and preliminary results, including system wide water age, have been produced. Water demand updates and | reconciliation with operator’s data are underway with expected completion in | mid June, 2015. | o Cedar Street Pump Station potential recirculation = Water model analysis to be completed in June 2015, o West Side Pump Station potential recirculation = Water model analysis to be completed in June 2015. o Storage tank volume use = Operating levels of West Side and Cedar Street reservoirs have been lowered to reduce water age eo Possible broken closed vaive locations = Model has been updated with known broken valve locations. Model results are being evaluated for indications of other possible broken | valves. City has also initiated valve assessment program. | o Locations in need of flushing | | | = High water age areas have been identified in the water model, Further evaluation is expected to be done by July 1, 2015 to determine most effective flushing points. Stage 2 — Contingent Actions e Fix ozone system o Repairs have been made to gauges and programming and the system is producing proper ozone and functioning under manual operation. Further minor repairs are planned for the 1* quarter 2015 to allow automatic operation, « Start feeding coagulation and flocculation polymer aids to lower TOC, if not completed in Stage 1 o Polymers evaluated by LAN did not demonstrate notable benefit. o PVS Technologies evaluated a proprietary polymer that showed little benefit. © Convert to lime and soda ash softening © Cost effective analysis to be developed, if necessary, based on effectiveness of new GAC filter media. ¢ Change disinfectant to chloramine or chlorine dioxide until KWA o Cost effective analysis to be developed, if necessary, based on effectiveness of new GAC filter media. ¢ Install pre-oxidant feed at intake to optimize ozone disinfection o Permanganate feed at intake was evaluated! and recommended by Veolia to help with TOC removal. ¢ Replace filter media with granular activated carbon (GAC) media o Design of filter anthracite media replacement with GAC media is in progress. GAC medlia is expected to be installed by mid July 2015. « Implement advanced treatment for THM precursor removal o Cost effective analysis to be developed, if necessary, based on effectiveness of new GAC filter media. , Page 4 of 22 Lockwood, Andrews &Newnam, inc, KLEO A DALY COMPANY xxxEND_PAGE:deq04_b578_6377_6764_124 CITY OF. FLINT Operational Evaluation Report May 29, 2015 ® Increased main flushing based on water modeling results o Water model analysis to be completed in June 2015. e Continue valve replacements with water model assistance o Water model analysis to be completed in June 2015. e Emphasize cast iron pipes on water main replacement priority list o Flint has bid replacement of over 2 miles of 24” steel pipe along Dupont and Bishop Streets to be completed this coming construction season if the City can allocate funds. The water main section is considered a critical transmission main, and is expected to contribute to decreases in water age when complete. THM samples have been taken and tested 5 times for regulatory reporting since the City began using the Flint River for supply. Numerous additional sets of samples have been taken by the City for internal operational monitoring. Compliance samples were taken in May 2014, August 2014, November 2014, January 2015, February 2015, and May 2015. The average of all eight sample sites in May 2014 was 100.2 ug/l and the most recent average of samples taken in May 2015 was 56.7 ug/l. The MCL defined by the EPA is 80 ug/l. Page 5 of 22 Lockwood, Andrews &Newnam, Inc. KLE A DALY COMPANY xxxEND_PAGE:deq04_b578_6377_6764_125 CITY OF FLINT nse Operational Evaluation Report % May 29, 2015 . 1 BACKGROUND The City of Detroit Water and Sewer Department (DWSD) has historically provided drinking water for the City of Flint and Genesee County. In the late 1990's growing concern regarding the reliability of the DWSD supply prompted the City of Flint to upgrade their existing water treatment plant (WTP). Those improvements, defined as Phase I, were completed in 2005 and were intended to allow the Flint WTP to operate, using the Flint River as the source, for an extended period of time in the event that supply from the DWSD was temporarily interrupted. Additionally, the Phase | improvements set the stage for Flint to break free from dependence on the DWSD supply and water charges over which they had no control, A. WATER SUPPLY TRANSITION 1. Detroit Water and Sewer Department (DWSD) Until recently the Genesee County and Flint region had been provided drinking water by the DWSD. However, due to excessive cost increases and reliability issues with the DWSD system other options had to be explored. 2. Karegnondi Water Authority (KWA) In 2010 the Karegnondi Water Authority (KWA) was formed for the purpose of developing a new water supply from Lake Huron to serve the region in lieu of the DWSD supply and the City of Flint elected to join. The KWA expects the new system which is currently being constructed to become operational by the fall of 2016. 3. Flint River — Interim Period With a renewing water supply agreement between Flint and the DWSD being terminated by the DWSD (effective April 30, 2014) and the KWA system not expected to be operational until late 2016, the City of Flint decided. to initiate operation of the existing WTP full time utilizing the Flint River as the interim water source. A variety of WTP improvements were necessary for the Flint plant to become a full time plant. For purposes of this report, Phase Il improvements to the Flint WTP are improvements intended to allow the plant to operate full time with either the Flint River as the source or the KWA supply as the source. B. TTHM VIOLATIONS The EPA and MDEQ method of determining if TTHM sample results exceed the MCL uses a locational running annual average (LRAA). Flint’s first TTHM violation was cited by the MDEQ following the third cycle of sampling completed in November 2014, Of the 8 sampling sites, 4 were in violation. At that time the MDEQ used the following calculation for determining if the MCL had been violated: (2 x current quarter value + previous 2 quarter values) / 4 = Operational Evaluation Value Flint has now completed tests for 5 quarters and a straight annual running average applies. Based on samples taken on May 18, 2015 the number of sites in violation of the THM MCL limit has decreased to one. The May 2014 average across all test sites was 100.2 ug/l and the May 2015 average is 56.7 ug/l with the highest individual site result of 72.4 ug/l. Test results are tabulated in Table 2. HAA5 sample results are shown in Table 3, of which Flint has had no violations. Page 6 of 22 Lockwood, Andrews - &Newnam,Inc. inc. RUEO A DALY COMPARY DALY COMPANY xxxEND_PAGE:deq04_b578_6377_6764_126 CITY OF FLINT. Operational Evaluation Report May 29, 2015 TABLE z= TTHM TEST RESULTS CO) WIP Tap 1) 3719 Davison McDonalds 2) 822 S, Dort Hwy BP Gas Sta. 3) 3302 S. Dort Hwy Liquor Palace 4) 3606 Corunna 46.1 60.8 53.6 111.6 127.2 63.5 72.2 60.2 Taco Bell 79.2 | 181.3 54.7 78.1 72.0 Papo) mening 106.4 | 196.2 50.8 | 1052 | 935 Saliern Housing. 82.2 | 112.4 72.7 | 68.3 | 65.9 als} Cli 88.2 | 144.4 60.5 | 76.4 | 69.4 | eee 1 Sacinaw 96.5 118.3 45.2 67.7 54.9 TTHM MCL = 80 ug/l WIP Tap a 36 (taken June 14, 2014) wa | a Davis Baan 64 43 16 9.0 16 33.0 21.0 oe 38 40 21 9.0 16 27.0 | 21.5 Cee teisce Hwy) 59 31 15 9.0 17 26.8 | 18.0 a 50 24 15 9.0 16 24.5 16.0 peaee ening 55 17 24 9.0 15 | 26.3 16.3 Se Hotere 41 25 5 2.0 10 18.3 | 10.5 oe 49 30 17 9.0 22 26.3 19.5 N. lint im | 48 37 18 9.0 17 | 28.0 | 20.3 HAAS MCL = 60 ug/l C. WATER TREATMENT PLANT RECENT IMPROVEMENTS & STATUS 1. Phase | WTP Improvements Since 1965, the Flint WTP has remained a secondary or backup supply system to the DWSD primary supply. Typically the secondary supply for a public water system is expected to be needed only during emergency situations and normally is designed for short term operation such as providing the average daily demand for a few days. Conversely, Phase | improvements were designed with the intent to upgrade the Flint WTP in order to allow for an extended short term period (6 weeks) because of the perceived high risk that the DWSD supply would fail and remain out of service for an Page 7 of 22 Lockwood, Andrews & &Newnam, Inc. Inc. RLEG A DALY COMPANY. LEQ A DALY COMPANY xxxEND_PAGE:deq04_b578_6377_6764_127 CITY OF. FLINT. Operational Evaluation Report May 29, 2015 extended duration. Regardless, the Flint WTP was still intended to serve as a standby ‘plant and as such the Phase | improvements lacked redundancies that would be required for a primary supply WTP. 2. Past Pilot Study & Testing During design of the Phase | improvements a treatability study was completed by Alvord, Burdick & Howson, LLC (AB&H) in 2002. The Treatability Study evaluated the current treatment processes that are in place at the Flint WTP today with the Flint River as the source. The report recommended the following: TABLE ame — 2002 WTP TREATMENT RECOMMENDATIONS se Point of E = Purpose Application _ Sodium permanganate Zebra mussel control Troe Taste & odor removal, disinfection | Diffusor basin Coagulation Rapid mix Turbidity & TOC removal Rapid mix Turbidity & TOC removal Floc basin Ozone Ferric chloride Coag aid polymer Floc aid polymer Lime Softening Softening basin Soda ash Softening Softening basin Carbon dioxide pH adjustment Recarb basin Media filters Filtration N/A Chlorine Disinfection Filter effluent Of the recommended items, zebra mussel control, coagulant and flocculation polymer aids, and soda ash feed have not been incorporated into the treatment process. 3. Phase Il WTP Improvements for Full Time Operation Phase i] WTP improvements are those needed to convert the Flint WTP from a back- up supply to a primary supply plant. A number of improvements have already been constructed as they were necessary to operate full time when treating water from the Flint River. The improvements under the title of Phase II that have been completed or are nearly complete include installation of the future raw water feed connection point and valving for the KWA supply, upgrades to the lime sludge lagoon, the lime sludge lagoon decant and disposal system, decant pump station and force main, installation of mid-point chlorination before filtration, and upgrade of the electric feed sub- station. Additional improvements to the Flint WTP that are to be completed to become part of the normal treatment process using water supplied by the KWA are: « New oxygen and nitrogen storage facilities for the ozone system (under construction) e New coagulant feed system Electrical © Pump Station #4 upgrades (under construction) © SCADA and controls upgrades o Filter transfer pump station feeders | ¢ Pump replacements and VFD installation in the low and high service pump | station (under construction) ' * Filter transfer pump station to Dort Reservoir e Facility security improvements Page 8 of 22 Lockwood, Andrews &Newnam,Inc. Kit A DALY COMPANY xxxEND_PAGE:deq04_b578_6377_6764_128 CITY OF FLINT Operational Evaluation Report 4 May 29, 2015 5 : ee ao Il, SOURCE WATER EVALUATION A, DATA ANALYSIS Based on past data collected and the 2002 Treatability Study by AB&H, the Flint River water quality varies seasonally with higher hardness and alkalinity experienced in the winter. Higher magnesium concentrations are also experienced in the winter, adding difficulty to the settling process due to neutrally buoyant floc. General water quality average characteristics recorded for the 2002 Treatability Study as compared with average characteristics recorded in 2014 are shown in Table 5 below. TABLE 5 FLINT RIVER WATER QUALITY CHARACTERISTICS ‘Hardness - a 870-1230 2001 Apr—Oct (7300 max) 2014 10.3 1900-9000 May—Oct 522ii4 | 207 (48,300 max) ney The Flint River characteristics do not appear to have changed significantly over the past 10+ years. Note that near the time Flint initiated withdrawal from the Flint River investigation by City staff revealed a sewer leak upstream of the plant that may have contributed to the total Coliform count. The leak was subsequently repaired. B. CONCLUSIONS Considering the minor changes in Flint River water quality, much of the information contained in the 2002 Treatability Study by AB&H remains relevant today. Data from that report assumed to be consistent today include the following: e Flint River is influenced by groundwater from a dolomitic aquifer ¢ Hardness varies seasonally with higher hardness and alkalinity in the winter ¢ Hardness, alkalinity, magnesium concentrations tend to be reduced by run-off In development of the 2002 Treatability Study, processes were simulated which resulted in low THM levels. Therefore, information contained in that report was used to assist with establishing a baseline jar testing procedure as discussed further in Section Ill. Page 9 of 22 Lockwood, Andrews &Newnam, Inc. Inc. LEO A DALY COMPANY LEO A DALY COMPANY xxxEND_PAGE:deq04_b578_6377_6764_129 CITY OF FLINT Operational Evaluation Report Ei! : May 29, 2015 ay i aa IH. TREATMENT PROCESS EVALUATION A, EXISTING PROCESS DESCRIPTION The existing WTP consists of an intake with screening from the Flint River, low lift pumping, ozonation, rapid mix, flocculation, settling, softening, recarbonation, filtration, storage and high service pumping. A process diagram is shown as Figure 1. 1. Intake A 72” diameter pipe draws water from the Flint River through 2 traveling screens to the low lift pump structure. No chemicals are currently fed for Zebra mussel control or pre-oxidation as recommended by the 2002 Treatability Study. Manual removal of zebra mussels is more economical than installation of chemical feed equipment considering the short term need, 2. Ozone There are 2 ozone generators designed to provide adequate ozone for a WTP flow of up to 36 mgd. There are 3 ozone contact basins. The ozone generators were designed to produce 900 Ibs/day at 10% concentration and up to 1300 Ibs/day at 6% concentration each. Prior to recent repairs, readings indicated a production rate of approximately 700 Ibs/day at 4% concentration. It is possible that before the recent improvements the ozone feed might not have been optimized. In fact, it is known that less than optimal ozonation previously led to increased chlorine feed which would have contributed to THM formation. 3. Rapid Mix East and West rapid mix chambers allow chemical feed prior to the flocculation basins. Each rapid mix chamber is equipped with a 5 hp mixer. 4. Coagulation / Flocculation The WTP contains two equally sized flocculation basins, east and west, and each basin provides tapered or gradually slowed mixing from inlet to outlet. There are fifteen 2 hp mixers for each basin with VFDs to control mixing speed. The 2002 Treatability Study recommended feeding both coagulation and flocculation polymer aids. Neither polymer aid is being used today because turbidity and TOC removals have been sufficient to meet regulatory requirements. 5. Settling Primary clarification takes place within 3 basins containing plate settlers. The settlers are operating as designed but are due for cleaning. 6. Softening Again, there are two basins for softening: east and west. Each basin is 120’ in diameter and contains a solids contact softening unit. Each softening basin/unit has a design capacity of 18 mgd. The east clarifier has an effluent weir imbalance that the City intends to fix when low demands allow for construction. Low lift pumping limitations, flow control to the basins, malfunctioning polymer feed pumps, control restrictions on residuals removal, and fluctuating demands have made it difficult for WTP staff to stabilize the softening process. Softening is accomplished by feeding lime. The decision was made by the City not to feed soda ash in order to remove non-carbonate hardness because acceptable hardness levels could be achieved with lime feed only and softening is short term until Lake Huron water becomes available. Lime and soda ash softening is a possible consideration to assist with TOC removal and thus reduce THM formation. Page 10 of 22 Lockwood, Andrews & Newnam, Inc. ® LEO A DALY COMPANY LEO A DALY COMPANY xxxEND_PAGE:deq04_b578_6377_6764_130 CITY OF FLINT Operational Evaluation Report May 29, 2015 7. Recarbonation Recarbonation for pH adjustment is accomplished in east and west recarbonation basins between and to the north of the softening basins. Carbon dioxide storage and feed equipment is located west of the recarbonation basins. 8. Filtration Filtration is accomplished with 12 dual media filters, equally sized and designed to filter 3.0 mgd each. Media consists of 12” of sand and 18” of anthracite. The filters have been operated intermittently over the years due to the standby nature of the WTP and until recently, chlorine injection took place downstream of the filters. It is possible some microbial growth had developed in the filters leading to increased chlorine demand. Late 2014, the City recently hired a contractor to upgrade the electrical controls for the filters and that work has been completed. 9. Disinfection Disinfection is provided by ozonation and by feeding chlorine. Ozonation occurs at the front end of the WTP. Chlorine is fed prior to filtration and prior to finish water storage / high service pumping. The intermediate chlorine injection location was recently constructed under the Phase II, Segment 1 contract. 10. Clear Well & Pumping The pump building sits adjacent to a 3 MG clear well and contains both low and high service pumps. B. JAR TESTS / EXPERIMENTS 1. Approach There are several well practiced methods by which DBPs can be reduced. First, the disinfectant can be changed to an alternate that has a lower tendency to form DBPs. Second, additional treatment systems such as activated carbon or air stripping (depending on the nature of the precursors) can be added to remove DBP precursors. Lastly, the existing treatment processes can be optimized to remove as much DBP precursor as possible. Of these options, optimizing existing treatment processes is the only strategy that does not require the construction of new and expensive facilities. It is anticipated that Flint will be receiving Lake Huron water by late 2016 and this water will have a completely different chemistry from the Flint River. Major process changes instituted to address THM levels using Flint River water are likely to be unnecessary for Lake Huron water and may even be inappropriate. Therefore, those options which require addition of new treatment processes are undesirable at this time. In recognition of this upcoming change in water source, efforts for this study have concentrated on improving the existing processes, rather than adding new ones. New treatment processes will only be recommended if operational changes to the existing treatment train prove ineffective. | | Recent sample test results suggest that most of the DBPs are formed in the distribution system rather than within the treatment plant. Therefore, the most logical approach is to reduce the DBP formation potential (DBPFP) rather than simply lowering the levels of DBPs leaving the plant. During bench scale testing, formation potential (FP) levels | were the primary indicator of success or failure of proposed process modifications. | 2. Protocol Bench scale pilot testing is intended to reflect actual plant operating and hydraulic conditions so the bench scale treatment units were sized based on various Lockwood, Andrews. Page 11 of 22 Ka] p] & Newnam, inc. RTE A DALY COMPANY xxxEND_PAGE:deq04_b578_6377_6764_131 CITY OF FLINT Operational Evaluation Report May 29, 2015 dimensionless factors to ensure the pilot treatment matched the actual system. Bench scale ozonation was not practical due to time and cost limitations. Therefore, water samples were withdrawn from the plant ozone basin effluent. These samples were transported to the laboratory and dispensed into square testing jars. The jars were used to simulate rapid mix, three-stage flocculation, and settling. Rapid mix and flocculation conditions were matched to the plant based on “Gt” values, The “G” value is a measure of the mixing intensity and is a function of mix time, viscosity of the liquid, and mixing power applied to the water. “Gt” then, is a size scaling factor where time has been accounted for. Settling time was scaled to match the shorter settling depth of the testing jars. After settling, samples were decanted from the test jars. The decanted samples were then lime softened; softening conditions were similarly matched on the basis of “Gt’. Carbon dioxide was sparged into the samples to reduce the pH. The water was then vacuum filtered through filter paper, sized to simulate the plant’s dual media filters. The samples were dosed with excess chlorine and allowed to react for seven days at 25° C before testing for DBPs to determine the formation potential. The following conditions were applied during testing to properly match small scale testing to actual plant processes. TABLE 6 — BENCH SCALE TEST MIXING INTENSITIES ‘zonation: Rapid Mix 160 Flocculation, Stage 1 55 Flocculation, Stage 1 30 Flocculation, Stage 1 19 Settling : Softening = Recarbonation The primary variables during testing were chemical additions and chemical dosages. Specific chemicals and dosages used for initial testing conditions were selected to reflect current plant usage and the recommendations of the 2002 Treatability Study: TABLE 7 — BENCH SCALE TEST CHEMICAL FEED RATES Chemical | Current Usage | 2002 Study | — Test Values _ Ozonation 4.66 mg/l 1.5 mg/l Ferric Chloride 7.7 mg/l Fe3+ 40 mg/l Fe3+ 7.7 — 80 mg/l Fe3+ Coagulant Aid Polymer Not used 2.0 mg/l 1—2 mg/l Flocculation Aid Polymer Not used 0.05 mg/l 0 — 0.05 mg/l Powdered Activated Carbon Not used N/A 20 — 100 mg/l Lime 120 -— 175 mg/l Soda Ash 0 —~ 52 mg/l Cationic Softening Polymer Anionic Softening Polymer 0.88 mei 0.88 mg/ Fluoride 0.45 mg/l Not used Fed to reach pH of 7.5 +- 0.3 T mei 10 mg/l | / Carbon Dioxide Chlorine Page 12 of 22 Lockwood, Andrews & Newnam, Inc. LEO A DALY COMPANY xxxEND_PAGE:deq04_b578_6377_6764_132 CITY OF FLINT Operational Evaluation Report : May 29, 2015 4 3. Considerations The 2002 Treatability Study did not note significant formation of DBPs. This may be a function of different Flint River water chemistry at that time. However, recognizing the considerable differences in chemical usage and dosages between that study and current operations, those differences in chemical use and dosage are an obvious starting point for optimizing treatment to prevent DBP limit exceedance. Although it is believed that optimization of current treatment can correct the DBP issue, should optimization of present treatment prove insufficient, alternate residual disinfectants (chloramines and chlorine dioxide) will be investigated as additional treatment measures. 4. LAN Test Results Two rounds of jar testing were completed by LAN during the weeks of December 15, 2014 and January 26, 2015. Detailed test data is included in Appendix A. Testing results can be summarized as follows: « Increased dosages of ferric chloride resulted in higher reduction of THMFP. e The currently utilized feed rate of lime at 120 mg/l is appropriate * Softening with soda ash in addition to lime resulted in minor additional THMFP reduction — in the range of 0% - 10%. ¢ The benefits of using a cationic polymer during softening at a dosage range of 0.31 - 3.13 mg/l to help reduce THM’s are unclear ¢ The benefits of using an anionic polymer during softening at a dosage range of 0.09 — 0.88 mg/l to help reduce THM’s are unclear e Feeding PAC was ineffective in reducing THMFP within the dosage range of 20 — 100 mg/l. 5. Testing by Others In addition to jar testing completed by LAN, the chemical supplier who provides | ferric chloride for the City, PVS Technologies, ran tests using their recommended | flocculant polymer aid. Plus, Veolia Water completed jars testing of their own the week of February 16" to analyze other process details and current WTP parameters. Experiments completed by PVS Technologies showed very little TOC removal beyond | that obtained with straight ferric chloride feed. 6. Conclusions Increasing the dose rate of ferric chloride is an operational change that can easily be implemented without the need for any additional equipment. Test results show that over 40% THMFP removal can be obtained with a dosage of 60 mg/l Fe3+ or higher. Increased dosing of ferric chloride would be most ideal coupled with regular raw water TOC monitoring so that TOC levels would dictate the appropriate ferric chloride feed rate. \ | | Softening with soda ash in addition to lime is another option the City should consider if increased ferric chloride doses are not adequate to maintain THM levels under the MCL, particularly during warmer months. Again, monitoring of TOC in the raw water / could provide useful information of when lime/soda ash softening is necessary. Page 13 of 22 Lockwood, Andrews & Newnam, inc. ® LEO A DALY COMPANY LEO A DALY COMPANY xxxEND_PAGE:deq04_b578_6377_6764_133 CITY OF FLINT Operational Evaluation Report May 29, 2015 IV. DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM EVALUATION EPA guidance for the distribution evaluation portion of an OER is focused on identification and isolation of a specific portion of the distribution system that led to the exceedance. The circumstances of Flint’s apparent pending TTHM exeedances are unusual in that a new supply has been implemented which clearly corresponds to the high TTHM sample results. Although the new source is one element in increased TTHM levels, value remains in evaluating the distribution system since water age is also a critical factor. Additionally, there may be distribution improvements that can be made to help alleviate the problem. A. INFRASTRUCTURE 1. Piping According to the most recent MDEQ Sanitary Survey, the distribution system is estimated to contain 70% cast iron, 20% ductile iron, 2% concrete and 8% steel water mains. Based on discussions with City staff, the percentage of cast iron pipe may be higher than that stated in the MDEQ Sanitary Survey. Unlined cast iron pipe can become pitted, allowing colonization sites for microorganisms leading to chlorine demand. Additionally, much of the piping in the system is aged and in poor condition. Increased chlorine demand could be resulting from biofilm in older pipes and from main breaks/repairs. The extent of contribution is not known but any water main replacement project will decrease chlorine demand somewhat if constructed properly. Unfortunately, water main breaks may also assist with decreasing water age by providing unintentional flushing. All things considered, it is impossible to quantify the impact existing piping has on THM formation. The City utilizes City Point software and GPS equipment to document main breaks and prioritize replacements. However, main break information is more pertinent to rusty water complaints and has little relevance to THM levels. Areas that have been targeted for main replacements include the transmission main from the WTP west to Dupont and south to the West Side reservoir, Fenton Road, Atherton Road, Dort Highway, Averil Street, and Boulevard Drive. 2. Storage There are 4 finish water storage tanks and 1 raw water tank as tabulated below: TABLE 8 - STORAGE TANKS ; : Operatin: ‘ Type LW [HWE ‘Bottom | OF | | Dort Reservoir Ground : 730 | 750 i WTP Tank Elevated | Finished ; j 863.0 | 898.0 | WIP Clear Well — PS #4 | Ground | Finished 11’ 15’ | 708.5 | 726.0 | | Cedar Street Reservoir Ground [| Finished - 11’ 737.2 | 757.2 | Westside Reservoir Finished The MDEQ typically recommends providing a minimum finish water storage volume of 1/3 the maximum daily demand (MDD). According to the 2013 MDEQ Sanitary Survey, the 5 and 10 year MDDs are 21.57 mgd and 30.05 mgd respectively, A ; common rule of thumb for clear well storage volume at a WTP is 10% of the design | flow rate. Another general guideline for reliability is to provide total storage to allow / for 2 X the average daily demand plus fire flow demand. For this analysis, fire flow is assumed to be 2,500 gpm for either one industrial fire (2,500 gpm) or a combination of one residential (1,000 gpm) and one commercial (1,500 gpm) fire at a 4 hour duration which results in a total volume of 600,000 gallons. These go-by Page 14 of 22 Lockwood, Andrews &Newnam,Inc. Inc. LEO A DALY COMPANY DALY COMPANY xxxEND_PAGE:deq04_b578_6377_6764_134 CITY OF FLINT Operational Evaluation Report May 29, 2015 approximations are summarized below with the applicable flow rates and are compared to the existing storage volumes currently being utilized. Recommended Volume In Common Practice Flow Rate Volume by ROT Use Clear well 10% of Design Flow 18 MGD 1.8 MG 3.0 MG Finish Storage = 1/3 MDD 30.05 MGD 10.0 MG 37 MG Total Storage = 2 * ADD + FFD 13.87 MGD 28.3 MG 57 MG Based on the values above, it appears the storage volume used in the Flint system could be decreased without negatively effecting reliability. The appropriate volumes of individual tanks will be further evaluated using the water system model and discussed in Section V (C), All reservoirs have baffling to minimize stagnant water. Also, all tanks have been maintained and are in reasonable condition. The Westside reservoir has an exposed roof that is in need of rehabilitation, but its current condition has no influence on THM formation. 3. Pump Stations All pump stations are in good condition but pumps are generally oversized. As an independent consideration, oversized pumps are not a contributing factor to high THM levels. Control of pumps and pressure zones are discussed in detail below. B. OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE 1. Pump Station & Storage Operations Pump stations and storage tank levels are controlled as shown in Table 9. TABLE 9 — FUME STATION CONTROES PS No. 4 Raw Cpa PS No, 4 Finish Match plant flow - - Westside |_ System pressure (elevated tank) | 22.57 33’ Cedar Street [System pressure (elevated tank) 22.5" 33’ Torrey Road | Distr. — Brown/Bradley < 45 psi > 45 psi Cedar Street and Westside pump stations are operated as needed and they are alternated. Typically, Cedar Street is run in the morning and Westside is run in the evening and reservoirs for each are filled during low demand periods at night. Westside, Cedar Street and Torrey Road pump stations are used to boost system pressure when high demands warrant it, but there are not well defined pressure zones within the system. Therefore, the possibility exists that water is being recirculated allowing for increased water age. 2. Booster Disinfection Practices Booster disinfection is provided at the Cedar Street and Westside pump stations. When sustained residuals are not provided by chlorine feed at the WTP, sodium hypochlorite is applied at the reservoirs while being filled. Page 15 of 22 Lockwood, Andrews &Newnam, Inc. ne. LEG A DALY COMPANY. LEG A DALY COMPANY xxxEND_PAGE:deq04_b578_6377_6764_135 CITY OF FLINT Operational Evaluation Report May 29, 2015 q a AA weenie” 3. Changes in System Demands ‘ Water demands in the City have been declining since the 1960's as the population has dropped. As a result, many of the water system components are oversized including storage tanks and water mains which both increase the time for water to reach the user.

Flint Filter Media Change to GAC

Hi Mike, Attached is our preliminary basis of design. We are currently working through details with GAC suppliers to determine the best specific media for Flint, but the Filtrasorb 300 and 400 series from Calgon or equivalent appear to be the best suited. Please note that both meet AWWA B604, but are questionable by Ten States Standards (TSS) as TSS are non- specific for GAC capping. According to Calgon, their Filtrasorb product has been approved by DEQ at numerous plants including Ann Arbor, Grosse Pointe Farms, Manistique, and Alpena. Also note we intend to add a chlorine feed point following filtration while maintaining the intermediate feed point, with valving, so chlorine can be added at either point. The intermediate feed point prior to filtration can then be used as a means of disinfecting the filters in the future, if necessary. Jeffrey R. Hansen Senior Project Manager Lockwood, Andrews & Newnam, inc. REUD A BAR. T 810.820.26 wow 82 C CONFIDENTIALITY AND PRIVILEGE NOTICE: This email communication, including any and all attachments, (collectively, this “Communication”), is intended solely for the person(s) to whom it is addressed. This Communication may contain information that is privileged, confidential and/or proprietary. Any unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this Communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this Communication in error, please contact the sender immediately and destroy any and all copies of this Communication. xxxEND_PAGE:deq16_b5_0892_4900_0954 CITY OF FLINT WTP Filter Media Replacement Basis of Design Notes Max. Expected Flow Rate = 30.0 mgd = 20,833 gpm = 2,785 cft/min Max. Day May 2014 - April 2015 = 25.4 mgd = 17,639 gpm = 2,358 cft/min Avg. Day May 2014 - April 2015 = 18.3 mgd = 12,708 gpm = 1,699 eft/min Design Flow Rate = 24.0 mgd = 16,667 gpm = 2,228 cft/min Min. Expected Flow Rate = 8.0 mgd = 5,556 gpm = 743 cft/min Area / Filter = 700 sft Number of Filters = 12 mgd 30.0 24.0 Loading (gpm/sit) = 2.48 Top of Underdrain elev = 723,58 Washwater Trough Weir elev = 730.67 Operating Water Level = 734.00 Top of Filter Basin / Floor elev = 736.00 Filter BW Dimensional D = 7.08 Existing Sand D = 12.00 inches = 1.00 ft Existing Anthracite D = 18.00 inches = 1.50 ft Proposed Sand D = 12.00 inches = 1.00 ft Proposed GAC D = 18.00 inches = 1.50 ft See following pages for details Proposed Water Depth = 7.92 ft Max Cold BW Flow rate / filter = 9800 gpm = 14.0 gpm/sit To match current BW flow rate Max Warm BW Flow rate / filter = 14000 gpm = 20.0 gpm/sit Use when water temp > 65 degrees Max Sand Expanded D = 14.2 inches = 1.18 ft= 18% Occurs at cold temps Max GAC Expanded D = 34.20 inches = 2.85 ft = 90% Total BW Expanded D = 48.40 inches = 4.03 ft Proposed BW Freeboard = 3.05 ft Proposed # of Filters to Replace 12 GAC Volume = 12,600 cit GAC apparent density = 33.7 Ibs/cft GAC Total Weight = 424,620 Ibs = 212.3 tons mgd___30.0 | 24.0 | 8.0 EBCT (min) = 45 5.7 17.0 Propose to relocate intermediate chlorine feed to inlet side of weir chamber following filtration Intermediate CL2 feed point to remain in place as means to disinfect filters in the future, if needed mgd 30.0 24.0 Contact time (min) = 5 68.8 CT= 99. 123.8 Calculations attached separately Required CT at 1.8 mg/I chlorine, less than 0.5 degrees C, and pH of 8.0 = 56 OX xxxEND_PAGE:deq16_b5_0892_4900_0955 CITY OF FLINT- DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC UTILITIES Date: 05/20/15 GAC Filter Evaluation H Filter Media Analysis 2015 ist Stage N Viscosity (centipoise) 1.79355 Dynamic Viscosity (# -sec/s' 3.746E-05 Water Density (#/c 62.42 Mass Density (# -sec/ft” 1.940 WUAAN 10 States (1G States Interprete: Filtrasorb 400 Filtrasorb 300 Alt Media Type Bed Depth {in) Uniformity Coefficient Effective Size (mm 60% Size (mm d90% Size (mm) Porosi Specific Gravity Media Density (#/ Min. Fluidization Rate (gpmi Reynolds Number Correction Factor Min. Fluidization Rate (gpm Unhindered Settling Vel. (flsec Expansion Coefficient (n Bed Porosity Coefficient (k Porosity (expanded Bed Depth Expanded {in % Expanded Bed d90gac/d10s Ratio 3443 3.508 4.746 6.805 3.198 Discussion‘Notes Lockwood, Andrews & Newnam, inc. A LEQ A BALY COMPANY xxxEND_PAGE:deq16_b5_0892_4900_0956 CITY OF FLINT- DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC UTILITIES Date: 05/20/15 GAC Filter Evaluation By: JRH Filter Media Analysis 2015 ist Stage Data Entry: Water Temperature (F°) | 80 NS S d90% Size (mm) Expanded Bed Correction Factor Lackwood, Andrews. & Newnam, inc, xxxEND_PAGE:deq16_b5_0892_4900_0957 CITY OF FLINT WTP CT CALCS TIME FROM FILTERS EFFLUENT TO 1ST TAP amet Weir chamber, pre-baffle E B_ |Weir chamber, post-baffle 26.75| 8.5 12.4 3.06 Effluent pipe Cc we - bldg face 48 4.00 16.00) 201 30.0 46.4 1.0 0.07 3.69) 24.0] 37.1 0.09) 8.0/ 124 0.27: D bldg face - junct well 48 4.00| 401.00 5039] 30.0 46.4 1.0 1.81 3.69} 24.0) 37.1 2.26) 8.0] 12.4 6.793 Res. 3 E dunct well 12.00) 704.00 3240] 30.0 46.4 1.0 1.16 0.17) 24.0} 37.1 1.45] 8.0} 12.4 4.363 F Clear well 140.00 709.00} 247,800] 30.0 46.4 0.5 44.49 0.05] 24.0] 37.1 55.61 8.0) 12.4] 166.83; G Transfer chamber 7.00| 55.25 15.0| 704.00 5,801 30.0 46.4 1.0 2.08 0.06} 24.0} 37.1 2.60) 8.0} 12.4 7.81 H Suction well 9.00] 25.75 15.0] 704.00 3,476] 30.0 46.4 1.0 1.25 0.12) 24.0) 37.1 1.56] 8.0] 12.4 4.683 Pump | Suction pipe 36 3.00 12.00) 85} 30.0 46.4 1.0 0.03 6.57) 24.0) 37.1 0.04} 8.0} 12.4 0.141 Discharge pipe 30 2.50 20.00 93] 30.0 46.4 1.0 0.04 9.46) 24.0) 37.1 0.04} 8.0] 12.4 0.13} K Dis. pipe (to bldg face) 42 3.50 34.00 327] 30.0 46.4 1.0 0.12 4.82) 24.0} 37.1 0.15) 8.0} 12.4 0.44: Finish main 2 L2 bldg face - 1st tee 42 3.50 73.00 702] M2 tee - 1st split 42 3.50| 277.00 2665) Subtotal Total CT time]@ 36 mgd = 55.0 @ 24 mgd = 68.81@ 12 mgd = 206.3: ee ar 2014 2015 Month May dune dul Au Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr Min Av Max Cl2 5.0 47 3.9 3.3 3.1 25 2.0 1.8 1.8 2.1 2.4 2.0 18 29 5.0 IH 7.37 7.48 7.62 7.78 | 7.82 771 7.87 8.07 7.74 7.84 7.89 7.83 7.4 78 8.1 Flow (mgd 30.0) 24.0 8.0) CT = 99.0] 123.8) 371.4] xxxEND_PAGE:deq16_b5_0892_4900_0958 fenuey eouepind Wd3 Buppewyoueg pue Buljyoig uoajuIsSIG 0) 666 Isnony Table C-1. CT Values for Inactivation of Giardia Cysts by Free Chlorine at 0.5°C or Lower CHLORINE (mg/L) CHLORINE CONCENTRATION (mg/L) Source: AWWA, 1991. CONCENTRATION pH<=6 Log Inactivation 75 20 25 30 69 91 114 137 71 94 118 141 73 97 121 145) 123 148 127 162 129 155 79 105 131 157 135 162 138 165 85 113 141 169 143 172 146 175 148 178 91 121 151 181 pH=8.0 15 20 25 3.0 139 185 231 277 143 191 238 286) 148 197 246 295 152 203 253 304 157 209 261 313 161 214 268 321 165 219 274 329 169 225 282 338 173 231 288 346 177 235 294 353 181 241 301 361 184 245 307 368 188 250 313 375 191 255 318 382 pH=6.5 Log Inactivation TS 20 25 3.0 82 109 136 163 84 112 140 169 86 115 143 172 88 117 147 176 90 120 150 180 92 123 153 184 95 126 155 189 97 129 161 193 99 131 164 197 134 169 201 137 171 205 139 174 209 142 178 213 145 181 217 pH=8.5 Log Inactivation 1.0 110 114 113 122 125 129 132 136 139 142 145 148 151 153 15 20 25 3.0 165 219 274 329 171 228 285 342 177 236 295 354 183 243 304 365 188 251 313 376 194 258 323 387 199 265 331 397 204 271 339 407 209 278 348 417 213 284 355 426 218 290 363 435 222 296 370 444 226 301 377 452 230 307 383 460 pH=7.0 Log Inactivation 10 15 20 25 65 98 130 163 67 100 133 167 68 103 137 171 70 105 140 175 72 108 143 179 74 111 147 184 75 113 151 188 77 116 154 193 79 118 157 197 81 121 161 202 82 124 165 206 84 126 168 210 86 129 171 214 87 131 174 218 pH=9.0 Log Inactivation 10 15 20 25 130 195 260 325 136 204 271 339 141 211 281 352 146 219 291 364 150 226 301 376 155 232 309 387 159 239 318 398 163 245 326 408 167 250 333 417 170 256 341 426 174 261 348 435 178 267 355 444 181 272 362 453 184 276 369 460 0.5 pH=7.5 Log Inactivation 1.0 15 20 25 79 119 158 198 80 120 159 199 82 123 164 205 84 127 169 211 86 130 173 216 89 133 177 222 91 137 182 228 93 140 186 233 95 143 191 238 99 149 198 248 99 149 199 248 101 152 203 253 155 207 258 158 211 263 3.0 237 239 246 253 259 266 273 279 286 297 298 304 310 316 SLNVLOZINISIG SNOLUVA AP GFAZIHOY SNOILVALLOVN HOS SSNTIVA LO “OC XIGNAddy xxxEND_PAGE:deq16_b5_0892_4900_0959 (10% FTO8 | FT15 FTO9 FTI0 MAINTAIN 3” PIPING FROM FILTER CLASSIFICATION AREA TO 36” WASH WATER DRAIN CONCRETE ENCASEME! (TYPICAL OF 2) FTO8 | FT16 LADDER TO WEST WASH WATER. | SUPPLY PLATFORM DEHUMIDIFIER ON DEHUMIDIFIER ( STAND. SEE DETAIL SHEET FT23. FILTER GALLERY PIPING LEGEND io | DESCRIPTION EXISTING | NeW WASH WATER SUPPLY — GALLERY YES SERVING FILTERS NO. 5 — NO. 12, INCLUSIVE rm Pe EFFLUENT FILTERS NO. 5 — NO. 12, INCLUSIVE FILTERS NO. 5 — NO. 12, INCLUSIVE YES SOUTH EFFLUENT | es WASH WATER DRAIN FILTERS NO. 5 — NO. 12, INCLUSIVE INFLUENT FILTERS NO. 5 — NO. 12, INCLUSIVE SURFACE WASH YES FILTERS NO. 5 — NO. 12, INCLUSIVE PLANT WATER AND SURFACE WASH WASH AIR SUPPLY — GALLERY WASH AIR SUPPLY FILTERS NO. 5 — NO. 12, INCLUSIVE FILTER TO WASTE CE sama mouse] § | PROCESS WATER B EE | WASH WATER SUPPLY — WEST #l*)sl}]=[=]s/s|s)e]s] ENGINEERS - ARCHITECTS - SCIENTISTS - PLANNERS - SURVEYORS 1425 KEYSTONE AVE., LANSING, MI 48911 TELE. (517) 393-6800 + FAX (517) 272-7390 @ 30” WASH WATER DRAIN co rj -—@————— - = 24” NORTH EFFLUENT==>—(S)—-@ : Cy LJ 30” WASH WATER DRAIN FTO8 | ET15 FTO8 | F114 FTO8 | E114 FTO9 FTO9 FTI0 FT10 ‘ FILTER [NO. 12 FILTER NO. 10 | FILTER| NO. 7-0" €@ 30° WASH WATER DRAIN @ 30” WASH WATER DRAIN Eel 30” MANWAY FL ¢ 30” MANWAY @ 36” WASH WATER DRAIN = = _™ rH - £24" SOUTH EFFLUENT =mm>— (T)-Y : CI “Me = 30” MANWAY 30” MANWAY ¢@ 30” WASH WATER DRAIN g 30” WASH WATER_DRAIN A | lo} (TYP.) FILTER | NO. FILTER NO. 9 i 1 aL NO. ‘ ‘ FLANGE CONNECTION @ FILTER BOX WALL h L ANY DAMAGED OR SPALLING CONCRETE SHALL BE REMOVED. ANY EXPOSED INTEGRALLY CAST HARDWARE AT FLANGE AT FILTER BOX WALL SHALL BE CLEANED BY SSPC—SP—6 COMMERCIAL BLAST, EPOXY COATED WITH TNEMEC SERIES 66, AND PATCHED WITH DURATHIN SINGLE COMPONENT POLYMER—REINFORCED HIGH STRENGTH CEMENT BASED PATCHING MATERIAL OR ENGINEER— APPROVED EQUAL. ORIGINAL PLANAR WALL SURFACE SHALL BE RESTORED. FILTER NO. 6 EXISTING CAST IRON WASH WATER DRAIN DISTANCE FROM FILTER BOX WALL TO FLANGE/ FLANGE FACE DISTANCE "D ¢ 167/24” RISER SEE WASH WATER DRAIN DISSIMILAR MATERIAL ONNECTION DETA SHEET FT14. FILTERS NO. 7, 9, & 11 SIMILAR. FILTERS NO. 5, 8, 10, & 12 OPPOSITE HAND. 30” WASH WATER DRAIN DETAIL SCALE: 1/4° = 1'-0" MICHIGAN CITY OF FLINT DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS & UTILITIES | a RELOCATED SUMP PUMA - PIPING = Shei FT08 | FT14 8 <== 36” DRAIN SEE 30” WASH WATER DRAIN ’ DIA. SAN. DETAIL. EWER M.H. ee ¢ 30° MANWAY FT ¢ 30” MANWAY | RELOCATED |SUMP_ PUMP IPING _ _b3 | + —— TH ere} —>— 30” MANWAY ¢ 30” MANWAY || <==12" SAN. SEWER 7 | @ OF WATER PLANT FILTER PLAN — EL. 720'-0" SCALE : 1/8” = 1’-0” GENERAL NOTE ALL DRAWINGS ARE A REPRESENTATION OF ACTUAL CONDITIONS BASED ON 1952 CONSTRUCTION PLAN DRAWINGS. CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS, SIZES, AND LOCATIONS OF ALL RELEVANT ITEMS. GENERAL NOTE NO. 1 A THIS NOTE APPLIES TO DRAWINGS FT01 THROUGH FT28 THE WORK ARE FOR ALL CONCRETE SURFACES THAT ARE REPAIRED, INFILLED OR PATCHED SHALL BE SMOOTH AND FLUSH WITH SURROUNDING CONCRETE SURFACES. IF NECESSARY THE CONTRACTOR SHALL GRIND THE NEW SURFACES TO BE FLUSH WITH THE ADJOINING SURFACES. WATER TREATMENT PLANT REHABILITATION PHASE |, SEGMENT 4 FILTER REHABILITATION NEW FILTER PLAN — EL. 720°-0” FILTER NO. 6 FILTER NO. 5 FILTER NO. 4 CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLETE ALL EFFLUENT PIPING TO WEST OF SPOOL PIECE AND SUCCESSFULLY PRESSURE TEST IN PRESENCE OF ENGINEER PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF THIS NORTH EFFLUENT SPOOL PIECE. FILTER NO. 2 7-0" 30” WASH WATER DRAIN € 30” WASH WATER DRAIN © 30” WASH WATER DRAIN ¢ E| G 30” MANWAY LE |_¢ 30” MANWAY ¢ 30” MANWAY_[E. ¢ 30” MANWAY CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLETE ALL EFFLUENT PIPING TO WEST OF SPOOL PIECE AND SUCCESSFULLY PRESSURE TEST IN PRESENCE OF ENGINEER PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF THIS SOUTH EFFLUENT SPOOL PIECE. ¢ 30” WASH WATER DRAIN 30” WASH WATER DRAIN a | lo} (TYP.) FILTER NO. 3 FILTER NO. 1 PIPE END CONFIGURATION LEGEND | FLANGE I GROOVED END COUPLING H SLEEVE TYPE COUPLING RELOCATED SUMP PUMP RELOCATE PUMP DISCHARGE TO TIE INTO EXISTING DISCHARGE PIPING. FILTER WALL : T/ FLOOR EL. 720'-9"~ | RELOCATED 4| | SUMP PUMP | PIPING } T/FLOOR EL. 713'-6" GENERAL CONSTRUCTION NOTE NO MOUNTING OR FASTENING OF ANY TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT EQUIPMENT, SUPPORTS, OR DEVICES SECTION SCALE : 1/4” = 1-0” FTO8|FTO8& TO THE CONCRETE OF THE FILTER BOXES OR INFLUENT CHANNEL IS PERMITTED. REVISION fcHK'D. = CAP. C.A.P. ADDENDUM NO. 1 REVISION | 10/03) APPRV’D C.A.P. DATE JUNE 2002 PROJECT NUMBER P>D>PDDP Ia G 30” WASH WATER DRAIN WASH WATER VALVE. INDICATION PANEL (03) 20” X 16” REDUCER FLOOR ELEV. 709’—0” ~~ FT08 | FTI3 FTO9 FT10 eel RELOCATED 6” ROOF DRAIN <== 36” WASH WATER DRAIN GDP eel penenenrnnanarnnmnnnnn Hf 2 <= 48” EFFLUENT 48” EFFLUENT TO RESERVOIR NO. 4 k->_ 36” WASH WATER DRAIN TO STORM SEWER (FUTURE RESIDUALS HANDLING) NOTES : 1, FILTER INTERNALS NOT SHOWN FOR CLARITY. 2. SUPPORT MECHANISMS FOR VALVES, ACTUATORS, & PIPING NOT SHOWN FOR CLARITY. REFER TO 1/4 SCALE SECTIONS FOR SUPPORT LOCATIONS. . HANDRAIL NOT SHOWN FOR CLARITY. SEE NEW FILTER GALLERY SECTION FOR NEW HANDRAIL AT FLOOR ELEV. 718'~ AT TOP OF 36” WASH WATER DRAIN CONCRETE ENCASEMENT. Ww \ WASHWATER TRANSFER] . ) SHEET OF DRAWING NUMBER FTO8 xxxEND_PAGE:deq16_b5_0892_4900_0960 FILTER NO. 7 FILTER NO. 9 FILTER NO. 11 LA ha -————_———__ FIGURE 52 PLATE FOR 1 1/4” DIA. ROD ae CS N aes i. a FOR 1 1/4” DIA. ROD N ” WITH (4) 5/8” DIA. EXPANSION BOLTS AND 4” AIR RELEASE/VACUUM VALVE WITH (4) 5/8” DIA. EXPANSION BOLTS AND 4” AIR RELEASE/VACUUM VALVE FILTER FILTER HOSE® FILTER ‘ALVI N WITH DRAIN PIPING TO EL. 718-6” CONSOLE GRINNELL STEEL ADJUSTABLE CLEVIS HANGER, CONSOLE BIB io 2” PROCESS WATER CONSOLE WITH DRAIN PIPING TO EL. 718-6 N GRINNELL STEEL ADJUSTABLE CLEVIS HANGER, SEE PIPE RESTRAINT DETAIL 1 FIGURE 260. TYPICAL 20” WASH WATER LINE. SHEET FT23. 2” PROCESS N WATER N ram pa i ¢ 10"] SOUTH WASH | AIR 733 i—-| aap oF iu Eva GE 2” BALL VALVE / 1 1/2" FIREHOSE | GRINNELL CONCRETE ROD ATTACHMENT {CONNECTION GRINNELL CONCRETE ROD ATTACHMENT N FIGURE 260. TYPICAL 24” WASH WATER LINE. (6” ABOVE CENTER WALKWAY) WITH LINK SEAL Wl YY (6” ABOVE CENTER WALKWAY) HANDRAIL NOT SHOWN 2” PROCESS WATER 2” PROCESS WATER € ss 2” PROCESS WATER TO FIREHOSE CONNECTION AT FILTER NO. 10 " Oe ii : Lomo {fe-o] so" 20" zlo_ I l a a ae a | \ u u | {}—————__{}_ —_____]]} SSssper7 ff J] fp ff] fi ssp tp} ——_ BSsyy*7#_ 1! [_—__- 4 NOTE : SANITARY SEWER TO oe ® ~~ 1g" ; ‘ ji i i sue BE RELOCATED IN SEGMENT 3 —— — (TYP. OF 2 LOCATIONS) 2-0" PIPE WITH TYPE 1 GRINNEL WEST WASH WATER SUPPLY PIPE SADDLE SUPPORT PLATFORM EL. 725°—0" AT WASH AIR VALVE @2 . REMOVE PIPE HANGERS AT VALVE @02) AS NECESSARY PE Sn PROVIDE 3” DIA. SCH. 40 24” BLIND FLANGE WITH 4” FLANGE, RELOCATED VALVE G4 AND DRAIN LINE V1 HANDRAIL NOT SHOWN MA T C H PIPE SADDLE EAST-WEST 5. ni ! CENTERLINE SHALL MATCH 2-0 MAINTAIN 3° PIPING FROM FILTER CLASSIFICATION AREA TO 36” WASH Zod WATER DRAIN CONCRETE. ENCASEMEN THAT OF ADJACENT COLUMN C-S9. = 4 === a iC ast ; © 5 ei ~ 5 sig! < —6"~ 5 < —6"~ 5 < = 5 Yn =< Yn SADDLE (TYP. = Yn = z = Ele 2/5 EE =| = = SEE DETAL. bile 2/5 EE =| = = ti 25 E =| GENERAL NOTE NO. 1 % ale s |o ® s |< 2 ale =e |e 2 2 l< a ate s |e . es l< ¢ OF WATER PLANT id . lie BIg = le 8 5 al BIE = “lp _ - i RIE 2 ele THIS NOTE APPLIES TO DRAWINGS FTO1 r a a THROUGH FT28 PIPE SADDLE EAST-WEST PIPE SADDLE EAST-WEST THE WORK ARE FOR ALL CONCRETE SURFACES THAT PIPE END CONFIGURATION LEGEND PIPE STAND LEGEND oe hae SECTION - WEST ee ARE REPAIRED, INFILLED OR PATCHED SHALL BE SMOOTH COLUMN C-S7. SCALE : 1/4" = 1’-O" FTO8/FT13 COLUMN C-S5. AND FLUSH WITH SURROUNDING CONCRETE SURFACES. IF NECESSARY THE CONTRACTOR SHALL GRIND THE NEW TYPE 1 GRINNEL ADJUSTABLE PIPE SADDLE SUPPORT FIG. 264 FTO9 SURFACES TO BE FLUSH WITH THE ADJOINING SURFACES. FT10 | GROOVED END COUPLING TYPE 2 — GRINNEL ADJUSTABLE PIPE SUPPORT FIGURE 264 MODIFIED TO SUPPORT VALVE FILTER NO. 1 FILTER NO. 3 FILTER NO. H SLEEVE TYPE COUPLING TYPE 3° GRINNEL ADJUSTABLE PIPE STANCHION FIG. 62 GRINNELL CONCRETE ROD ATTACHMENT FIGURE 52 PLATE FOR 1 1/4” DIA. ROD es WITH (4) 5/8” DIA. EXPANSION BOLTS AND GRINNELL STEEL ADJUSTABLE CLEVIS HANGER, FILTER FIGURE 260. TYPICAL 24” WASH WATER LINE. CONSOLE ch J o 7 _ ae. ] I | 7 —= I I _- FE 10" SOUTH WASH AIR 733'-8"<=> = — @ 10" SOUTH WASH AIR 733-8" <=> —H IW OES PROPOSED (P) (A @ _S- PIPE HANGER, TYPICAL 2” POTABLE WATER 3/4” PROCESS WATER TO H.B. AT C—S14 lu SPX2" & 3” HOT WATER 2” POTABLE WATER 3] . @ a ee Cy 2” POTABLE WATER 6” PROCESS WATER = CO 6” PROCESS WATER OD) 6" PROCESS WATER CT 4° O.D. INSULATED CONDENSATE RETURN —, 6” 4” 0.D. INSU CONDENSATE RETURN = 9*_§” 3'-6" 10'-6" — @ 9" 0.D. INSULATED CONDENSATE RETURN 4" O.D. INSULATED CONDENSATE RETURN 6” BLIND FLANGE WITH 3” THREADED TAP FOR GONDENSATE| 3” COPPER WATER LINE RETURN PUMP aig MATCH 36” X 30” K ECCENTRIC § REDUCER XK CONCRETE SADDLE (TYP.) SEE DETAIL. a ce ee PIPE SADDLE EAST-WEST z. = > z. = Po a CONCRETE PIPE . CENTERLINE SHALL MATCH Po z 3 x =. z 3 x 5, we a z PIER, TYP. SEE 3) THAT OF ADJACENT COLUMN, = als B Zz Gl= a Zz 5 = §|Z ETAL DWG F123. =] C-st6. B z 3/5 af = = 3/5 al = = Ze i |S al = = ¢ OF WATER PLANT le lz ® 8 |B lz ® e |= ‘e le Rlz ® 8 oS ols o! ol oS ols o! oI ele ol ol Z ols oI o GENERAL CONSTRUCTION NOTE GENERAL NOTE CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLETE ALL SECTI ON EAST EFFLUENT PIPING TO WEST OF SPOOL PIECE AND SUCCESSFULLY PRESSURE Foe NO MOUNTING OR FASTENING OF ANY TEMPORARY ALL DRAWINGS ARE A REPRESENTATION OF ACTUAL SCALE : 1/4" = 1-0 / FTO8/FT13 aN nie Ge LS OR PERMANENT EQUIPMENT, SUPPORTS, OR DEVICES CONDITIONS BASED ON 1952 CONSTRUCTION PLAN FTO9 SOUTH EFFLUENT SPOOL PIECE. TO THE CONCRETE OF THE FILTER BOXES OR INFLUENT DRAWINGS. CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY ALL FT10 CHANNEL IS PERMITTED. DIMENSIONS, SIZES, AND LOCATIONS OF ALL RELEVANT ITEMS. MICHIGAN REVISION SHEET WATER TREATMENT PLANT REHABILITATION PHASE I, SEGMENT 4 oF CITY OF FLINT eee eee ct eae tes DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS & UTILITIES 1425 KEYSTONE AVE., LANSING, MI 48911 TELE. (517) 393-6800 + FAX (517) 272-7390 DATE JUNE 2002 PROJECT NUMBER DRAWING NUMBER F113 FILTER REHABILITATION NEW FILTER GALLERY SECTIONS ~ ile fT {| | lelsle| alo|o SS i aleym a xxxEND_PAGE:deq16_b5_0892_4900_0961 1 tt u wee j— —— — —_ — -_---—— ---_—- -Gi- -_---—— -_---—— -_---—— -_---—— [(— — ——s --—— —s — os —l Yu | pe a oP PSP OP iu GPP OS | 4P wll | 7% “ey ® | ° it Le | | af a iT OZON 3LDG ta y IS / SS yf ! SI | 4a th WH PLANT NO. 1 i aie alll a (ABANDONED) | Tl | " # \| 5 - 727.21, x | 3 Wy — Ye = —_ CHLORINE CONTACT - 4ST . q 16 | i [| : 4 1a / _ if f | 5 8 Wy ZZ SDE Ls SRR aR NK N = ~ _ N = = Tae, ac ‘ a i a || ee cc dlc (lr hid ~~ | | | | ~N 1 | tt J ~ 1d My ! ss. | | a $ | \ ~ Ri ~~ | 3 | Ho PIN : oO we L a S an = I> s / boi 2" Wake cg, 8 ; I Sa Curr Nn Fe 1 | eg ae ro ST \ | - St poté \ \ 1 yd 7 ee / NS ) I | 4 ff yr lot “|e / na cael | _— _— cs / Fi NY Id ~Ly 7 OQ, 7x (oi SO. —_ a f/f St! ~J LOL 7s | f# SATS 48" RAW WATER LOW SERVICE 7 // SASS Li DDT TT TTT IIIT TIT IIIIL Le SOA HVT / Li SD 8 PAW WATER LOW SERVICE __ f/f SQYA 720.31 . wet / Ze Ofor or = : BY Sf . N / Tig NY . SS \W 6) / R ee Sv / G \ \ MH #8 \ / RIM = 725.08 _ 24” OD CT_WATER. xxxEND_PAGE:deq16_b5_0892_4900_0962 EZ CONTAS, INLET CHAMBER . Ola RE £6 7 oN wy OF = cy ae “<! (STs G ~ Tee! a, Vo ly : We 3 tof eK if 2 fe shaded: NORRIS: & MAY’ G JENGINEERS | xxxEND_PAGE:deq16_b5_0892_4900_0963 MICHIGAN. “GITY OF FLINT 28.5 r Chlorine Stero ge. iver) Alan ea Nua ree s re Seterde. Jo) Lite fon rvorking Line &% a gq Stat 7 un win é sf e Storage ern rheadg 4 Ove bb WS EL 725.5. ra~4E” Row f INES wee qe gee cee tor Room We : Chlor wo 4 v SEW working Line. gh Lift AY 7 As ra ff Pump : Room. i L Gus SSseaes 4 wy Z, rate Ee Fah ry Ens Tas nh, 9 Sui: tech Gear R fe + borking | Line ena /St aE fee/ Bear. Supports. ” Rad sce “ “8 é 9 working Lin MES. ae 4 ‘ Re ‘Servo olumirs extend \ 12 Solid earth, By er eae? co High Service. Pipe ure Piping | . 4 Opace for ° Fut ’ Working Lin “NN ~ & z rs ee ny Pa YN SS v as B40F° gompre us Chiorine Of, “Onder anoth® Cenly 3 eae i FECTION Ce 3 J 7% ufure H. EL FOnGO At Ft igh Lift Pumps | i Eh, Vite lei sts neowsly aie ccd cone rele cf 2 xxxEND_PAGE:deq16_b5_0892_4900_0964 26 rae 7S sacl Yieg, I 42" Sfee/ Line . PUMP SYSTIon . ¢ : Og NA ; : ae 7 iP , r 48. Beiimoetty 42°RAB Red Elbow te i : ‘ a RCN Sh ey ‘ ; | 5 ge Sy bt GEE Bevtiouthy BS Me cok _ oo ! a Sb as ‘ MS a's < wad! 2Ballmovth FR, 36" BellAaeoth “% ii : _ 30"% 36” - ge'%a2" Qed Elbow +N a \ * J0"" 86"Rechucing Elbow 30% 36" ‘sheer Pealicar. 30% 42 ” Stee/ Reducer ‘a ‘Skee/ Redus er ; : i a "Re 4 bo : qa gq. i if LE), 709.50 ¢ EL 109,50 €E/ 709.50 x#2 Ree, £/ awl eed: | 20° SP wall L. lead. Joints Leay Jf & EL JOR 28 42" Steal Lead Sant. - ole . ars . 30" 84 hOl/ Slee St Wall 3; ait kat ° 7 “e [30 Steel Seve. | Bo" AD. £ & 70% 50 aa 4 he Veeve 80", rl weere fead iat a fat Seve» é Ef yoalesd ial! S/eeve |- GO 24" Ecce, Reducer|. 1 36%30" Eee. Real lop, 12 ee 30" Valve: ‘i UM PS t gous" Reducer ; “dad 30%20" Res 4 Se FI 2-48 RC.Lines | \ to Chloriagé : ontrack ° TRANSFER, : xxxEND_PAGE:deq16_b5_0892_4900_0965 Operating Mesh # of Cone Volve Operatiig Mesh one Vaive | 30°88" Rex f SA worl Pree | i - bo Wall place fe e ss J (EL 74 594) \ I pt Voint Pipey fe : all £ of Cone Valve i 15 MGD oa ; a. MigH LIFT & of Cone alve — We a Low Lier nee Po) Pump Sucrion Sperading Mech, » a ae FUP SUETIon < z . +. UETION (30" 36 Reducing Eibor. | - "| 36%42" Red. ethene, SSN: ANS RES | £El 71000 a) -. L€A 70883 Kae Hage ee ia fp: ae BO. q ‘ peo . “s 4 ! “be ‘ ma - . ~~ . f . ; a ee O ee | ¢ ye 80 bce, Log! L apoa) | «| L_£h 127009 | yn | i 30°20" Bec, Bed-— > ) ami Fe : f ant _ 3018" Ler af ae _ | ¢ 56° St Wall Sleeve. oy x" * ; Le, | i 5-944 Dowels NS AG Gowels El. 704.009 . arobeate exe ot fee gta ae ea Recssel eas 8 te oN ee sanieanmennci a sg te cic seman ss pendben pbeee font os een nee emt — 1s i a Rey & % 5 t ; ¢ o ; o a oy dows! fs. cone nent coe ae eta enn _ Wess . ‘ 42° R.2, fppe. Poor Seercgn. ALA, (s 15, } Secrion E-€ wall with pipe | POU AGE oe ee Pd? mr an re Sfee/ Tange. 4 (SHowi WG - LEE 7D Pune) ee Malolos vei GE as Soules fits" ; _ , 8 | eo HILgH SE “£ of Comes Vi att “war in7 IEEE Pipe GAlLcerr / MB” Sh Kein. “w 42: 42028 Tee. _ 2 qQ A. 42°36 Etc. Reducer?” : ‘ Bednocth ‘ rer Tit “96 '*50" Eee. ben ~ ) 30'*29% Fear, Lea’ 7? | { | i} i} | \ 42:30" Reducer ; aot ey ies lye z “te : ; 6 aad Heere. he ide : i ae ¥ 5 AEE CL 4 . ‘ O- 74" P Dewels -- iz eS os 704. caer __ 8 : een serene | a ve Shoal Lf: faye Cor we led pon pf ali pes * VPHOA ING oM “MGD # utp oie (VHGA EAE G whip) eh 717, 253 \ Sew es 4 M8 oft Moar . ¥ él. . “£ of Cone Valve ~ . . . ; Seale: Sito” \ fg Operating Mech, Low Lier | _. : . Bi" Db Kian , ; Putrae SUCTION | Nr . ye Weil E/b ; gil" meee Core Z . . OW me bo ” POLE j i eee Ae eR RR ER minh AA pe Ree . “4 | Flare an Z Cell. “s fra" y a \ ZI*P4 | f i > iy : 7 i Requrer uf 36°"30 Eco. Reduce» r L Fe cin SHE ES rt a ‘I {| AR! 3 reg rt,“ wah re G0. Flare I S 36" if a a | he ao " St Wall Sleeve Q iB bolt ¢ inserll ~ | cect F : es MY ve Qecriow C-C 7 +8" (SHowing €0 GD Do Pour) Scafle:¢ qZzlo" (noms 5 i on tae LIS CHARGE ) Saale s ‘Z Ss flo” we of Corres | Valve gp “per aring Mech, yt f Come VOolve i Operating Mec h, 30” S4 Wait Sleeve Low L(ET (36 42" Red. Elbaw a, 36°30" Ecce. a : iy BIB Bed. Sellen uth 7 - a - "8 dowels he, * 36" St Wall svee$ | oy SECTION D-D - a rnin 28 4ED SECTION H- Af ng Pe. (SrHoming 5/4 #2 Pune) (Sowing ZO SIG D Pomp Lise CHAR ga) Series tio , - , / rn cr Seale f tro” “ 1 “OITY OF FLINT, MICHIGAN. | ra , WATER TREATMENT PLANT — PUMPING STATION NOS Wore: AKA Denorves Forture Biogen Lier Funnps ¢ FIrPés. (2. Soction piping for Wee “hier Peng a /S a8 shown 10 “Shee LOE | Manu “Spent ‘Bese Wee are | se L S) NO RIS. & MA Feo, 49iRejocate H Lift J Pumps Vibe. _ pes EWl R HAY : rte JAN. 44 ‘Re locate, Lit} Valves: Wade. fe CONSULTING ENGINEERS ff BEV IZ DEC. a3/" Complete Details : “ated | : ANN, ARBOR,. MICHIGAN ©’ e 4 . ae *s wt Be a, a‘ we i re fap" a ie eee ee eee os REV LL Joel we issue © Bae os ee + xxxEND_PAGE:deq16_b5_0892_4900_0966 ry 13S ogi a Pa aR RE, ae & TATION : de} Filtered Water fype~ <t. _ . : 2 wd ler Lupe $ a Lower tar” siaies te ~? FBiacp gan *"y | Ee pet rales vant. : ‘ : ah. f te i ay in, BE VEGAS 5 : oe. Ly ; | ' wo ; CONTROL: CHAIGGER rE & sie “rth {rare F poveaen? A sen ta bea th To : “a'Reservoir Transfer Line 4 aE Moen 08. LINE We Wc tee mt Ot 7 , i Sf t ee: £ of Reservoir 2K Ie cock ft he ti . ¥ : Bhs ef Pi ee : ; 1 . : E i TOTS a Ae F- “4 ben 810" 0” conan ore val LOD OPEL ect semen a) Oo eae roe Oar ty Sete F we Koos 7? Se Pp Oo 0 xO lnm, cen eemenu shee diemcameibsiepe Ase i E ‘i “ 2 pre fe Loree iy, S, : po : 2 4 a aad . a fa. fe ebro wana | | 7” 0 eggtg wlmepotg”. Hef we ago al me L/L 729,00. PUMPING STATION {a “ E,709.00~ LBS TEE TESTE = ee ae J , hoes, : : ae ; = en Ota te anh ‘ Fy 709. @ “ at : 3 gees ow: pare ~ , 471 707. 00° “oIty OF FLINT, “MICHIGAN xxxEND_PAGE:deq16_b5_0892_4900_0967 ee ass asp Beg ee ores Ante, ee eg . al ? ring remy ~~ Oo one ry _ Elev 72200 £ ? —— — 2 ae bas shown, 4. directions, ea side| of walt - C i ae = {-6" Fille? with ‘ 1-6, </-6" jpillet ph : ae : Cog TP ge Ber S peek ; | Be ee oer betweer) z "Pog. side of woll PRL TIEG OG 9 Se ween “supports <2 Normal. rook: reint shown, . ct : ie PP ; ; : LES 72d.8* } -. 2 Drop ponels af ail supports : _—_ EG 2 oe ‘Mor mal roof reinf shawn. SREY \% $ @ 72" gf Supports, st ore roentical— See Typical SUPPUFS. 2. Drop panets ofall supports a — wall Sectron. ; : wall” Sec#lor. are identical~ See Jypical , i ok ee Hh, small i | Lis : Z¢ OQ co, face. AOMCTIOM WELL. ° ZC 7 eo. face. TROPVS FER. CHAMBER ee an a a ei Joteel point rings ta tif (ae ends AZ” rank COM. pipe. A NN 4B BO. Reservoir Transfer ldrie. oN eel 14,54 aoe Pring von x e i Leove out 4 tile 4 “ty ~ dowels locks: as Pipl @ 6! \ 8 ee Woah Vormel Floor. ‘rein Sieaati ge ag Floor Elen: 708,50 “ Bog See Dug “22157 if for Frans, ae | Eley, TOPOO\-- | ~ af ee Ong "22159, for this Area, 2) bese with leon Conc. . os ‘ ( Seeyonac. ELevarion. . LET Ate. 4z" ‘RC, TRANSEER CINE, RVR. WALL. Watt Si SECTION 4 AT or TRANsreR nu CuanoeR. Seale: Bere Scale: £4 Bre” Watt Section East oF JRANSEER, CHAMBER Seole: % Sito" COMCBETE Cofté foe ALEOING, See. 3” ica Lotion Be: Ua OH eariage Zz. 2isé “SHAS. Secrionas Luan A. “A Rook Elev..varies- fron, 726.00 to. 726. 50. , a orner be t 1 Borsa} roof rein€ shown, - _ é ca - a : Nore: P58 md 16 FB" Fit h ee a°® oe ; ‘ae Ble 7 ... Aermal walt = B46 led with $8 Ole” bors between supports, - eink shown: % 46 ee" ‘ot: supports. Coat this end of # with a . Treat For eeiens: L¢ 6 + — 6s xB ” S5tee/ Be ee stop Scolé:F S/o i fs 1 rf Trercal, CRoss Secro : For. ‘etotion ae Aire Bt Coawels ©B” oo - 8 Cath’ face.} Nore: / yshing — ag Col. Spiral, Mormat: fioor reinf. Shown. “i lon th (OF Spiral 16, -la 1s bon: ; NS 9 ms . ‘With Cot" Spee 8e/" “ps 640 i +16 ~ % “po YFloor Elen 4 vores > ° .Froln 708. o Fo. POD Ge Floor Elev voriés

Flint OEL - MDEQ Comments

Jeff, In looking at some of the Flint TTHM material for tomorrow’s TAC meeting.....| noted our March 1, 2015 comments pertaining to the most recent Operation Evaluation Report prepared for Flint. | didn’t see an electronic “sent date” to you on this document. It may be that | hand delivered our comments to LAN during our first TAC meeting on March 4". |f not, attached are our comments and | apologize in the delay. These comments can be addressed in the next report due on May 29, 2015. Michael Prysby, P.E. District Engineer Office of Drinking Water and Municipal Assistance 517 290-8817 xxxEND_PAGE:deq16_b5_0892_4900_3617 City of Flint Operational Evaluation Report March 1, 2015 MDEQ Comments Revise Tables 2 and 3 on Page 7 to account for proper alignment of DDBP samples (results, location, site code). Also, revise statement on Page 1 regarding the number of sites exceeding the TTHM MCL following the 4" quarter sample cycle. . The ozone system was recently repaired. (Page 10 & 19). What is the ozone system’s current production rate? . The city’s hydraulic model (prepared by Potter Consulting) is being updated (Page 16). Is the model currently sufficient in determining proper sizing for the transmission main replacement in DuPont & Bishop Street corridor? (currently sized at 24-inch) (Pages 5, 16, and 20) . Are the potassium permanganate results & conclusions available? (Pages 4 and 17) . We agree that some reduction in storage volume could be achieved without compromising reliability; however given high usage, main breaks, and “let runs” during the winter, storage volume remains important. We agree with the need to determine adequate storage volume which will likely differ between summer and winter. (Page 15) We agree with the concern of re-circulation of water pumped from the booster pump stations; however, we were recently informed of existing distribution system check valves to prevent recirculation. These appurtenances and their condition need to be confirmed. The hydraulic model may also need to be updated to include these valves. (Page 15) . We concur with the recommendation to provide the ability to monitor raw water TOC and PTAP TTHM. (Pages 17 & 18) Page 20 provides 2 options to manage water age and each option includes reducing the utilized storage volume of the 3 MGAL well to 2 MGAL. The reduction in storage volume limits the WTP’s ability to meet CT under worst case conditions (low temp, high pH, 30 MGD pumping rate from reservoir). . Table 11 on Page 21 outlines an Action Plan for Stage 1 and Stage 2 actions. Several actions listed in Stage 2 including; repair of ozone system, continued valve replacement, and replacement of deteriorated watermains are longer term solutions; however, they need to proceed regardless of the outcome of TTHM reduction. xxxEND_PAGE:deq16_b5_0892_4900_3618 xxxEND_PAGE:deq16_b5_0892_4900_3619

Flint

Hi Mike, | have a couple questions that | think you can easily answer: 1. Flint needs 0.5 log inactivation by disinfection after treatment, right? 2. For the replacement of anthracite with GAC, is there a minimum EBCT you will want to see? Thanks, Jeffrey R. Hansen Senior Project Manager CONFIDENTIALITY AND PRIVILEGE NOTICE: This email communication, including any and all attachments, (collectively, this “Communication”), is intended solely for the person(s) to whom it is addressed. This Communication may contain information that is privileged, confidential and/or proprietary. Any unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this Communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this Communication in error, please contact the sender immediately and destroy any and all copies of this Communication. xxxEND_PAGE:deq16_b5_0892_4900_0949

Flint Lab Results

Hi Mike, Do you know if the DEQ lab has gotten Flint THM / HAAS results yet? Flint has not seen anything yet but they said you normally see the results before they do. Jeffrey R. Hansen Senior Project Manager Lockwood, Andrews &Newnam, inc. ce ak Sa se 1311 South Linden Rc int, MI 48532 T 810.820.2682 C way ° OR xxxEND_PAGE:deq16_b5_0892_4900_0856

THM Violation

Mike, You told me that when a community had a full year of samples, the full year average is used as the OEV, but | don’t see that in the guidance document anywhere. The EPA guidance document seems to say that the OEV is always calculated using 3 quarts of data, with the current quarter counted twice. See attached. Am | missing something? Jeffrey R. Hansen Senior Project Manager Lockwood, Andrews & Newnam, Inc. A LEO A DALY COMPANY 1311 South Linden Road, Suite Be Flint, MI 48532 T 810.820.2682 € 810.333.3201 www.lan-inc.com + [email protected] CONFIDENTIALITY AND PRIVILEGE NOTICE his email communication, including any and all attachments, (collectively, this Communication }, is intended solely for the person(s) to whom it is addressed. This Communication may contain information that is privileged, confidential and/or proprietary. Any unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this Communication is strictly prohibited. ff you have received this Communication in error, please contact the sender immediately and destroy any and all copies of this Communication. xxxEND_PAGE:deq02_b217_2888_3366_277 1. Introduction This chapter covers: Purpose and Scope Who Must Comply with the Operational Evaluation Requirements of the Stage 2 DBPR? What Is an Operational Evaluation Level Exceedance? What Are the Requirements If the Operational Evaluation Level Is Exceeded? When Do the Operational Evaluation Requirements Take Effect? Organization of this Guidance Manual Additional Resources The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) promulgated the Stage 2 Disinfectants and Disinfection ByProducts Rule (DBPR) in January 2006. The Stage 2 DBPR provides for increased protection against the potential risks for cancer and reproductive and developmental health effects associated with disinfection byproducts (DBP). The Stage 2 DBPR establishes maximum contaminant level goals for chloroform, monochloroacetic acid and trichloroacetic acid; maximum contaminant levels (MCLs), based on a locational running annual average (LRAA)’, for total trihalomethanes (TTHM) and haloacetic acids (HAA5); monitoring, reporting, and public notification requirements based on the TTHM and HAAS MCLs; and revisions to the reduced monitoring requirements for bromate. The complete Stage 2 DBPR can be found at The Stage 2 DBPR also establishes operational evaluation requirements that are initiated by the TTHM and HAAS levels found during Stage 2 DBPR compliance monitoring. Compliance with Stage 2 DBPR MCLs is based on the average of four individual quarterly DBP measurements collected at a given location (i.e., LRAA). However, a system that is in compliance with the Stage 2 DBPR MCLs, based on the LRAA, at a location may still have individual (i.e., not averaged) DPB measurements at that location that exceed the Stage 2 DBPR MCLs. EPA and the Stage 2 Microbial/Disinfection Byproducts (M/DBP) Advisory Committee were concerned about these higher levels of DBPs. The Stage 2 DBBR operational evaluation requirements were established to address these concerns. , The Stage DBPR requires systems to conduct operational evaluations, initiated by the operational evaluation levels (OEL) found in Stage 2 DBPR compliance monitoring, and to submit an operational evaluation report to the State. The OELs are determined with an algorithm, described later in this section, based on Stage 2 monitoring results, The OELs initiate a comprehensive review of system operations and act as an early warning for a possible Stage 2 DBPR violation in the following quarter. This early warning allows systems to act to prevent the violation. The Stage DBPR process for initiating an operational evaluation is not based on health effects information. The operational evaluation requirements of the Stage 2 DBPR are ' The Stage 2 DBPR requires systems to meet an LRAA of 0.080 mg/L for TTHM and 0.060 mg/L for HAAS at each compliance monitoring location (40 CFR 141.620 (d)). Operational Evaluation Guidance Manual 1-1 December 2008 xxxEND_PAGE:deq02_b217_2888_3366_278 intended as an indicator of operational performance and to allow systems to take proactive steps to remain in compliance with the Stage 2 DBPR MCLs. 1.1 Purpose and Scope EPA has developed this manual to provide guidance to water systems on identifying TTHM and HAAS peaks and conducting operational evaluations to determine the cause(s) of and reduce such peaks, and to assist States in implementing the Stage 2 operational evaluation requirements and in reviewing operational evaluation reports. The specific objectives of this manual are to: ¢ Describe an OEL exceedance. e Summarize regulatory requirements for addressing an OEL exceedance. e Provide guidance for documenting and reporting an OEL exceedance. e Provide a methodology for identifying the cause of an OEL exceedance. e Present options available to reduce TTHM and HAAS concentrations in the distribution system to minimize a future OEL exceedance. The options presented to reduce TTHM and HAAS concentrations in the distribution system to minimize future OEL exceedances are intended to assist systems in meeting their operational evaluation requirements and to assist States in reviewing operational evaluation reports. An OEL exceedance requires an operational evaluation meeting specific criteria and reporting of the evaluation to the State, but does not require systems to take corrective actions. The operational evaluation and report will provide valuable information to both the system and the State. This guidance manual focuses on common surface and ground water and treatment processes that affect formation of TTHM and HAAS. References are provided throughout the document to help you optimize other treatment processes. You should also consider contacting your State to discuss your particular system needs and concerns, 1.2. Who Must Comply with the Operational Evaluation Requirements of the Stage 2 DBPR? All community water and non-transient non-community water systems that use a primary or residual disinfectant other than ultraviolet light (UV), or that deliver water that has been treated with a primary or residual disinfectant other than UV, must comply with the Stage 2 DBPR MCLs for TTHM and HAAS and the Stage 2 DBPR operational evaluation requirements. This includes consecutive systems delivering water that has been treated with a primary or residual disinfectant other than UV. If you are one of these systems, you must comply with the operational evaluation requirements of the Stage 2 DBPR if you meet both of the following criteria: 1) You are required to conduct compliance monitoring for the Stage 2 DBPR; and Operational Evaluation Guidance Manual 1-2 December 2008 xxxEND_PAGE:deq02_b217_2888_3366_279 2) You collect Stage 2 DBPR compliance samples quarterly. If you are on annual monitoring, you are not subject to the operational evaluation requirements of the Stage 2 DBPR. Ifyou are required to increase Stage 2 monitoring to quarterly (§141.625), you are also required to meet the operational evaluation requirements. 13 What Is an Operational Evaluation Level Exceedance? The Stage 2 DBPR states that a system exceeds the OEL if one of the following occurs at any compliance monitoring location (40 CFR 141.626(a)): e¢ TTHM compliance monitoring results for the two previous quarters plus two times the TTHM result for the current quarter, divided by 4, exceeds 0.080 milligrams per liter (mg/L); or e¢ HAAS compliance monitoring results for the two previous quarters plus two times the HAAS result for the current quarter, divided by 4, exceeds 0.060 mg/L. You can use the formula below to determine if you have an OEL exceedance. Example {.1 shows how this formula can be used with distribution system TTHM and HAAS data. Formula for Determining if You Have an OEL Exceedance For both TTHM and HAAS and for each compliance monitoring location, calculate the following: (A+B+(2*C))/4=D Where: A= TTHMorHAAS result for the quarter before the previous quarter (mg/L) B= TTHMor HAAS result for the previous quarter (mg/L) C= °TTHM or HAAS result for the current quarter (mg/L) D= __ your Operational Evaluation Value (mg/L) If D for TTHM is > 0.080 mg/L, you have an OEL Exceedance If D for HAAS is > 0.060 mg/L, you have an OEL Exceedance Operational Evaluation Guidance Manual 1-3 December 2008 xxxEND_PAGE:deq02_b217_2888_3366_280 Example 1.1 Determining If There Is an OEL Exceedance A system is conducting Stage 2 compliance monitoring at four locations. TTHM and HAAS data from the previous two quarters (February and May) and the current quarter (August) are presented below. TTHM Data_ . . Operational Stage 2 February May August Evaluation DBPR Value: Location D= es a & (A+B+(2*C))/4 #1 0.065 mg/L 0.074 mg/L 0.087 mg/L 0.078 mg/L #2 0.064 mg/L 0.072 mg/L 0.084 mg/L 0.076 mg/L #3 0.068 mg/L 0.075 mg/L 0.093 mg/L #4 0.066 mg/L 0.070 mg/L 0.082 mg/L 0.075 mg/L HAAS Data Operational Stage 2 February May August Evaluation DBPR Value: Location D= i E c (A#B4(2*C))/4 #1 0.033 mg/L 0.041 mg/L 0.050 mg/L 0.044 mg/L #2 0.042 mg/L 0.048 mg/L 0.055 mg/L 0.050 mg/L #3 0.037 mg/L 0.043 mg/L 0.046 mg/L 0.043 mg/L #4 0.043 mg/L 0.045 mg/L 0.052 mg/L 0.048 mg/L In August, the system exceeds the OEL at location #3 because the TTHM value in column D exceeds the OEL (0.080 mg/L). Operational Evaluation Guidance Manual 1-4 December 2008 xxxEND_PAGE:deq02_b217_2888_3366_281 1.4 What Are the Requirements If the Operational Evaluation Level is Exceeded? If the OEL is exceeded, you must take the following actions (40 CFR 141.626(b)): 1) Conduct an operational evaluation to determine the cause of the exceedance(s). 2) Submit a written report of the evaluation to the State no later than 90 days after being notified of the analytical result that caused the exceedance(s). 3) Keep a copy of the operational evaluation report and make it available to the public upon request. An OEL exceedance /s not a violation of the Stage 2 DBPR. However, failure to submit an evaluation report to the State in the required time frame is a violation and requires Tier 3 public notice (as required by the Public Notification Rule). All Stage 2 DBPR compliance monitoring results must be included in the system’s Consumer Confidence Report (CCR). There are no additional CCR requirements related to an OEL exceedance unless the system is in violation due to failure to complete and submit an evaluation report. The operational evaluation must include an examination of system treatment and distribution operational practices that may contribute to TTHM and HAAS formation including: e Storage tank operations, « Excess storage capacity, e Distribution system flushing, e Sources of supply and source water quality, and ¢ Treatment processes and finished water quality. The operational evaluation must also include what steps could be considered to minimize future exceedances (40 CFR 141.626(b)(2)). The system may request and the State may allow a limited scope of the operational evaluation if the system is able to identify the cause of the OEL exceedance to the State’s satisfaction. The State must then approve the limited scope of the evaluation in writing and the system must keep the written approval with the completed report. Note that submitting this request will not extend the 90 day deadline for submitting the operational evaluation report. Exhibit 1.1 presents a flow chart with the operational evaluation rule requirements. Operational Evaluation Guidance Manual 1-5 December 2008 xxxEND_PAGE:deq02_b217_2888_3366_282 Rennaker, Joanne (DEQ)

Showing 1-25 of 29