Correspondence between

Emails where every selected person appears as a sender, recipient, or copied participant.

RE: Data Warehouse access and Lead data for Flint

Hi Marcy, fagree that it makes sense for Bob to provide the weekly Flint updates to department leadership given that Fintisa very active situation. | would at sore point Hike to see epi re-run the Poisson analysis for Flint with confirmed (venous only} cases. And yes we need to set up another meeting. Rashmi had asked me last week if f was going to do that and EF will. [believe we will need to meet periodically, particularly in light of the Free Press request related to Detroit and other high burden communities. Bob -- thanks for sharing the weekly update. Corinne

RE: Flint Testing and EBLLs.xlsx

Cristin, toan safely say | don’t understand it without same explanation. However, late yesterday Nancy and | decided to take a look two years farther back to see how they fit with the recent years. Please see attached, which i just finished this marning. Sorry / didn’t have this for you yesterday before you did the analysis. Would this new information change the analysis? 2 xxxEND_PAGE:dhhs03_b0833_3004_3007_2 003006 Thariks, Bob

RE: Flint Testing and EBLLs.xlsx

Hi Nancy, imiade a p-chart, which Shewhart’s version of a control chart for nronortions, for the data you sent. Basically, | used the monthly data from 2015-14 to create upper and lower control limits, then plotted the 2014-15 data in arun chart. it shows that the three months in question are the only onas that lie outside the control lirnit: in fect, they are the only points that fle well above the meari at all. This doesn’t say anything about causality, but it does warrant further investigation. There are several next steps we can ernploy if the folks upstairs ask us to look deener inte the data. Alsa, Yr not sure if you talked at all with the Environmanial Health folks, but their tanicologists could probably heto give us sarne context to the issue. Cristin