Correspondence among

Hi Marcy, fagree that it makes sense for Bob to provide the weekly Flint updates to department leadership given that Fintisa very active situation. | would at sore point Hike to see epi re-run the Poisson analysis for Flint with confirmed (venous only} cases. And yes we need to set up another meeting. Rashmi had asked me last week if f was going to do that and EF will. [believe we will need to meet periodically, particularly in light of the Free Press request related to Detroit and other high burden communities. Bob -- thanks for sharing the weekly update. Corinne

VH just add that it may make sense for Bob to compile a weekly update, but for Patti to run any analysis on the data file? Not sure - wa haven’t delved inta that territory yet... do we need to sat up another meeting/conversation?

Okay, thanks, Bob. Hf incorporate the previous years and put the new results into a publisher document with some description of what’s going on in the chart. We'll find out ff this changes the results!

Cristin, toan safely say | don’t understand it without same explanation. However, late yesterday Nancy and | decided to take a look two years farther back to see how they fit with the recent years. Please see attached, which i just finished this marning. Sorry / didn’t have this for you yesterday before you did the analysis. Would this new information change the analysis? 2 xxxEND_PAGE:dhhs03_b0833_3004_3007_2 003006 Thariks, Bob

xxxEND_PAGE:dhhs02_b0237_0797_0885_16 000813 Okay, thanks, Bob. I'll incorporate the previous years and put the new results into a publisher document with some description of what's going on in the chart. We'll find out if this changes the results!