You are correct that lead level results in the file you received are
rounded (i.2., no decirnal places}. The data set we are using in
epidemiology (which is the sare type of file Mr. Scott would have
xxxEND_PAGE:dhhs02_b1012_3602_3604_1
003603
pulled from the data warehouse for you) contains values from 4 to
49. Ara you seeing the 10 and above levels?
ido not know the rounding rules for the lead result data and am still
working on getting you that information.
Follow Up Flag: Flag for follow up
Flag Status: Completed
Dr. Hanna-Attisha,
| got your email and am working on an answer for you.
Sarah
Sarah Lyon-Callo, MA, MS
Director, Lifecourse Epidemiology and Genomics Division
Bureau of Disease Control, Prevention and Epidemiology
Population Health and Commmunity Services Administration
Michigan Department of Health and Human Services
201 Townsend St., 4" Floor Capitol View Building
PO Box 30195
Lansing, MI 48909
PH: 517-335-9315
This message, including any attachments, is intended solely for the use of the named recipient(s) and may contain
confidential and/or privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, or distribution of any confidential
and/or privileged information contained in this e-mail is expressly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient,
please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy any and all copies of the original message.
Please note: Michigan has a public records law. Mast written cornmunicatians to or from state officials regarding state
business are public records available ta the public and media upon request. Your e-mail communications and any
attachments to therm may be subject te public disclosure.
That sounds about right.
May bash, is ii CLPP’s usual process to collect the lead data on an ongoing basis.if so, at what level is
the data usually analyzed (by Epi?} iS it daily nmonthly? Quarterly? Annually? How would we normally
detect/know if there is an issue in a particular iocality---do you look at it at county ievel ar smaller when
you peruse your data? This question may arise.
E
Hi all-- E talked to Sob to confirm the information | had shared about the Hurley lab results. itis a little
more nuanced than | had explained, forwarding Bol‘s explanation, FY.
Nancy
Cristin has been working all day on this. We are working together right now and expect to be doing so for a
while this evening. We are committed to getting monthly proportion of tested positive graphic for each region
(high risk, other flint, other Genesee) for 0-6 year olds for tomorrow am review by Corinne — we will forward
when comfortable it is correct.
To do this, we are having to identify tests on a monthly basis for the denominator, up until (and including) the
first incidence of high EBLL in the year. Then remove subsequent tests for that child in the rest of the calendar
year. The whole thing starts over the next calendar year. We are in a maze of do-loops right now.
Sarah
I am interviewing job candidate during this time. Cristin and Bob have talked and he is working on the file we
need. Bob, Cristin is following up with one question.
Sent from my iPad
ispoke with Cristin. [have extracted a file frorn the Warehouse with all tests for Genesee County, age
We talked about which test to use-—-| had been using the first elevated test (>= 5, whether venous, capillary or
unknown) and Cristin will probably de the same}. Once Cristin has geocoded all records to identify which are in
City of Flint and which are out-county, she can then slice and dice them as appropriate.
Mii be happy to help in any way | can.
Bob is assembling a list of questions, info he needs to share with/obtain from Epi to do a data pull. Can
we get in the same room, perhaps around 11:30 or 12?
Sent from my iPhone