All-
A reporter with Bridge Magazine is requesting the statewide 2014 (and if possible, 2015} CLPPP data. Bob sent me the
attached county-level info for 2014 which | have net shared yet, as it’s not the final report.
We would like to touch base to make sure the data has been finalized and reviewed by epi before it's posted online.
Eden ~ we'll reach out to you in the morning to discuss the media request. Beyond the data, the reporter is also
interested in discussing home lead investigations.
Jennifer Eisner
Public information Officer
Michigan Department of Health and Human Services
Office: 517-241-2112 or EisnerJ@michigan.gov
:
Cell
Attached you will find the items | mentioned this morning that were forwarded to the Task Force yesterday.
--A detailed MDHHS Action Plan on Flint Water Public Health
--An overview provided by our Bureau of EMS, Trauma and Preparedness giving further detail on considerations for use
of the Incident Command System or Community Health Emergency Coordination Center (CHECC)
--Answers to the lead abatement questions posed to the department from the Task Force.
Thanks--g
xxxEND_PAGE:dhhs03_b0725_2535_2535_1
1. EBLinvestigations: the investigation report, including the water information, should be provided to the MDHHS
Healthy Homes Section within two weeks on average after the investigation is completed. This includes time for
receipt of specimen test results (water, dust wipes, soil).
2. Elevated EBLs: there were 18 children with elevated EBLs shown in the summary report as of October 30,
2015. | have the more detailed age breakdown for the updated report which would show data from 10/1/2015
to 11/13/2015. There are 22 children with elevated EBLs. Of children < 6, 14 have levels 5 — 14, 2 have levels 15
—44. Among children 6 to 17 years, 5 have levels 5— 14 and 1 has a level 15-44. In summary, 19 children fall
into the 5 — 14 category and 3 in the 15 -44 category. So most kids are in the 5 — 14 mcg/dL category if they
have elevated EBLs. The table is attached. Epidemiology is not planning on sending these more detailed tables
up to you routinely, but this table gives you a feel for the testing by age group and whether or not the test, if
known, is venous or capillary.
Corinne
xxxEND_PAGE:dhhs02_b0600_2199_2199_1
Hi all,
Notes from our call this AM.
Thanks,
Rashmi
Rastini Fravis, MPH, CHES
Bureau Director of Family, Maternal, and Child Health
Michigan Department of Health & Human Services
Population Health and Community Services
Capitol View Building, 6 Floor
Lansing, MI 48913
Phone: 517-335-8922
Fax: 517-335-9032
Confidentiality Notice: This message, including any attachments, is intended solely for the use of the named
recipient(s) and may contain confidential and/or privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure
or distribution of any confidential and/or privileged information contained in this e-mail is expressly prohibited. If
you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy any and all copies of the
original message.
xxxEND_PAGE:dhhs03_b0024_0055_0055_1
All --
Attached are Nick's updated talking points, as well as updated general Flint talking points. These include the
most current info about filters.
Thank you,
Jennifer
xxxEND_PAGE:dhhs02_b1002_3577_3577_1
No, do not worry- let me do the talking---there is still AN ASSOCIATION but doesn't reach a statistical
significance.... and further analysis is STILL happening. Further we will also say that we cannot say it is all due
to water... WE ARE STILL ON TRACK FROM YESTERDAV---there is an 18% increase in high risk zips, EPI-TALK
fam confused, can you say this in plain English for me because when i read that there is not a statistical significance to
the change in the nurmbers Lam wondering if everything we were saying yesterday is wrong.