Correspondence between

Emails where every selected person appears as a sender, recipient, or copied participant.

RE: Lead/Copper ?

Kris, please weigh in before Adam calls them back. Pat suggested they resample, but he forgot it was already October (Can't fault Pat - | can’t remember what YEAR this is!) | believe the samples are improper and should not be used to calculate the 90". The supply cannot resample because we are outside the June-Sept monitoring period. Calculate the 90" on the available proper sample results. The supply is short the minimum number of samples, so an M/R violation applies as does admin fine and PN. | could be persuaded on the admin fine.

RE: Lead/Copper ?

Date: Monday, October 03, 2011 3:15:19 PM Kris, please weigh in before Adam calls them back. Pat suggested they resample, but he forgot it was already October (Can't fault Pat - | can’t remember what YEAR this is!) | believe the samples are improper and should not be used to calculate the 90". The supply cannot resample because we are outside the June-Sept monitoring period. Calculate the 90" on the available proper sample results. The supply is short the minimum number of samples, so an M/R violation applies as does admin fine and PN. | could be persuaded on the admin fine.

Lead/Copper ?

| was notified by Jeff Antil that Detroit received samples from Flint, and they were 2 samples short. Actually they had all samples, but according to the last use and collection times for 2 samples, equaled 5 hrs and 5.5 hrs stagnation time. Input please. thanks, Adam 1 xxxEND_PAGE:deq04_b075_2261_2598_138 Rennaker, Joanne (DEQ)

Lead/Copper ?

Date: Monday, October 03, 2011 2:20:13 PM | was notified by Jeff Antil that Detroit received samples from Flint, and they were 2 samples short. Actually they had all samples, but according to the last use and collection times for 2 samples, equaled 5 hrs and 5.5 hrs stagnation time. Input please. thanks, Adam xxxEND_PAGE:deq01_b207_3873_3873_1