Lindsey Smith

Reporter at Michigan Public Radio / Media

41

Emails

Apr 2015–Jan 2016

Archive range

41 emails found.

RE: A Fix for Flint: Groups File Federal Lawsuit to Secure Safe Drinking Water in Flint

Lindsey... You may attribute the following to me. We have received and are reviewing the lawsuit but we do not comment on current litigation. That said, the state's top priority is making sure the people of Flint immediately have access to safe, clean water, and that includes reaching every home to supply water, filters, replacement filter cartridges and water testing kits. The administration is also working with independent experts on testing of the water and will continue to work with them going forward. Thanks, Terry Terry Stanton, Administrator Communications Division MI Department of Treasury (517) 335-2167 [email protected]

Fwd: A Fix for Flint: Groups File Federal Lawsuit to Secure Safe Drinking Water in Flint

Hey there Terry, Happy New Year. Hope you're doing ok. I'm just sending this along in some offhand chance Dept of Treasury wants to comment. It was only filed today so I *assume* not, but figured I should at least ask. The suit names much of the RTAB in Flint and Khouri in addition to the City of Flint. Let me know either way if you could. Thanks. Best~ ree ee eee Forwarded message ----------

Flint compliance sampling - media request

Good morning Karen and happy New Year. I'm hoping you may be able to help or at least point me in the right direction on who can help me find something. Back in November, Mike Prysby sent a letter to Flint looking for information related to compliance sampling for LCR. I've attached the letter here if that helps. Prysby was looking for a response from Flint on or before December 30th. Wondering if you guys have gotten anything from the city yet? I'm asking them too, just with it being a holiday week and all, I thought I'd see if you or anyone else is around today. All the best, Lindsey Smith West Michigan Reporter Michigan Radio xxxEND_PAGE:executiveofficeemails20_b1366_3511_3512_1 Office (616) 551-0717 xxxEND_PAGE:executiveofficeemails20_b1366_3511_3512_2

RE: FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: Independent Review Confirms State Made Decision to

Use Flint River, Failed to Ensure Corrosion Control Lindsey, | didn’t know if you want a copy of our statement regarding the Office of Auditor General’s letter. First, here’s a copy of the letter in case you don’t have it: htte://www.audeen michigan gov/finalodis/15 16/1761032015 pat Our statement: The letter from the Office of the Auditor General includes some criticisms, but also reflects that state officials were following accepted protocols, or in one case, an interpretation of the corrosion control program that the EPA later clarified. But we need to do better in ensuring Flint residents have safe water and tracking children affected by elevated lead levels. We continue to work with the bipartisan task force that is reviewing all the actions at the state, local and federal level and is expected to offer recommendations in a month or so. Gov. Snyder is committed to working with Flint Mayor Weaver and officials on these issues. We appreciate the efforts of the Auditor General and will carefully consider all of the recommendations contained in the letter. Lindsey, for your background, here is a summary of answers from the Office of the Auditor General in response to questions mostly posed by Sen. Jim Ananich’s office (the auditor added a few questions in the 11-page report). The questions were posed as the OAG conducts an audit of the Office of Drinking Water and Municipal Assistance’s handling of the Flint water crisis. Conclusions: @ While the Flint City Council voted in March 2013 to move to the KWA pipeline, it didn’t designate the Flint River as an interim water source. But the Department of Environmental Quality had approved the river as a backup source for emergency purposes in 2006. The treated water met safety standards in quarterly tests by the Flint Water Treatment Plant, but Flint had never tested its effect on the distribution system. @ In an email review of key DEQ managers to determine if there was an effort to conceal information, only one email exchange raised red flags. The Environmental Protection Agency had asked DEQ in February 2015 if Flint had a corrosion control program; the DEQ responded the city had an optimized program in place. In April the EPA asked again, and the DEQ said that the Flint Water Treatment Plant was not doing corrosion control. DEQ later explained that the first answer was referring to its Lead and Copper Rule program, in which it monitors a new water source (in this case, the Flint river) for lead/copper for two consecutive six-month periods to determine if corrosion treatment is necessary. The report says there’s no reason to believe that DEQ willfully xxxEND_PAGE:executiveofficeemails20_b1315_3404_3405_1 misrepresented information to the EPA. It also concludes that Office of Drinking Water and Municipal Assistance employees appeared to have notified management properly about the unfolding Flint water situation. @ DEQ did not consult with the EPA on how best to apply the Lead and Copper Rule monitoring practices after the switch to Flint water, but from past experience, DEQ believed it was doing so correctly by doing two rounds of six-month monitoring on the new water source before determining optimal corrosion control. The EPA disagreed with DEQ’s interpretation of the LCR, but later stated that the LCR was open to interpretation. It then clarified the rule: Corrosion controls already in place when Flint was on Detroit water should have been maintained after the switch. @ DEQ should have notified the Flint WTP to start corrosion controls once the first round of six-month sampling results arrived in late March 2015 and showed the water exceeded acceptable lead levels. @ DEQ doesn’t operate the Flint WTP so it doesn’t have any accountability measures to ensure the WTP is collecting water samples from tier 1 homes, i.e., residences with lead service lines, soldering or plumbing. Instead, DEQ relies on Flint’s certification of sample sites. The auditor suggests DEQ should consider an independent verification of the sampling pool or of Flint’s certifications. In November 2015, Flint said it had no way to ensure the sites were all tier 1. Water samples came from 175 randomly distributed testing bottles. DEQ has asked Flint to verify its prior samples by this Wednesday (12/30). ™@ There’s been controversy that DEQ dropped two sampling sites with high lead levels from its second six-month review. The auditor determined it was appropriate for DEQ to do so because those sites did not meet federal criteria. It was also appropriate for DEQ to require flushing taps the night before sampling to ensure faucets didn’t contain overly stagnant water. H@ Charts show that most water samples were taken in the sixth month of the six-month testing period. The auditor said it’s difficult to determine if the lateness of the sampling affects the accuracy. Dave Murray higandmurray xxxEND_PAGE:executiveofficeemails20_b1315_3404_3405_2

Re: FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: Independent Review Confirms State Made Decision to

Use Flint River, Failed to Ensure Corrosion Control 10-4. Can't fit into a 40 second headline but will quote in web version. Best~ We agreed with the findings in the Auditor General's review. The findings align with our internal department review. We appreciate the Auditor General's work to provide a fair and well considered took at same key fosues. bs Brad Wurfel Communications Director, Michigan Department of Environmental Quality wurfelb@michigs

RE: FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: Independent Review Confirms State Made Decision to

Use Flint River, Failed to Ensure Corrosion Control We agreed with the findings in the Auditor General's review. The findings align with our internal department review. We appreciate the Auditor General's work to provide a fair and well considered look at same key issues. b Brad Wurfal Communications Director, Michigan Department of Environmental Quality

Re: FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: Independent Review Confirms State Made Decision to Use Flint River, Failed to

Ensure Corrosion Control I did. Gladly, cause, you know, there's a hell of a lot more in that than how these two would like to paint things. Anyway, let me know if you *do* want to have a say - deadline 330p please and thanks. xxxEND_PAGE:executiveofficeemails20_b1314_3400_3403_1 Did you get a copy of the letter? Sent from my iPhone ° =) go oO fe) WN x I) oO = an g = eS On 2 a 5 Qa. a @Q we mn zB. = > A dds is) fe i ree ey ie, ies ia ‘aa cD ei foal Vv = 3 lo} = @ Hi Brad, Not sure if they're just late to the party or sitting on this or what (it's dated Dec 23rd) but editors have deemed this worthy of a couple spot news headlines today. Let me know if you'd like to comment. Best~ Date: Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 1:01 PM

RE: New water sample data - media request

Hi Lindsey, The spreadsheet on the website was braken down by zip code. The addresses were deliberately left off to protect the privacy of those individuals that requested testing. Thank you George George L. Krisztian Flint Action Plan Coordinator Laboratory Director Michigan Department of Environmental Quality Desk ph (517) 264- 6719 | Cell ph | PPI ' Sent: Monday, November 09, "2015 me 20 PM

Flint water follow up question

To
Pat Cook
Hi Pat, So... Rebecca Williams gave me your number but it doesn't seem to work - or it says it's your old phone number and I hit zero and it sent me to somebody's voicemail who I didn't recognize. I wanted to talk to you about Flint water. I know you left her a message when she reached out to you a few weeks ago saying you didn't have anything to do with the Flint water project. But I noticed that you signed off on the construction permits that allowed the city to make the switch. It looks like maybe you were filling in for Mike Prysby? Do you have a few minutes to sort that out for me? Best~ Lindsey Smith West Michigan Reporter Michigan Radio xxxEND_PAGE:deq17_b056_0754_0754_1

FYI - Edwards reference

Hi Jim, Hey I was listening back to the tape and I think maybe when I was referring to Mark's questions a few times (that I had on my phone?) I didn't make it clear I was talking about my co-worker Mark Brush, not Marc Edwards. So there was a quote that we have from you in an online story today where you referenced Edwards that we edited down to not include that reference. It was something like ‘well if Mr. Edwards doesn't like the way the 90th percentile is calculated...' We figured, one you probably wouldn't have mentioned Edwards if it wasn't for maybe thinking I was asking his questions and two, it wasn't really necessary to have for the piece anyway. Plus, Brad, I was thinking of our conversation a week or so ago about that Stateside interview - so I Just wanted to try to be transparent about this. That is all. Best~ Lindsey Smith West Michigan Reporter Michigan Radio Office (616) 5. xxxEND_PAGE:deq14_b0819_2716_2716_1

Re: Interview request

To
Unknown recipient
Hi Jim, what time works for you? I will drive to Lansing. I can't come earlier than 1030a but prefer leaving no later than 4p. Best-

Re: Interview request

To
Unknown recipient
Sorry. This is one occasion I gotta go in person. And I thought I could give til wednesday morning, but did not factor in that Tuesday is election night and I'll be in allegan county til lord knows when. 1p constitution hall it is. Thanks. Best-

Re: Former Flint EMs

To
Unknown recipient
I can do 4 or 430 or tomorrow. It's really gotta be in person. If we have to push til Monday that'll work too. Please let me know. I don't want to drive out today if we're not talking On Thursday, October 29, 2015, Stanton, Terry A. (Treasury)

Re: Former Flint EMs

To
Unknown recipient
If you have any reliable info at all re: cost savings, I'd appreciate it. I'm digging around. See you Thursday. Best~ On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 4:48 PM, Stanton, Terry A. (Treasury)

Re: Former Flint EMs

To
Unknown recipient
Thursday would be better on my end. I'll plan on heading out your way, maybe crash a conference room over there or something? On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 1:02 PM, Stanton, Terry

Re: Former Flint EMs

To
Unknown recipient
Hey not sure what day works for you... I now have until Nov 2. Lemme know. On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 10:50 AM, Stanton, Terry A. (Treasury) <[email protected]> wrote: Hey Lindsey... I can provide you with a list of the managers who worked in Flint, though I cannot promise | will be able to put you in contact with anyone directly. { do think it is important for you to have the following background...and to reiterate that the decision to move to KWA, and thus the decision to use the Flint River as a temporary source (until KWA came on line) was a decision made collectively by local 2 xxxEND_PAGE:treasury01_b36_6099_6552_436 officials...they mayor, city council, and others. Please see the information below and attached for additional background on timing, decision- making, etc. Discussions about the possible development of a Flint- area/Genesee County water system had been on-going since the early 2000's and the City of Flint had been in discussions about the possibility of joining KWA for much of that time, certainly prior to the appointment of an emergency manager (Mike Brown) in December 2011. The following M- Live articles show the city was looking at a possible move to KWA, which Genesee County strongly supported, well before a manager was appointed. gen esee county _w.html ndex.ssf/2011/01/water pipeline _v S flint_river.html ndex.ssf/2011/04/city of flint_still mulling wa.html http: be_presente.html ndex.ssf/2011/12/so_ far so good genesee_county 1.htmi 3 xxxEND_PAGE:treasury01_b36_6099_6552_437 Additionally, The Flint Journal supported the move to KWA in an editorial in Sept. 2011, again, prior to the appointment of a manager. t/index.ssf/2011/09/our voice _its decision time fo.html Prior to the decision to move to KWA, which the Mayor and City Council fully supported (March 2013 Flint Journal story cites 7-1 City Council vote to join KWA); i fint_city council approves re.html the city’s emergency manager (Mike Brown in June 2012; Ed Kurtz in Sept. 2012) twice requested permission from DWSD to blend river water with DWSD water to ensure high quality, safe drinking water for residents, while saving the city an estimated $2-3 million annually (DWSD was proposing a 5x rate increase for the City of Flint). It is also important to note that the Genesee County Drain Commissioner, who had been heading up the KWA_ project, required that Flint’s elected leaders approve _of and sign-off on the transition to KWA as he believed it was important to have the city’s elected officials make the decision and not an emergency manager (see attached). Under PA 436, an emergency manager’s approval is required for transactions of $50,000 or more, and thus Ed Kurtz did approve the 4 xxxEND_PAGE:treasury01_b36_6099_6552_438 eventual move to KWA, again with full support and urging from the Mayor and City Council. Kurtz's letter, detailing that decision after consideration of DWSD’s “last, best offer” is attached. This is not a situation where the Mayor and Council wanted to utilize one system with the EM reversing course. All involved in the decision- making process agreed KWA was the best long-term option for the City of Flint. With Flint’s decision to go with KWA, DWSD terminated Flint’s contract, effective April 17, 2014 (letter attached). Given that termination, Flint had two “options:” -sign a long-term (30 year) agreement with DWSD, which was not economically feasible given the city’s decision to go with KWA -Use Flint River as an interim source (it had long been the city’s backup) until KWA was on-line w ater to come f.htmi « [tis also important to note that the current situation in Flint has been exacerbated by years of neglect and a lack of maintenance to the decades-old system. All this said, the most important issue now is moving things forward, through the collaborative State, City, and Foundation effort to ensure safe drinking water for the residents of Flint. xxxEND_PAGE:treasury01_b36_6099_6552_439

Showing 1-25 of 41