F Flint Water Crisis Public Archive

Correspondence between

Emails where every selected person appears as a sender, recipient, or copied participant.

Paul Diefenbach Robert Scott

RE: Medicaid Lead Testing reports

See all emails with these participants
h’s a sticky one. We felt we needed to make the change to “confirmed” after we teak 4 closer look at our data-even at the 4-9 levels so many capillary tests are followed by a lower venous test, 90 inclucling all 5-9s (cap and venous} is misleading. Qn the other hand, that creates a precipitous drop in the number of kids with BLL >=5, so | provided the old version (corfirmed and unconfirmed) for comparison with previous years. So, ray suggestion is this: when displaying 2014 nurnbers arly, use the “confirmed” columns. When comparing against previaus years, use the “confirmed & unconfirmed” columns. Of course this creates potential for lots of confusion, 30 some explanatory notes might be appropriate.

RE: Medicaid Lead Testing reports

See all emails with these participants
It's a sticky one, We felt we needed ta make the change to “confirmed” after we took a closer look at our date--even at the 5-9 levels so many capillary tests are followed by a lower vendus test, so including all 5-9s (cap and venous} is misleading. Or the other hand, that creates a precipitous drop in the number of kids with BLL »=5, $0 | provided the old version iconfirmed and unconfirrned} for cornparison with previous years. 50, my suggestion is this: when displaying 2014 numbers only, use the “confirmed” columns. When comparing against previous years, use the “confirmed & unconfirmed” columns. Of course this creates potential for lots af confusion, so some explanatory notes might be appropriate.