RE: Drinking Water and Soil Cleanup Criterion for Lead
- From
- Richard Benzie
Date: Thursday, December 17, 2015 10:19:54 AM
Christine,
| think this issue needs to be discussed and decided at the Senior Management Team
Level. We are not toxicologists in ODWMA and we rely upon EPA and those of you in the
department that have this expertise to provide guidance.
It has been our position that there is no safe level of lead exposure, so setting a cleanup
criteria based on minimizing the potential for exposure to the extent possible is
appropriate. However, with a drinking water standard that is NOT a Maximum
Contaminant Level (MCL) but essentially a Treatment Technique that utilizes a statistical
analysis of lead results from a sampling pool of targeted, high risk customers and requires
that no more than 10% of these results exceed 15 parts per billion will be even more
difficult to message should a cleanup criterion be established much lower than this Action
Level.
Your proposed Part 201 drinking water criterion of 1 ppb may be appropriate. If so, we
(DEQ) will just have to develop the proper messaging to explain the difference between
drinking water standards, especially Action Levels and Treatment Techniques, and
cleanup criteria. Thus far, it has been difficult for the public to comprehend that 15 ppb is
not a MCL.
Richard
Richard Benzie, P.E., Chief
Field Operations Section
Office of Drinking Water and Municipal Assistance, MDEQ
517-284-6512