Correspondence between

Emails where every selected person appears as a sender, recipient, or copied participant.

quick question on flint lead

Importance: High Sorry for the lateness of this question, but i just came up: Dan Wyant says staff followed protocal for testing of a srnailer city. Does that explain why the state tests dicin’t find a lead problern at first? And if the tests had been done for a city of Filnt’s size, ft would have been flagged sooner? This isn’t clear from the staternent or from ary of those emails. Thanks .. Nora Macaluse Bloomberg BMA xxxEND_PAGE:deq14_b0760_2574_2574_1

FW: Request for Disclosure of Official Files (FOIA 6526-15)

Nore, thanks for dropping a line. Here’s the full set of ernails, per your request. Also, here’s what DEQ Director Dan Wyant had to say yesterday in a separate interview. “What has become clear in recent weeks is that staff believed they were handling the situation in accordance with the proper protocol for a water provider using a new source, but the federal Lead and Copper rule has a particular provision for communities over 50,000 people; that the system operator must continue treating with full corrosion control even as they test the water. What the staff did would have been the proper protocol for a community under 50,000 people. None of the DEQ staff in this division had ever worked on a water source switch for a community over 50,000 people — it’s uncommon for our big communities to switch sources. It's increasingly clear there was confusion here, but it also is increasingly clear that DEQ staff believed they were using the proper federal protocol and they were not. The Governor will soon announce an independent, third party, after-action review to detail what happened and why, and offer steps to make sure Michigan’s drinking water program is on a better course in the future. There is substantial controversy over the lead and copper rule — the EPA has been working for years on ways to update and strengthen it, and Michigan will be an active part of that conversation going forward. The situation in Flint is a snapshot of an issue affecting cities around the state and the nation. More than a dozen states reportedly use the sampling protocol Michigan uses — that’s not a defense of the protocol, but rather an indication that even experts on the issue disagree about the most effective testing methods. What everyone can agree on is that lead is a serious issue. And | think everyone can agree that when the state came to recognize that there could be a health threat in the city, we took appropriate action. We are now engaged in an unprecedented effort to protect kids and families in Flint, develop more knowledge about what has happened and how people were affected, and take steps to make sure it doesn’t happen again — in Michigan, or anywhere else. All who brought this issue forward deserve credit for bringing it to us. Our actions reflected inexperience, and our public response to criticism was the wrong tone early in this conversation. But the best we can do with the situation going forward is represented in our present course — the Governor's plan represents all the suggestions outlined in the draft EPA memo, the Virginia Tech report, and the guidance we've gotten from EPA. We will learn from this. We will make necessary changes to see to it that our program becomes a national leader in protection.” Brad Wurfel xxxEND_PAGE:deq15_b269_1094_1095_1 Communications Director Michigan Department of Environmental Quality xxxEND_PAGE:deq15_b269_1094_1095_2

flint

Following up on these e-mails you’ve released, arid Dan Wyant’s comments re review. Can you provide these? And carirm that they were first compiled due to a FOIA request? Also, what's next on the investigation front? is that something the governor's office is putting together? Thanks ... Nore Macalusea Bloomberg BNA xxxEND_PAGE:deq14_b0751_2560_2560_1