Correspondence between

Date: Monday, January 12, 2015 1:02:05 PM | have several questions about this matter. Why does “public traffic’ deserve a higher consideration than concern for state workers? How does that reasoning appear to state employees? A visitor may take one drink of water from this site in their lifetime. State workers (like any employees) may get half of the water they consume each day at their place of employment. Which group faces the greater health risk

Date: Monday, January 12, 2015 1:02:00 PM | have several questions about this matter. Why does “public traffic’ deserve a higher consideration than concern for state workers? How does that reasoning appear to state employees? A visitor may take one drink of water from this site in their lifetime. State workers (like any employees) may get half of the water they consume each day at their place of employment. Which group faces the greater health risk

have several questions about this matter, Why dees “public traffic’ deserve a higher consideration than concer for state workers? How does that reasoning appear to state ernployees? A visitor may take one drink of water from this site in their Hfetime. State workers (ike any employees) may get half of the water they consume each day at their place of employment. Vvhich group faces the greater health risk frorn drinking water in state occupied premises? Are other state owned/occupied facilities in Flint being provided with the sare service? How about a Secretary of State’s offices or the DHS facilities? Are there any state correctional facilities that receive drinking water from Fint? hat would DTMB have done if the problern had occurred in Lansing? Vvould the stete of Michigan be providing bottled water or an alternate supply of drinking water to all of the slate owned or stale employee locations that receive Lansing drinking water and allow public access? Vho would make that decision? Why wouldn't that decision maker seek the advice of the Office of Drinking Water and Municipal Assistance before deciding? VVould it be building by building or one decision be made for state facilities? How does this action by OTMB impact the answer when ODVWMA, district staff are asked by others in the media or from the general public about whether Flint residents should continue to consume Flin’s drinking water with elevated disinfection bypraducis? No doubt it wil make it more difficult from a perceplion standpoint for ODWMA staff. if this matter were about an acute health threat, such as E.coli or nitrates, then i would applaud the decision. But when we are dealing with a chronic health threat in a community water system, | think the appropriate action is to ensure public awareness and education, establish a reasonable compliance schedule, and alow individuals to make personal choices if they wish. And if someone like (5M or the State of Michigan decides to implement such measures as supplying an altemate water supply for a chronic nealth threal inat should be of 4 limited duration, fine, but it should be uniformiy implemented. xxxEND_PAGE:deq20_b01_001_057_23 Hf DIME waouid ike fo meet to discuss this issue and procedures for communication and possible actions in future, sinilar events, we would be willing to participate. Richard Bengzie, PE, Chief Field Operations Section Office of Drinking Water and Municipal Assisiance, MDEQ 817-284-6512

Date: Monday, January 12, 2015 10:22:23 AM Jennifer, | spoke with Jeanette this morning. She informed me....given that this state building has high public traffic (Flint citizens); it was felt prudent to offer an alternative supply of drinking water to citizens entering the building. Jeanette asked me what should be expected with the next round of samples (March time-frame). | explained to her how compliance with TTHMs is determined (based on a running annual average of 4 quarters) and the public notification requirements. The city’s next round of samples will be collected around the 3" week of Feb; however, regardless of sample results, compliance with the TTHM MCL will not be re-achieved due to the high levels detected last summer. Although the city will remain out of compliance, (primarily based on the previous results), the November sample results were substantially lower (7 of 8 locations below the MCL). We anticipate that most (if not all) locations will be in compliance with the February monitoring. The city; however, needs to make a diligent effort to convey TTHM status to their residents as soon as possible after new results become available (regardless of compliance status). Jeanette will pass this information on. Michael Prysby, P.E. District Engineer Office of Drinking Water and Municipal Assistance 517 290-8817

Date: Monday, January 12, 2015 10:22:24 AM Jennifer, | spoke with Jeanette this morning. She informed me....given that this state building has high public traffic (Flint citizens); it was felt prudent to offer an alternative supply of drinking water to citizens entering the building. Jeanette asked me what should be expected with the next round of samples (March time-frame). | explained to her how compliance with TTHMs is determined (based on a running annual average of 4 quarters) and the public notification requirements. The city’s next round of samples will be collected around the 3" week of Feb; however, regardless of sample results, compliance with the TTHM MCL will not be re-achieved due to the high levels detected last summer. Although the city will remain out of compliance, (primarily based on the previous results), the November sample results were substantially lower (7 of 8 locations below the MCL). We anticipate that most (if not all) locations will be in compliance with the February monitoring. The city; however, needs to make a diligent effort to convey TTHM status to their residents as soon as possible after new results become available (regardless of compliance status). Jeanette will pass this information on. Michael Prysby, P.E. District Engineer Office of Drinking Water and Municipal Assistance 517 290-8817

Jennifer, ispoke with Jeanette this morning. She inforrned me....given that this state building has high public traffic (Flint citizens}; it was felt prudent to offer an alternative supply of drinking water to citizens entering the building. Jeanette asked me what should be expected with the next round of samples (March time-frame}. | explained to her how compliance with TTHMs is determined (based on a running annual average of 4 quarters} and the public notification requirements. The city’s next round of samples will be collected around the 3° week of Feb: however, regardless of sample results, complance with the TTHM MCL will not be re-achieved due to the high levels detected last summer. Although the city willremain out of compliance, {primarily based on the previous results}, the November sample results were substantially lower (7 of & locations below the MCL). We anticipate that most (if not all) locations will be in compliance with the February monitoring. The city; however, needs to make 3 diligent effort to convey TTHM status to their residents as soon as possible after new results become available (regardless of compliance status}. Jeanette will pass this information on. Michael Prysby, PLE. District Engineer Office of Drinking Water and Municipal Assistance BL? 290-8817

ileft a message for Jeanette to call me back. Michael Prysby, PE. District Engineer Office of Drinking Water and Municioal Assistance 547 290-8817

Jennifer, iwill respond to Jeanette Michael Prysby, PLE. District Engineer Office of Drinking Water and Municipal Assistance 517 290-8817

Hi Mike! xxxEND_PAGE:deq20_b01_001_057_24 Are you handling this one? if so are you able to address Jeanette's below? Sev. JEN WoLr Nil Depr. OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY Mi DEPT. OF NATURAL RESQURCES Law ENFORCEMENT DIVISION EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT DESK: SLP-2AS-G232

Mike is on AL and won't be back until Feb. 28. If you need more detailed info in addition to Richard's you are welcome to stop by our office (Lansing District Office, 4th Floor North) and we may be able to provide you with what you need, if you can not wait for Mike. Bethel Skinker, P.E. District Engineer Resource Management Division Department of Environmental Quality 517-335-6127

Jennifer, Hopefully Mike can provide you with any details as he is the most familiar with Genesee County water systems and their facilities. | don’t know his schedule and he may be out for the week if tomorrow is his flex day. I can tell you that Flint and Genesee County are customers of Detroit and as such, rely upon remotely located water treatment facilities (on the shore of Lake Huron north of Port Huron). Flint also has a standby treatment plant on the Flint River that can be pressed into service for potable water in an emergency. | believe it is located on the northern side of Flint, but again, Mike is more knowledgeable on this matter. Both water systems do have pumping and storage facilities located throughout their service area and of course, underground transmission and distribution systems but | do not expect underground piping to be deemed vulnerable to a civil unrest scenario. If there are any storage tanks or pumping stations in this vicinity, Mike should know. He would also know if there are any other water systems near this location. Richard xxxEND_PAGE:deq11_b114_0262_0263_1

Hello Richard & Mike, | will be participating in a tabletop exercise next week involving the City of Flint. The scenario is a civil unrest extending to 169 and 175. Could you please provide any information regarding the public water supply in this area? Thanks! Sgt. Jennifer Wolf, PEM Dept. of Natural Resources Dept. of Environmental Quality Ofc. 517.241.2041 Cell 517.719.0028 wolfil@michizen gov <malltowelliL@ michigan. gov> xxxEND_PAGE:deq11_b114_0262_0263_2