Correspondence among

Emails where every selected person appears as a sender, recipient, or copied participant.

Linda Dykema Martha Stanbury Patricia Mckane

RE: Update on blood report

From: Corinne Miller
To: Linda Dykema , Martha Stanbury , Patricia Mckane

Dec 7, 2015 5:18 PM

Until Junaicl has access to the warehouse, Pattl with Yan's additional support would be updating the blood leed test counts. Once Junaid has acress to the warehouse data he should be able to take this function an. {My understanding was that Patti has already demonstrated to you [Martha, Linda, Junaid] haw she pulis the data from the warehouse and then can provide SAS code for the analysis to Junaid.)

RE: 2014 lead data

From: Martha Stanbury
To: Patricia Mckane , Linda Dykema

Dec 7, 2015 4:30 PM

See all emails with these participants

The other reporter was given counts by county. But only for verious, as | understand it. So this needs to be rerun and then suppression applied. And we probably should give the same information to the other reporter. Patti — are you OK with this?

RE: 2014 lead data

From: Martha Stanbury
To: Patricia Mckane , Linda Dykema

Dec 7, 2015 4:00 PM

See all emails with these participants

But it seems to me that we should not release counts less than 6 — those cells should be suppressed. Your thoughts?

RE: Lead 2010_2015 workbook11.25.15.xIsx

From: Linda Dykema
To: Martha Stanbury , Patricia Mckane

Dec 1, 2015 2:01 PM

See all emails with these participants

Attached is the draft renort as requested by the Governor’s office. Please do not share with anyone as it is not yet final. The time for these discussions, at least for this version of the report, was last week and we do not have any additional time to make changes. Maybe on the next version or when the epi analysis has transitioned to DEH.