Correspondence among

Emails where every selected person appears as a sender, recipient, or copied participant.

RE: FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: MDHHS releases latest data outlining blood lead levels in Flint; Follow-up care,

g xxxEND_PAGE:dhhs03_b0303_1121_1126_2 001123 Reynolds, Lawrence; Laura Carravallah; Marc Edwards; Valacak, Mark; Andy Leavitt; Base Camp Email; Lasher, Geralyn (DHHS); Eisner, Jennifer (DHHS); Dykema, Linda D. (DHHS)

RE: FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: MDHHS releases latest data outlining blood lead levels in Flint; Follow-up care,

case management resources continue for families Eden, i support frequent updates. Mona and her tearm can continue to de the GIS work and track progress {or lack thereof} in the blood leads. i think that overall, the latest data implies we are on the right track. We can use the upclates to reinforce the importance of using the Hiters and bottled water that are being provided... Kast Regards,

Re: FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: MDHHS releases latest data outlining blood lead levels in Flint; Follow-up care,

case management resources continue for families Hi Dr. Reynolds, | just got done with an email with Mona--- This is a general public report that is high level--not a technical report, and was not meant to represent a technical report. This is general information--of course our surveillance program is tracking by zip, Medicaid, locality, etc. We can discuss further what type of reporting may be useful to a technical audience---as long as not identifiable (some zips have to be suppressed) | don't see why this can't be done (probably not every two weeks like this public one would be) Warm Regards, Eden Michig. 201 Towns: lreys2@email. com> Sent: Thursday, December 3, 2015 3:25 PM

Fwd: FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: MDHHS releases latest data outlining blood lead levels in Flint; Follow-up care,

case management resources continue for families This is a good start but maybe lacking context . Would GIS software identify clusters ? |! am disappointed to see, at this moment , thatDr. Edward's study and Dr. Mona's study which have more granular reporting are given no credence. Is there a reason ? wonsenae == Forwarded message ----------