Correspondence among

All- A reporter with Bridge Magazine is requesting the statewide 2014 (and if possible, 2015} CLPPP data. Bob sent me the attached county-level info for 2014 which | have net shared yet, as it’s not the final report. We would like to touch base to make sure the data has been finalized and reviewed by epi before it's posted online. Eden ~ we'll reach out to you in the morning to discuss the media request. Beyond the data, the reporter is also interested in discussing home lead investigations. Jennifer Eisner Public information Officer Michigan Department of Health and Human Services Office: 517-241-2112 or [email protected] : Cell

1. EBLinvestigations: the investigation report, including the water information, should be provided to the MDHHS Healthy Homes Section within two weeks on average after the investigation is completed. This includes time for receipt of specimen test results (water, dust wipes, soil). 2. Elevated EBLs: there were 18 children with elevated EBLs shown in the summary report as of October 30, 2015. | have the more detailed age breakdown for the updated report which would show data from 10/1/2015 to 11/13/2015. There are 22 children with elevated EBLs. Of children < 6, 14 have levels 5 — 14, 2 have levels 15 —44. Among children 6 to 17 years, 5 have levels 5— 14 and 1 has a level 15-44. In summary, 19 children fall into the 5 — 14 category and 3 in the 15 -44 category. So most kids are in the 5 — 14 mcg/dL category if they have elevated EBLs. The table is attached. Epidemiology is not planning on sending these more detailed tables up to you routinely, but this table gives you a feel for the testing by age group and whether or not the test, if known, is venous or capillary. Corinne xxxEND_PAGE:dhhs02_b0600_2199_2199_1

Epi is running data for # of tests and # of tests >= 5 micrograms per deciliter between January 1, 2013 through April 14, 2014 for Flint residents in these age groups: Children < 6 years old Children 6 through 17 Adults who are 18 and older. | spoke with Michelle Bruneau and she will make changes to the one-page summary once we have the numbers (hopefully by 5 PM or shortly thereafter today). Michelle thought it would be better to have context for the three age groups that are already shown on the one-page summary rather than focusing on children < 6 only. (As mentioned, Eden was fine with the proposal when | spoke with her this afternoon.) Michelle will make the changes and you can see if they are helpful. In terms of the two Zips that are in the summary but not in the trends, the numbers were too small to be included in the trend line. It makes sense to include them in the summary though because they do show some testing activity. Corinne xxxEND_PAGE:dhhs02_b0598_2192_2192_1